Jump to content

Dev Workshop: Corpus Proxima & The New Railjack


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, smashedwookie said:

Yes its that screen, if this is your grid then you have it fully maxed, you then need 6 piece of equipment. From what Rebecca said in yesterday stream basically as long as you replaced all 6 default part of the ship you'll qualify for that.

Ok, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i get refund of the 24 railjack equipment slot i bought yesterday? :((

i saw the patchnote when i finished grinding the 30 equipment :(((((((

2days wasted

i dont want time back but at least plat?

Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Horathio20 said:

This is contradictory. Do we need to have at least 6 repaired wreckage parts at the time? Or do we need to fill all the slots with something we build? Because as far as I know there are no parts that have wreckage and will fill the ordnance slots, so you need to build something from the dojo research for that. How about the other slots? Would it be enough to build something from the dojo research for that as well?

Looks like we had a similar question :)

41 minutes ago, TwinDrags said:

Rebecca replied to someone asking if the rocket launcher counts as a wreckage and said no. Timestamp of her reply

Though I do want some clarification if that only means the default non-tier rocket launchers, do tier I-III rocket launchers count for Tier 3 Early Adopter reward?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Jacco426 said:

Can i get refund of the 24 railjack equipment slot i bought yesterday? :((

i saw the patchnote when i finished grinding the 30 equipment :(((((((

2days wasted

i dont want time back but at least plat?

I did the same thing, have like 40 slots now. Oh well, its an investment in the future I guess. lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, (XBOX)UnlinkedGiant said:

So whats changing with the railjack reactors

see below

On 2021-03-08 at 3:03 PM, [DE]Rebecca said:

Now - let’s talk about Reactors. They exist to give you Avionics Capacity, and Flux Energy. Both of those things are now removed, so the new role of Reactors is to provide Power Strength, Range, or Duration buffs to Railjack Battle Avionics being used aboard the ship!

Edited by smashedwookie
Link to post
Share on other sites

let’s talk about Reactors. They exist to give you Avionics Capacity, and Flux Energy. Both of those things are now removed, so the new role of Reactors is to provide Power Strength, Range, or Duration buffs to Railjack Battle Avionics being used aboard the ship.

So will you be providing us with the new mods to compensate for the reactor that that we farmed for hours to get. That now you will be removing? Oh will we have to go back and Farm for each individual mod again?

Edited by (PSN)Da_Kine_99
Forgot a sentence
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, (PSN)Da_Kine_99 said:

let’s talk about Reactors. They exist to give you Avionics Capacity, and Flux Energy. Both of those things are now removed, so the new role of Reactors is to provide Power Strength, Range, or Duration buffs to Railjack Battle Avionics being used aboard the ship.

So will you be providing us with the new mods to compensate for the reactor that that we farmed for hours to get. That now you will be removing? 

reactors are not removed, they will be giving Power Strength, Range, or Duration. Notice how there is 3 buff type and 3 type manufacturer of railjack parts

Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, TwinDrags said:

Looks like we had a similar question :)

 

She starts to explain a bit earlier in the stream then the timestamp you link and says if all 6 slots have something you build.... and then says rockets do not count as wreckage. Which is the same contradiction I mention.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, smashedwookie said:

reactors are not removed, they will be giving Power Strength, Range, or Duration. Notice how there is 3 buff type and 3 type manufacturer of railjack parts

That part I understand but I was wondering about the modding, if it's going to be straight standard or is it like how we have, continuity  intensify, and stretch for our Warframe. Will this be mods? and will they be available to us, be purchased or would we have to go out in our railjack and farm them?

I'm excited for this to hurry up and come I just want to be prepared so I could just jump in..ya know👍🥳💯

Link to post
Share on other sites

There ya have it. DE still giving PC preference over console. And I quote Steve, "because we can send updates to PC by the minute." Like many devs (cyber punk 2077) putting emphasis on Pc but not focusing on all platforms equally. Pc will get the 29.10 in a couple of weeks and console not for 3months and still be missing stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, (PSN)Da_Kine_99 said:

That part I understand but I was wondering about the modding, if it's going to be straight standard or is it like how we have, continuity  intensify, and stretch for our Warframe. Will this be mods? and will they be available to us, be purchased or would we have to go out in our railjack and farm them?

I'm excited for this to hurry up and come I just want to be prepared so I could just jump in..ya know👍🥳💯

it should work like it currently does for all the different manufacturer parts but using power/range/duration as the variable stats. Highly doubt there will be mods affecting those stats on top of the ship reactor.

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, (NSW)SLPspace said:

Correct me if im not understanding this right, but if railjack energy will be tied to warframe energy, how will that work with Hildryn or Lavos?

