Jump to content

BETAOPTICS

Master
  • Posts

    4,314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BETAOPTICS

  1. I think simple toggle and reworking values will suffice.
  2. Cool! Merry Christmas Digital Extremee employees! Merry Christmas fellow Tenno!
  3. Looking good. Please add the information about the last abilities augment and also add a note for those who missed it that Tentacle Swarm does Corrosive damage now instead of Magnetic like it used to.
  4. Like I've said to several others: My posts are not personal evaluations on how things should be but rather evaluations on how things are currently. I don't like the trade laws either hence why my initial post went with I understand that wish but they are still laws that companies are obliged to follow irrespective of my personal viewpoints. Impersonal vs. personal viewpoints.
  5. Lowering prices = altering the trade deal and that is illegal my friend. For example if you go take a look at the prime access bundles, there is a reason why DE only made new bundles available when a new prime access came and not when a pack deal was already going.
  6. It'd be ethically right. But again my comments are not ethical evaluations of how things ought to be, they are evaluations of why DE would take this course of action as it has so many times before this as well (this is not the first time DE has done something like this and they've never decreased monetary prices. Instead they give addtional digital goodies). It is frankly amazing how few on the internet seem to be able to tell the difference between personal and impersonal takes. Oh well I guess it comes with the times we live in.
  7. No? Why are you being dishonest and disingenious? It is mandated by law that you can not alter the deal once it has been sealed monetarily. For instance there was a legal lawsuit few years ago where Elon Musk had to pay up fees for trying to back away from a trade deal on buying Twitter as he had already signed the transaction. Trade law is clumsy, you can't just do whatever you wish however you wish. And again: My comments are not evaluations on how things ought to be but rather they are about how the laws actaully are. It's not my personal opinion on the packs. I would not have said I understand that wish people have made. Now I would suggest you stop being disingenious and stop trolling. It's not productive.
  8. Yeah if you were to risk legal investigation. Like you do realize trade laws exist, right? It's the same reason DE can not re-release the founders program either, as trade laws legally bind them. This is not an evaluation of how things should be but the simple truth of how things are. They suck, yes, and that is all the more reason further consideration should have been had and that's on DE. But I can be pretty confident saying DE nor any other company would be willing to break laws just because they made a bad judgement.
  9. I understand this but the only problem I think it would have is those who already bought the bundle. Not sure how refunds would work there. Maybe? But I think this is the main reason the price was kept as was.
  10. Patience. The update is still deploying due to a technical difficulty. Go make some hot choco while they are hunting the issue and sorting it out.
  11. Still deploying, A technical issue. Hand tight.
  12. Sounds like a you problem. I've never cared for "competitiveness of PvE" games. Especially considering that you believe the weapons are already powerful as they are without the incarnons, and in this current systems in any given week some people will have incarnon's on weapons you won't, and you become what, envious of that? I fail to see the problem. But maybe I'm lucky I am not that envious and petty then, maybe that's my fortunate bias to never haven understood this superficial problem.
  13. Pay-to-win how? It's not more different than buying gear from the market for things you can obtain in hours regardless. Whom do you win over even?
  14. There is only ever a single use case where I'll intentionally build for impact. It only works on Vulkar (Wraith) and Grinlock (Prisma), and that is when I use Internal Bleeding mods (35% chance to apply a bleed proc, 2x the chance if fire rate is below 2.5). This is because the impact will affect the chances to proc slash and the damage tic it will make. But again even for these weapons the impact status effect does nothing, it's the slash that is being built for. Impact has a fundamental issue with the proc effect and what it does. It's effect makes the guns worse in most cases and mercy kills are just not realistically usable in 99,99% of use cases within the game. It should be changed to something else and I feel like mercy in general is a system that doesn't bring value other than in spy missions, and only just even then.
  15. Awesome! This is a perfect summer gift. I just graduated as a software engineer a few weeks ago and now Kullervo is a homeage to our Finnish folklore Kalevala. Fun fact for non Finnish speakers: Kullervo's signature shotgun Rauta means Iron.
  16. There have been similar UI bugs in the past and I was not at full attention capacity to be fair. I just graduated last week so it was the first time I did not have time to get all the materials for the incarnons so and as my attention was divided elsewhere, in my confusion I figured it was just some odd confirmation screen from the last week. The lateral part is on me, but regardless of that, it is clearly a system that needs proper data validation. I became a Software Engineer, so to me this is professionally clear that it needs validation checks. A system this rigid needs to work. To be fair to DE developers, it's tough trying to think all the possible outcomes that can come up with down the line. But it should have been tested appropriately and clearly it wasn't. Well we'll see if DE returns to this topic or not.
  17. Yeah totally. While there is a degree of player agency there, Warframe also has history with bugs like this so it isn't an unreasonable mistake. And to be fair, I wasn't really in my full brain capacity and attention either so that's one me. But like you say, I am not alone and this solution is insufficient I think. I think going into the future there should be some kind of check that would check if the player already hasn't done the incarnon genesis and if the gun has available variants left. If both results are false, then grey those options out or at least give a warning about it. It should have been properly tested to be fair. It is such a rigid system, a player either gets to continue relatively normally or gets absolutely nothing so it is crticial to get it right.
  18. Those are good points. For me I had taken Sibear and Zylok last week, and in my confusion clicked them again. Now I have two incarnon gensis for two weapons that do not even have an alternate version (Wraith, Kuva, Vandal, Tenet etc.) so it is a wasted week. I am unable to see a solution that would account for different variations but this is really bad. I'd lie if I told you I am happy with how DE has handled this.
  19. That sucks because now I have duplicate Incarnon Genesis for weapons that only have a singular variant and I do nothing with these Incarnon Genesis adapters. It's a waste of week for me.
×
×
  • Create New...