Jump to content

Nidus is tankier than Inaros, dont @ me.


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GothKazu-EN- said:

i think he means more along the line of healing increases the EFFECTIVENESS of ehp, because you top up and youre right back to 29K (or whatever number applies)
but that also means Trinity is the best tank in the game shrug

Yup, exactly. I mean Nidus also has the whole self ressurection thing going on, so there are some extra variables in there, but is he tankier without parasitic link? Thats the real question from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Skaleek said:

Yup, exactly. I mean Nidus also has the whole self ressurection thing going on, so there are some extra variables in there, but is he tankier without parasitic link? Thats the real question from me.

without link or adaptation, or Scarab armor Inaros ahs about 26K ehp to Nidus's 6 (almost 7)K

Edited by GothKazu-EN-
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GothKazu-EN- said:

without link or adaptation, or Scarab armor Inaros ahs about 26K ehp to Nidus's 6K

For me, and this is obviously a preference, since i personally choose not to factor abilities into EHP, makes Inaros tankier. But parasitic link is obviously the point of contention there. Not to mention Nidus has a more versatile kit in terms of cc/damage/utility/group buffs/healing.

Edited by Skaleek
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Skaleek said:

For me, and this is obviously a preference, since i personally choose not to factor abilities into EHP, makes Inaros tankier. But parasitic link is obviously the point of contention there.

i can understand that completely, do whatever you feel best about, and play how you like

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Skaleek said:

Self heals are not a part of EHP calculation.

Exactly, which makes EHP a calculation that really only shows the 1HK limit.

WF is one of the few games I've played where people dont add self-sustain into EHP calculations.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SneakyErvin said:

Exactly, which makes EHP a calculation that really only shows the 1HK limit.

WF is one of the few games I've played where people dont add self-sustain into EHP calculations.

Yeah, you really only want to know what your threshold for being instagibbed is, because as long as you can take that one hit typically you can respond in time to get yourself safe or the enemy dead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opinion from some1 that mainly plays the Two shieldless Bois. Nidus is tankier with his abilties since 5 seconds of undying can (with a couple of enemies and maggots) be enough to regain 15 stacks, Not even calculating his tankiness. He is however Way more touchable by nullies, since he loses link, cc and Stack regain and Stacks to them in which Case Inaros will Take the lead with his higher innate tankiness (and enormous arcane Grace synergy)

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Eisdschungel said:

Opinion from some1 that mainly plays the Two shieldless Bois. Nidus is tankier with his abilties since 5 seconds of undying can (with a couple of enemies and maggots) be enough to regain 15 stacks, Not even calculating his tankiness. He is however Way more touchable by nullies, since he loses link, cc and Stack regain and Stacks to them in which Case Inaros will Take the lead with his higher innate tankiness (and enormous arcane Grace synergy)

Exactly why I hate Nullies

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Xenox_Ilz-ot said:

Exactly why I hate Nullies

 

24 minutes ago, Eisdschungel said:

Bane of my existence and the reason Why i mainly Play inaros since Fortuna. Nothing Triggers me more than extracting After a sortie with 96 Stacks coz i jumped through a Bubble.

Same. those nullifier fields (not even the bubbles, the freaking comba) are murder

Link to post
Share on other sites

Inaros can face tank nullies just as well as nidus can. Also nidus is caster, inaros is a melee or close quarters kind of frame. This apple/oranges type of comparisons is unnecessary. Some like inaros, some like nidus. What is there need to be said.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, moostar95 said:

Inaros can face tank nullies just as well as nidus can. Also nidus is caster, inaros is a melee or close quarters kind of frame. This apple/oranges type of comparisons is unnecessary. Some like inaros, some like nidus. What is there need to be said.

...that nidus can face tank more stuff...better?
i already addressed that i like both frames. this isnt inaros bashing lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GothKazu-EN- said:

...that nidus can face tank more stuff...better?
i already addressed that i like both frames. this isnt inaros bashing lol

What made me think you we're bashing? Just speaking my mind.

Edited by moostar95
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not buying it

Inaros has none of the weakness that Nidus possess, and in fact more EHP overall.  Someone also ventured off the foundation mentioning CC, damage, etc

Nidus has great CC and damage, sure.  However, Inaros can CC AN ENTIRE ROOM without sacrificing for damage, and still cause lethal damage himself with just a Covert Lethality dagger.

In the end it simply boils down to preference.  We all know Limbo has 100% damage mitigation anyway, so there 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, (XB1)Thy Divinity said:

Not buying it

Inaros has none of the weakness that Nidus possess, and in fact more EHP overall. 

with all of their abilities in mind, ive quite literally already proved the ehp part incorrect.

what weaknesses are you referring to

 

1 minute ago, (XB1)Thy Divinity said:

In the end it simply boils down to preference.  We all know Limbo has 100% damage mitigation anyway, so there 

yes it does, thats what warframe is about. however comma limbo and revenant can still be hurt with their respective "nope" abilities

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...