Jump to content

-dicht.ThanksFrost-

Hunter
  • Posts

    2,626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by -dicht.ThanksFrost-

  1. On 19/01/2018 at 12:42 PM, Emulad0or said:

    The way it is, why would you use anything BUT Nidus or Inaros? Have you seen the video? That is a Sortie 3, the highest difficulty you can find in the star chart and the highest difficulty Hijack you can find ingame today. And Inaros can do that solo while afk. If you take out the ability to use health to power it, it will force people to actually play the mission, and if you give the same ability to every warframe, people who actually play the mission can go with whatever warframe they like. Either way, there is no reason for only 2 warframes to have this ability

    Sortie missions are a joke get over yourself

  2. 8 minutes ago, peterc3 said:

    "I used a meme to cover up what I was actually saying and got banned for it. DE is soooo evil."

    Maybe it's a personal character flaw, but I have yet to be swayed by the people who claim total innocence and run to the forums to complain publicly about something that will not be discussed publicly by the people who are in change of the bans. Feels like every one of the bans whined about is deserved and there should be more.

    Nibba is a meme it has absolutely nothing to do with the race of the person nor does it belittle the race in question

     

  3. 2 minutes ago, (PS4)Boomstickman98 said:

    So by that same logic, people should be allowed to beat each other up  and kill with no sort of ramification?

    Thats so shortsighted. 

     

    If someone hits you and you hit them back in retaliation. And by the grace of god, i hope not, they die. That's not manslaughter thats self-defense

     

    also keep in mind were talking about words

     

    @(*()$ words

     

    they do nothing

  4. 1 minute ago, DiabolusUrsus said:

    Someone upsetting you doesn't give you the right to insult them back.

    Its not a right it's a decision the same way that person is free to insult me I am free to insult him back.

    The ToS doesn't make sense when you consider that in most cases when someone hits you, you will hit them back. Unless you are mentally of physically incapable of doing so

  5. 41 minutes ago, DiabolusUrsus said:

    No, that's wrong. If someone says you should burn in hell and that bothers you, ignore them and report them.

    There is no reason to fight back; the whole point of the ban/ignore/report system is that they don't want fights breaking out.

    Players shouldn't be expected to police chat for themselves with the ignore feature; if someone breaks the rules they should suffer the consequences. The only issue os that the rules aren't clear enough.

    If word X is banned in chat, how difficult would it be to have the chat bot block the message and send the player "Word X is banned, please don't use it again" the first time? After that just auto-kick.

    You have no right nor the moral high ground to determine whats the appropriate response to this particular situation. That's your opinion

  6. 14 minutes ago, (PS4)Boomstickman98 said:

    the ToS any any game is created to save the developers arse when legal battles come up. All I gotta say there. If you don't like the terms of use, then don't use the service.

    This my be a foreign concept but its called selective use.

    If  I don't agree with the moderation policy of DE I don't Chat on DEs servers.

    This is not like PS4 where I have to pay x dollars per year even if I don't use a chunk of the services it provides. If I don't like the ToS but like the game I am free to avoid chat rooms that can get me service suspended. I can talk bad about a moderator or player in a discord server because it's not in their juristiction and they can't tell people use outside wf channels what they can or cannot say. That's choosing what parts if the service you do and don't use.

     

    Personally I prefer if everyone of all opinions can talk together but many companies, government and people prefer to reinact policies similar to Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipeleago. Then I can't do anything about that myself

  7. Just now, Gabbynaru said:

    I already gave my thoughts on that:

    ____________

    That's why I asked you to explain further what you meant by "the US but not Canada". Can't read your mind, and with such a simple line, I can just jump to conclusions.

    Wtf?

     

    You stated the right of speech in private sectors.

     

    I stated that this applies in the US and maybe not Canada

     

    What part of that did you fail to understand?

  8. 4 minutes ago, (PS4)Boomstickman98 said:

    May I direct you back to the ToS under the same legal user content section:

    Objectionable is left widely open to interpretation. That said, access to this game is a privilege and not a right. Finally, let me direct you all to this portion of the ToS all of us agreed to upon making our accounts under the account termination section:

     

    That's why I stay as far away from here as I can along with region.

    People who think this TOS is justifiable are not worth talking to for extended periods of time

  9. 1 minute ago, xXHobbitXx said:

    nah i prefer there, cause it upset people like yourself :) you can work it out no matter how its spelt :)

    haha wow

     

    Anyways, despite warframe being an open market. People can discover trends, if a certain item sells for 1k then that items and related items will convince buyers to sell for that same price. In the case of scoliac rivens you get what you pay for

×
×
  • Create New...