  

On 2021-03-08 at 12:03 PM, [DE]Rebecca said:

What about Lavos / Hildryn, and why Warframe energy - seems scary!
Firstly, Lavos and Hildryn are all up and running with cool downs and Shield-as-energy on Railjack, respectively. Secondly - yeah, it is scary! It’s a big change, and the Warframe Energy economy is a much different world than Flux. There have been some seriously great responses to this part of the Dev Workshop, and when we caveated everything in the workshop with ‘expect changes’, we had it in the back of our minds that this part would be most at risk for thrash. This answer serves one purpose: to let you know what we are reviewing this right now, and we will provide details on any plan revisions when they are final. 

 

Edited by 0x62
i can't operate forums well
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, (XBOX)Vamma Takayn said:

There ya have it. DE still giving PC preference over console. And I quote Steve, "because we can send updates to PC by the minute." Like many devs (cyber punk 2077) putting emphasis on Pc but not focusing on all platforms equally. Pc will get the 29.10 in a couple of weeks and console not for 3months and still be missing stuff.

Because Consoles need to have the updates certified by the console's manufacturers. If the update isn't certified, DE cannot implement the update until it passes the certification. Additionally, PC players are technically the test-cluster for console players. Anything we stumble upon, DE will ship those fixes for the Console players so they don't suffer these issues as much as we do initially.

2 hours ago, TwinDrags said:

Rebecca replied to someone asking if the rocket launcher counts as a wreckage and said no. Timestamp of her reply

Though I do want some clarification if that only means the default non-tier rocket launchers, do tier I-III rocket launchers count for Tier 3 Early Adopter reward?

Components and Armaments (Ordinance included) from the Dry Dock Research do not count because you built them from scratch; they're not Wreckage you found out missions, which you can repair or Valence Transfer. Wreckages are referring to the House Variants of the Armaments and Components (Vidar, Lavan, and Zetki), never the Sigma variants.

Edited by Duality52
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, (XBOX)Vamma Takayn said:

There ya have it. DE still giving PC preference over console. And I quote Steve, "because we can send updates to PC by the minute." Like many devs (cyber punk 2077) putting emphasis on Pc but not focusing on all platforms equally. Pc will get the 29.10 in a couple of weeks and console not for 3months and still be missing stuff.

I mean, they can do it not because they don't value others, but because PCs are generally beefier hardware wise and it's easier to update the server every few minutes. Console updates have to be approved by Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo respectfully before they take effect. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have probably missed it but this seems an important point.  Is the T3 Early adopter gained from having repaired 6 wreckage (which I have done, though most of it was low tier and useless and has been scrapped) or is it requiring all slots filled with repaired wreckage? (which I do not have because the stuff from the dojo is better than some things I have gotten to drop)

Link to post
Share on other sites

damn, I'm not gonna get qualiied for the early adopters, because I didn't know I had to invest into the grid, and not avionics themselves, even though all the avionics I use are maxed out, and every wrekcage slot is filled with stuff I built

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, xDangerCatx said:

Quoting to make sure DE see this, not that I expect them to take it away but just in case...

Without upgrading the turret intrinsics so I have the full view without the ship in the way, gunning would make me really sick.  Hope you're keeping the "visuals" the same when you move the turrets.

Same, the way they worded it on the post has me worried some. Dont want to get sick from someones erratic flying :(

Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, (XBOX)Vamma Takayn said:

There ya have it. DE still giving PC preference over console. And I quote Steve, "because we can send updates to PC by the minute." Like many devs (cyber punk 2077) putting emphasis on Pc but not focusing on all platforms equally. Pc will get the 29.10 in a couple of weeks and console not for 3months and still be missing stuff.

Funny.

 

 

Not the ha, ha version.  More of the "oh lord, why must I read this" kind of funny.

1) PC promises nothing, and the quality upon release with DE is often....less than ideal.

2) Consoles have a lag between updates, because they have to pass qualifications.  Basic qualifications like it won't cause crashes, or prevent login.  Anyone who's played this game long enough will have experienced at least one update that borked things and actually required manually deleting and re-initializing updates.

3) Why exactly do you think there's a PC community versus consoles?  Let me be abundantly clear, it's because DE can push a 60% update and patch.  Remember, a 60% patch with consoles is expensive to push and if it fails certification it'll mean more scrutiny in the future.

 

Now, why do you really want to be a pre-beta tester for DE?  So that you can get the latest content a few days earlier?  Perhaps Railjack 3.0 will finally be what Railjack 1.0 was promised to be about three years ago.  Maybe, this time, it'll not be so buggy that people will make endless memes.  Or far more likely it's another baby step forward that will have immense teething issues, and PC will act as lab rats to more finely tune things.  Oh joy....I get to pay money to get platinum, to have the honor of being a pre-beta tester.

