4d chess move by DE for announcing Edo Prime Armor Unvaulting day after riven dispo s$%^storm

[(PSN)doom-monger]

well played

[-VS-Airikr]

Lucky coincidence imo.

No matter when they would have done the riven changes it was already too late..

And hey at least we dont have to wait until february again for unvaulting so i'm fine with that aswell.

[White_Matter]

Finally, best armorset in the game makes its return.

 

[(PSN)ChiefDevilEggs]

[pig666eon]

8 minutes ago, White_Matter said:

Finally, best armorset in the game makes its return.

 

do you have a source for this?

[Me.KayOh]

I'm not sure what "s$%^storm" the title refers to. And I don't see the problem with the prime vault either.

[(PSN)doom-monger]

Just now, pig666eon said:

do you have a source for this?

do you mean source for the announcement? check in game on the news panel on your ship

[(PSN)doom-monger]

Just now, Me.Church said:

I'm not sure what "s$%^storm" the title refers to. And I don't see the problem with the prime vault either.

refer to the dev workshop on the riven dispo to understand what i mean by s$%^storm

[Maqabir]

1 minute ago, pig666eon said:

do you have a source for this?

Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taste_(sociology)

[Me.KayOh]

1 minute ago, (PS4)doom-monger said:

refer to the dev workshop on the riven dispo to understand what i mean by s$%^storm

Read it yesterday. Still don't see it.

[(PSN)doom-monger]

2 minutes ago, Maqabir said:

Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taste_(sociology)

targis, edo and vetala armor sets are tied for best armor set in the game. that might be my taste but i think objectively they're the best looking armor sets atm

[Neightrix]

Quality 👏

[(PSN)doom-monger]

2 minutes ago, Me.Church said:

Read it yesterday. Still don't see it.

well you probably only read the first page. go deeper or you're just being a stubborn troll. my thread on the arca plasmor riven dispo with over 100 replies got deleted. things got ugly

[Me.KayOh]

Just now, (PS4)doom-monger said:

well you probably only read the first page. go deeper or you're just being a stubborn troll. my thread on the arca plasmor riven dispo with over 100 replies got deleted. things got ugly

I read the post that mattered. And I read some of the responses to it, since at the time I was reading it, the thread was only two pages. I felt like my time would be better spent playing Fortuna, than returning to see...whatever else people wrote. 

Given that DE made these changes based on their own weapon statistics, I am hard-pressed to believe any player when they say "DE should/shouldn't have changed X weapon's disposition" because no player has the data that DE has which makes everyone else's suggestions, personal preferences instead of data-informed decisions.

The accusations leveled against DE with respect to these changes (like someone saying these changes are just "random") are baseless and are only the result of an immature attitude from people because their favourite "cheese" weapon got changed.

DE provided clear and simple context for these changes. Why or how people cannot understand that it's for the benefit of everyone that plays the game, is beyond me.

Also, if you resort to just insulting people, like you just have, I can make safe, informed assumptions as to why your thread got deleted and why, as you put it, "things got ugly." It's not a good look when you do that since you're just discrediting yourself at that point.

You should reconsider your attitude towards the change, towards other people's opinions of the change, and especially you should think about how you should go about lobbying for changes that you as a player would want to see. Because right now, all I'm seeing is a salty person who can't type an angst-filled response fast enough to anyone who disagrees with them. And that's not welcomed here nor is it going to make things any better for you.

[(PSN)doom-monger]

1 minute ago, Me.Church said:

I read the post that mattered. And I read some of the responses to it, since at the time I was reading it, the thread was only two pages. I felt like my time would be better spent playing Fortuna, than returning to see...whatever else people wrote. 

Given that DE made these changes based on their own weapon statistics, I am hard-pressed to believe any player when they say "DE should/shouldn't have changed X weapon's disposition" because no player has the data that DE has which makes everyone else's suggestions, personal preferences instead of data-informed decisions.

The accusations leveled against DE with respect to these changes (like someone saying these changes are just "random") are baseless and are only the result of an immature attitude from people because their favourite "cheese" weapon got changed.

DE provided clear and simple context for these changes. Why or how people cannot understand that it's for the benefit of everyone that plays the game, is beyond me.

Also, if you resort to just insulting people, like you just have, I can make safe, informed assumptions as to why your thread got deleted and why, as you put it, "things got ugly." It's not a good look when you do that since you're just discrediting yourself at that point.

You should reconsider your attitude towards the change, towards other people's opinions of the change, and especially you should think about how you should go about lobbying for changes that you as a player would want to see. Because right now, all I'm seeing is a salty person who can't type an angst-filled response fast enough to anyone who disagrees with them. And that's not welcomed here nor is it going to make things any better for you.

i only commented a couple of time to people on my post when it had like 30 replies. I went to sleep and in the morning i came back to 150ish replies and a "You do not have permission to access..'Whatever i want to move on and don't want to argue about this anymore. 

Let's move forward and be happy about the edo prime unvaulting

[(XBOX)Shodian]

11 minutes ago, (PS4)doom-monger said:

'Whatever i want to move on and don't want to argue about this anymore.

I must ask why you made the topic at hand then.

[Me.KayOh]

39 minutes ago, (XB1)Shodian said:

I must ask why you made the topic at hand then.

Bravo.

Edited November 9, 2018 by Me.Church

[(PSN)doom-monger]

6 hours ago, (XB1)Shodian said:

I must ask why you made the topic at hand then.

i was upset yesterday with what went down. I just wanted to mention that DE was genius for announcing the Prime Unvaulting because this news is helping me cool my head and move on. Now I'm excited for the edo prime armor set,. How can I be mad about that? I'm sure others feel the same way because i wasn't the only person heated about yesterday.

Sure some of my favorite rivens for the arca plasmor, supra, lanka, pyrana, lato vandal, opticor were nerfed but life goes on. Rivens were designed to be changed. I don't agree with it but that's what De wants to do with their game so i have to accept it.

I think people were outraged on the forums and it's there. I don't have to prove anything to that guy but he wanted to argue over the facts. Why would I when the facts are there. go look yourself. He came in here to argue with me

Also i'm not going to waste my time arguing with someone over a keyboard because i've done it before. It won't accomplish anything and means nothing when it's done through text. If you want to argue then let's do it over voice chat. I promise you we'll end up just being cool with each other

[(PSN)doom-monger]

7 hours ago, Me.Church said:

I'm not sure what "s$%^storm" the title refers to. And I don't see the problem with the prime vault either.

i never implied there was a problem with the prime unvaulting. chu mean homie? i think it's fantastic news

[Me.KayOh]

On 2018-11-10 at 1:01 AM, (PS4)doom-monger said:

i never implied there was a problem with the prime unvaulting. chu mean homie? i think it's fantastic news

Ok ????