Oldskinzz Posted July 28, 2019 Share Posted July 28, 2019 Going along this line of reasoning, people with rivens that got buffed should be liable for a penalty of kuva too. Can't let them sit on gains they didn't work for, can we. DE should implement a 10k kuva payment per buffed riven owned by every player. And deduct their plat instead if they don't have enough kuva. And lock the accounts of those without enough plat too, until they cough up. 😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISMW Posted July 28, 2019 Author Share Posted July 28, 2019 10 hours ago, Miser_able said: " I owned some stocks and they lost value. I want the government to compensate me for my loss" 10 hours ago, FlyingDice said: This is like going to the high-roller tables in Vegas and demanding the casino comp you your bets because you got fleeced. dudes, it's a game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISMW Posted July 28, 2019 Author Share Posted July 28, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, CarrotSalad said: You need to remember that DE are open to adjusting disposition if a weak meh weapon did get hit too hard in a disposition change. A few weapons have been altered after feedback from community who put a case. Dont just accept changes if youre absolutely sure the weapon isnt at a good level to begin with. Also remember that as its a seasonal thing its possible your riven will return to a high disposition eventually. Hope so 7 hours ago, Oreades said: I don't need compensation, I don't mind Riven dispositions changing ..... the one thing tho that actually gets to me..... is watghing a 1 star disposition riven get knocked down even further..... at that point what even the what do the disposition ratings even heccin' mean? yeah, it is so strange for some weapons that i haven't even seen in this game ever(excluding lvling up for rank) getting disposition reduction 7 hours ago, Oldskinzz said: Going along this line of reasoning, people with rivens that got buffed should be liable for a penalty of kuva too. Can't let them sit on gains they didn't work for, can we. DE should implement a 10k kuva payment per buffed riven owned by every player. And deduct their plat instead if they don't have enough kuva. And lock the accounts of those without enough plat too, until they cough up. 😁 Yes, in some point, but they still rolled it not for numbers of stats, but stats itselfes, so quite work have been done anyway finaly, now i don't feel like talking with bots, ty Edited July 28, 2019 by ISMW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corvid Posted July 28, 2019 Share Posted July 28, 2019 9 minutes ago, ISMW said: dudes, it's a game Yes, so why are you treating this like it's such a big deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISMW Posted July 28, 2019 Author Share Posted July 28, 2019 10 minutes ago, Corvid said: Yes, so why are you treating this like it's such a big deal? LOL i'm not treating this like a big deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryim_Drykeon Posted July 28, 2019 Share Posted July 28, 2019 (edited) I've always said that when Riven Disposition changes, previously rolled Rivens should retain their stats. However, the stats should change to the new Disposition upon trade. This would include placing the Riven into the Trade Window. This is the point where Riven Disposition would be changed. If you ask "Why here?", it would be to prevent trade-fraud. The coding may be a bit difficult to implement, but it would solve all the drama. Players that work/pay to get a Riven they like would be able to keep such, just not trade them like that, and any new Rivens introduced would reflect the new Disposition. EDIT:: I'd also use the new Disposition for Kuva Re-Rolls. So if you re-roll after a change, the new roll would reflect the new Disposition. Edited July 28, 2019 by Ryim_Drykeon Addition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vortuna Posted July 28, 2019 Share Posted July 28, 2019 Rivens should never go below 1.0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISMW Posted July 28, 2019 Author Share Posted July 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Ryim_Drykeon said: I've always said that when Riven Disposition changes, previously rolled Rivens should retain their stats. However, the stats should change to the new Disposition upon trade. This would include placing the Riven into the Trade Window. This is the point where Riven Disposition would be changed. If you ask "Why here?", it would be to prevent trade-fraud. The coding may be a bit difficult to implement, but it would solve all the drama. Players that work/pay to get a Riven they like would be able to keep such, just not trade them like that, and any new Rivens introduced would reflect the new Disposition. good solution for both gameplay and econimcal parts of the problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuciol Posted July 28, 2019 Share Posted July 28, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ryim_Drykeon said: I've always said that when Riven Disposition changes, previously rolled Rivens should retain their stats. However, the stats should change to the new Disposition upon trade. This would include placing the Riven into the Trade Window. This is the point where Riven Disposition would be changed. If you ask "Why here?", it would be to prevent trade-fraud. The coding may be a bit difficult to implement, but it would solve all the drama. Players that work/pay to get a Riven they like would be able to keep such, just not trade them like that, and any new Rivens introduced would reflect the new Disposition. That would make it even worse then it already is. The point is to give unpopular weapons an edge, the moment you lock it you lose that functionality. Rivens are a gamble, you should not be compensated for gambling, ever. You have been warned about it multiple times. I would ship rivens removal so hard, like nothing else before but we have what we have, dont make it even worse. Edited July 28, 2019 by kuciol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corvid Posted July 28, 2019 Share Posted July 28, 2019 2 hours ago, ISMW said: LOL i'm not treating this like a big deal There's a 5 page thread that says otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now