Blaudari Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Didn't DE state before kuva lichs were in the game that the player could toss them to the side once a week for a new lich? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hierarch777 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 I believe that idea was scrapped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dhrekr Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. If they did, they changed their mind. Why does it matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(XBOX)C11H22O11 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 If you could provide a source for that it would be nice cause I don't remember them saying that at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloud Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, (XBOX)C11H22O11 said: If you could provide a source for that it would be nice cause I don't remember them saying that at all I remember people asking for it outloud, not sure about DE promising something like that tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)thowed Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Think they went with the hold to confirm idea instead. It takes a good bit of time to create a lich now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)robotwars7 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 they thought about it, but it seems decided against it, at least for now. there's still a chacne that a Lich Forfeit system of some kind might appear when we get Corpus Liches, but we won't know for sure until they are released in 2021. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)Shaun-T-Wilson Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 As mentioned it was an idea "players" had, DE has acknowledged that idea but haven't agreed or promise it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmberStar Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 For the moment, the only thing along those lines is "If you're worried you'll get a lich you don't like / can't handle... don't make one." IE, the only option is to opt out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(XBOX)CordingMoon7789 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 I would want that option to be in-game because i pressed the x button to reload but for some reason the game took it as if i kept pressed the button and killed the kuva larving and got a kuva nukor instead of the kuva karak i was trying to get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl_3 Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 We got the picture of the weapon floating over the liches head instead, because apparently the wrong weapon is the only reasons that people want to get rid of an unwanted lich. Now we can see the weapon before we create the lich, all is well or so DE says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbstractLemons Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 I think i remember them saying they were messing around with the idea but wanted to focus on 'fixing/making an iteration on the lich system' before deciding if they wanted to implement a Lich forefeit system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiltskillet Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 5 hours ago, (XBOX)C11H22O11 said: If you could provide a source for that it would be nice cause I don't remember them saying that at all I'm too lazy to find the original, but they referred to postponing the feature in the February rework: Quote *Clarification on ‘Abandoning Liches’: We have removed the prototype for this for now, because rather than not fixing the core loop and just letting a Lich be banished, we intend to focus on the core loop first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.