Jump to content

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, ChaosSabre said:

Lesser cost on her 1, make her 3 a duration based ability so it can actually be used and make her being able to use weapons or skills during her 4.

As it stands now only way for Hildryn to actually be good is to run the I can't die lel setup.

She's an immortal tank, semi-nuker and support frame all at once

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WoodedSkate89 said:

She's an immortal tank, semi-nuker and support frame all at once

Sure she is. When a single toxin proc can just kill you outright. Never went for nuke build coz I don't wanna forma her.

Edited by ChaosSabre

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Build her properly and you won't ask for a rework for her.  At all.  Fact is there are numerous frames that actually NEED reworks like vauban and ember why should they waste time messing with a frame that they released this year.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, ChaosSabre said:

Sure she is. When a single toxin proc can just kill you outright. Never went for nuke build coz I don't wanna forma her.

Press 2 and it destroys all negative procs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, (XB1)COA Altair said:

Build her properly and you won't ask for a rework for her.  At all.  Fact is there are numerous frames that actually NEED reworks like vauban and ember why should they waste time messing with a frame that they released this year.  

This guy just doesn't read a single thing on this thread except for the topic sentence, then posts a comment as aggressive as this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, (XB1)COA Altair said:

Build her properly and you won't ask for a rework for her.  At all.  Fact is there are numerous frames that actually NEED reworks like vauban and ember why should they waste time messing with a frame that they released this year.  

By that logic neither do Ember nor Vauban. Coz you can use them if they are built properly. Doesn't mean it's a good thing to use. Hell even old Wukong was fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, WoodedSkate89 said:

Press 2 and it destroys all negative procs

If it doesn't instagib you and you got time to cast it to begin with.

Edited by ChaosSabre

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, ChaosSabre said:

If it doesn't instagib you.

True

But I have companions that heal me when I'm low

Edited by WoodedSkate89

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, WoodedSkate89 said:

This guy just doesn't read a single thing on this thread except for the topic sentence, then posts a comment as aggressive as this

No, I just understand how hildryn works in the context of her abilities right now and how to mod her.  She is currently above average powerlevel wise as far as frames go, the only faction she can't handle is infested and there are almost always frames that suck against faction X for reason Y.  If you're hellbent on hildryn being usable against infested, don't be.  Betting nothing will be done about that and that's okay because there's a ton of other frames available to use against infested.  

You can USE anything in your arsenal.  That isn't a great revelation to anybody.  Only restrictions in that regard are needing a rank 30 warframe for arbitration, sortie, or ESO.  If you're looking for the optimal loadout for every mission yeah you aren't using vauban or ember or even hildryn necessarily, but no one is going into every mission in this game with an optimal loadout for said mission.  Because even if you have the perfect loadout for a mission, odds are your teammates don't because they'll have the wrong aura mod, some weapon that could be better, etc. etc. all because this game is based on math/there will almost always be a way to improve your DPS, CC, team synergy, etc. etc.

There is no need for a rework for her.  Rework frames that need it, not frames that aren't even half a year old that perform quite well on the star chart.  

  • Applause 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She's a great tank and support frame - she's fine, leave her alone please.

Thanks

-A Lone Tenno

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, (XB1)COA Altair said:

No, I just understand how hildryn works in the context of her abilities right now and how to mod her.  She is currently above average powerlevel wise as far as frames go, the only faction she can't handle is infested and there are almost always frames that suck against faction X for reason Y.  If you're hellbent on hildryn being usable against infested, don't be.  Betting nothing will be done about that and that's okay because there's a ton of other frames available to use against infested.  

You can USE anything in your arsenal.  That isn't a great revelation to anybody.  Only restrictions in that regard are needing a rank 30 warframe for arbitration, sortie, or ESO.  If you're looking for the optimal loadout for every mission yeah you aren't using vauban or ember or even hildryn necessarily, but no one is going into every mission in this game with an optimal loadout for said mission.  Because even if you have the perfect loadout for a mission, odds are your teammates don't because they'll have the wrong aura mod, some weapon that could be better, etc. etc. all because this game is based on math/there will almost always be a way to improve your DPS, CC, team synergy, etc. etc.

There is no need for a rework for her.  Rework frames that need it, not frames that aren't even half a year old that perform quite well on the star chart.  

Again hasn't read the thread. Look through it all. The amount of assumptions in your first statement are insane. Please read the thread. Then respond

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, WoodedSkate89 said:

Again hasn't read the thread. Look through it all. The amount of assumptions in your first statement are insane. Please read the thread. Then respond

You're asking for buffs on a frame that doesn't need it.  /thread.  I don't have to read beyond the first page for that information because it's obvious that you aren't asking for a hildryn nerf.  They should give attention/man hours to frames that could actually use a real power boost.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, (XB1)COA Altair said:

You're asking for buffs on a frame that doesn't need it.  /thread.  I don't have to read beyond the first page for that information because it's obvious that you aren't asking for a hildryn nerf.  They should give attention/man hours to frames that could actually use a real power boost.  

you refuse to read the thread where some developments are made. So imma stop responding till you do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, WoodedSkate89 said:

you refuse to read the thread where some developments are made. So imma stop responding till you do

Meanwhile, I read the thread, yeah, you're asking for buffs to make her kit more fluid/herself more powerful when she doesn't need a buff because she works as is in the current iteration of warframe just fine, you're just nitpicking things you don't like and thinking hey, let's make her even better when she is already a powerful frame.  DE should not give attention to things like that over real valid content that they are producing in empyrean and such, things the playerbase care far more about then getting a few tweaks on an already powerful frame.  It's a waste of time and money.  

 

Not seeing a frame in public is a horrible metric for knowing how often said frame is played at this point there are so many warframes to choose from you're far more likely to not see a frame then to see it unless it's a meta frame like saryn in ESO for example.  It's also further skewed away from certain frames because they are difficult to obtain in comparison to others and if a new frame just came out you're hella likely to see it in hydron and such because people are leveling the frame.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, (XB1)COA Altair said:

Meanwhile, I read the thread, yeah, you're asking for buffs to make her kit more fluid/herself more powerful when she doesn't need a buff because she works as is in the current iteration of warframe just fine, you're just nitpicking things you don't like and thinking hey, let's make her even better when she is already a powerful frame.  DE should not give attention to things like that over real valid content that they are producing in empyrean and such, things the playerbase care far more about then getting a few tweaks on an already powerful frame.  It's a waste of time and money.  

 

Not seeing a frame in public is a horrible metric for knowing how often said frame is played at this point there are so many warframes to choose from you're far more likely to not see a frame then to see it unless it's a meta frame like saryn in ESO for example.  It's also further skewed away from certain frames because they are difficult to obtain in comparison to others and if a new frame just came out you're hella likely to see it in hydron and such because people are leveling the frame.  

I wouldn't go as far as nitpicking, it's not a priority. They're just little tweaks that I'd like them to sort out as long as possible.

I never made the "in public" point. I rarely play public missions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...