 

 

 

 

My point is that this cuts both ways.  Consoles whine about a later release.  PC whines about all of the utter broken garbage that is "acceptable."  Maybe instead of an exasperated laugh we can just stop this backwards blame game, and simply force DE to be better.  I've tried that for more than 5 years....and I'm not holding my breath about this time being any different.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ScottStaten said:

I have probably missed it but this seems an important point.  Is the T3 Early adopter gained from having repaired 6 wreckage (which I have done, though most of it was low tier and useless and has been scrapped) or is it requiring all slots filled with repaired wreckage? (which I do not have because the stuff from the dojo is better than some things I have gotten to drop)

Their statement was a bit misleading (and should've used "e.g." instead of "i.e.", and it'd still be wrong), since there is no wreckage to repair for the Ordnance slot. It was just used to justify what would otherwise seem like an arbitrary number. "6. Why 6? Because there's 3 component slots and 3 armament slots." So no, you don't need to fill all slots, you just need to have repaired 6 wreckage. If you want to play it safe, have 6 repaired Mk III wreckage in your inventory, but given their loose definition, repaired and then scrapped Mk I wreckage should count as well (keep an eye on further FAQs though).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like a "damage-to-railjack"-system that would force a player to go outside to repair X. Either as a result of specific damage (from bigger enemy ships?) and/or from normal damage left un-repaired, or damage while shields are down. Or something. If such "outside-damage" were coupled to effects on speed, turn radius, gun/gun turret movement, usage of abilities etc. it would create nice and tense "situations".

Just imagine having to park your Railjack close to some suitably sized space debris in order to get some cover from a horde of enemy fighters while having to go outside and repair your engines, as the rest of your team try to keep the enemies at bay.

Streamlined op farming with god-tier equipment is beyond boring, and even failing a mission occasionally is far from the end of the world. So what we really need is some real exciting gameplay, and that translates into hair-raising situations where you hang on by your teeth and failing is a really real option. While not all of the new RJ will be like that, just let something like that exist out in RJ space. 

Edited by Graavarg
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, NPLT said:

damn, I'm not gonna get qualiied for the early adopters, because I didn't know I had to invest into the grid, and not avionics themselves, even though all the avionics I use are maxed out, and every wrekcage slot is filled with stuff I built

None of us knew back then, and that's not why we upgraded our grid ;-) It just made sense in terms of investment. For me, initially it was so I could swap in various Avionics and have them start out at a higher rank due to the upgraded grid slots, vs just upgrading a few Avionics and being stuck with them. Once I figured out which Avionics I wanted I upgraded them. And then later on when I had Dirac to spare, I fully upgraded all grid slots just to get the full effect out of any Avionics I put in them.

As for your current situation, scrap unused wreckage and extra Avionics and go run missions. You should have your grid fully upgraded in no time. Or at least within the next week or two.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Melanholic7 said:

Necramechs sucks. Just saying, Clunky, Slow - they feels very bad. Dunno why you add them here -_-

I felt the same way initially, but during the Orphix Venom event I put a few Forma into both Necramechs, got most of the mods I wanted/needed, and now they're actually fun to play and feel quite powerful. Still a bit clunky though, but that's part of their story, being the older tech that came before Warframes.

Even if you'll never feel that way, there are (more than a few) players out there who do enjoy using them. Why not let them use their Necramechs in Railjack missions? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2021-03-09 at 11:47 AM, [DE]Rebecca said:

What about Lavos / Hildryn, and why Warframe energy - seems scary!
Firstly, Lavos and Hildryn are all up and running with cool downs and Shield-as-energy on Railjack, respectively. Secondly - yeah, it is scary! It’s a big change, and the Warframe Energy economy is a much different world than Flux. There have been some seriously great responses to this part of the Dev Workshop, and when we caveated everything in the workshop with ‘expect changes’, we had it in the back of our minds that this part would be most at risk for thrash. This answer serves one purpose: to let you know what we are reviewing this right now, and we will provide details on any plan revisions when they are final. 

To be honest, I believe the idea of making the Railjack's Battle Avionics reliant on cooldowns instead of being dependent on Flux Energy (currently) and later our own Warframe's/Operator's energy would be a better solution. This is what Tactical Avionics are doing, despite being more of bonus abilities. That frees up the need to equip frames with high energy capacity (i.e Volt Prime, Saryn Prime, Chroma Prime, Wisp, Baruuk, etc.), while having the players use their Battle Avionics more carefully and precisely.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...