Should I make a Primary or Secondary Sporelacer?

[Lord_Chibi]

I recently got a Sporelacer riven and decided "ehh why not" so now it comes to the process of making the actual kitgun, so i need to know, should I use the primary or secondary version? Also, if anyone has a recommendation on what parts would be good that would also help but is less necessary.

[Numerounius]

Secondary,

You'll get the benefit of fulmination as well meanwhile the primary is a shotgun which doesn't have access to firestorm.

As for parts

Splat on both sets,

Tremor for primary, Haymaker for secondary.

The big drawback for the part selection is fire rate but there are fire rate mods you can use. I personally find it hits like a truck so the lack of fire rate doesn't really matter if the enemy is dead in the first shot, used the secondary version to one-shot demolysts after being boosted by roar.

Edited October 1 by Numerounius

[-AncientWarrior-]

I made several of both with different pieces .. great secondary and not a bad primary .. 

[Zakkhar]

1 hour ago, Lord_Chibi said:

Sporelacer riven

Secondary is great, but suffers from not enough slots. Riven with low disposition is really bad idea as it cannot replace any of the staple mods.

I use this build: https://overframe.gg/build/107195/sporelacer/warframe-tier-list-harbinger-of-devastation/

Although I am not sold on Galvanized shot, because it does not affect the radial damage (which is 60% of single target damage). Might have replaced it with Hornet Strike or Fulmination.

Edited October 1 by Zakkhar

[Anonymouse7611]

I built sporelacer as secondary and I'm loving it, but if you have the slots, why not try both and see which you like better?

 

[Pakaku]

I liked both, prefer primary since it's more of an auto bouncy grenade launcher and I can stick Motus Setup on it