Hixlysss Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Event exclusive weapons, such as wraith twin vipers, prova vandal, along side with Skana Prime or even the Boar should be removed from the codex unless you have either A: Maxed out that weapon already or B: Still have the weapon. Personally, I never got around to finish leveling the boar so I'm stuck staring at a half level boar and it bothers me to no end and want it removed.This also has the added benefit of people who don't have the founder primes (Which I still want released to the public.) don't have to stare at them in the codex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobsplosion Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 There's an easy solution if it bothers you. Don't be bothered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Implodingbanana Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Event exclusive weapons, such as wraith twin vipers, prova vandal, along side with Skana Prime or even the Boar should be removed from the codex unless you have either A: Maxed out that weapon already or B: Still have the weapon. Personally, I never got around to finish leveling the boar so I'm stuck staring at a half level boar and it bothers me to no end and want it removed.This also has the added benefit of people who don't have the founder primes (Which I still want released to the public.) don't have to stare at them in the codex. unfortunately for you I THINK the founder primes were announced by DE that they would be exclusive for ever so you cant get the. I don't mean to sound mean but yea that's what i heard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)natek_morzy Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 No. The codex is meant to house information(as far as I can tell). Just because it bothers some individuals does not mean it should change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llyssa Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 It's nice to know they exist. It should, however, be an optional thing that is, by default, off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodHaven Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 ok none of the event weapons are exclusive, DE has openly stated that all of them have a chance to be re-released. Only exclusive items are founders gear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hixlysss Posted April 7, 2014 Author Share Posted April 7, 2014 unfortunately for you I THINK the founder primes were announced by DE that they would be exclusive for ever so you cant get the. I don't mean to sound mean but yea that's what i heard Yes, that is true. DE also stated they would never put in PvP or walking pets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casardis Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 No. The codex is meant to house information(as far as I can tell). Just because it bothers some individuals does not mean it should change. Indeed. Just a little note that the item is exclusive and aren't available anymore would be useful information though, so that people don't have to look it up on other sources but the game's codex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)Darilth Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 (edited) Event exclusive weapons, such as wraith twin vipers, prova vandal, along side with Skana Prime or even the Boar should be removed from the codex unless you have either A: Maxed out that weapon already or B: Still have the weapon. Personally, I never got around to finish leveling the boar so I'm stuck staring at a half level boar and it bothers me to no end and want it removed.This also has the added benefit of people who don't have the founder primes (Which I still want released to the public.) don't have to stare at them in the codex. I want to stare at them for a very long time, xD Personally removing something to me, is like saying it never existed, so having something that doesn't exist kind of defeats the purpose, just my opinion though. It would be nice to have them one day, if people would just get over it (Don't wanna hear go to this post DE said this etc, because we get it, we understand). (I mean heck, I was told their where talks of releasing this on Xbox, but you know how rumors are..... That's another headache in itself....) Edited April 7, 2014 by (PS4)Darilth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitras Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 (edited) I rarely look at the codex, so I'm usually not bothered by it, but I understand where you're coming from.Or maybe, just have an exclusives tab for all of them to go under, which would also remove some of the clutter which is starting to collect in the codex. Edited April 7, 2014 by Vitras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llyssa Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 No. The codex is meant to house information(as far as I can tell). Just because it bothers some individuals does not mean it should change. My J3 golem is gone from the codex, despite having many scans. My old hyena is gone from the codex, despite having many scans. Several mod cards aren't in the codex despite them actually being in my inventory. So there's nothing against removing irrelevant data. It's already been done. There could be an "ancient legacy" section dedicated to things that were otherwise removed, but otherwise, yeah, it doesn't make much sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llyssa Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Yes, that is true. DE also stated they would never put in PvP or walking pets. No, they said that pvp would suck if they did it(and it does) and that walking pets couldn't be done unless they had a wallrun animation that didn't suck(which they do). Pay attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitras Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 ok none of the event weapons are exclusive, DE has openly stated that all of them have a chance to be re-released. Only exclusive items are founders gear. Wrong. That's weapons which are not vandal/wraith. If the weapon is not a special version of an already existing weapon, and is a new weapon, it's not exclusive to that event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phobose Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Event exclusive weapons, such as wraith twin vipers, prova vandal, along side with Skana Prime or even the Boar should be removed from the codex unless you have either A: Maxed out that weapon already or B: Still have the weapon. Personally, I never got around to finish leveling the boar so I'm stuck staring at a half level boar and it bothers me to no end and want it removed.This also has the added benefit of people who don't have the founder primes (Which I still want released to the public.) don't have to stare at them in the codex. Nope. Read Quote below No. The codex is meant to house information(as far as I can tell). Just because it bothers some individuals does not mean it should change. Basically sums it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatoObligato Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Personally I think there should be an option to make exclusive/retired items visible in the Codex, but removing them is certainly not the solution. Maybe a separate Codex tab for exclusives? No, they said that pvp would suck if they did it(and it does) and that walking pets couldn't be done unless they had a wallrun animation that didn't suck(which they do). Pay attention. +1 for you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)natek_morzy Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 My J3 golem is gone from the codex, despite having many scans. My old hyena is gone from the codex, despite having many scans. Several mod cards aren't in the codex despite them actually being in my inventory. So there's nothing against removing irrelevant data. It's already been done. There could be an "ancient legacy" section dedicated to things that were otherwise removed, but otherwise, yeah, it doesn't make much sense. I don't believe removing the Boar from the codex would be irrelevant if a new player saw someone using it and wanted to know what it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizarreFetalChimpanzee Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 There are exclusives that I don't have that whenever I see them, my jimmies remain unrustled. However, I've no real issue with this idea, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodHaven Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Wrong. That's weapons which are not vandal/wraith. If the weapon is not a special version of an already existing weapon, and is a new weapon, it's not exclusive to that event. De has stated openly several times that they are "In the vault" NOT "They are exclusive". Just because the playerbase thinks they are exclusive does not make it a fact. Incase no one ever noticed "Wraith/Vandal" are prime version of non-tenno weapons(Only exception being Lato/Braton vandal which were exclusive to closed beta players). Thats all they are not some exclusive weapon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UmamiSalami Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 A completely different section in the codex exclusively for exclusives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperStarSlayerSeyfert Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 The only weapons that are exclusive are the Founder Gear, Braton vandal, and lato Vandal All the Wraiths, and other Vandals have a Chance to be re-released during other events. Also NO ONE has the Prova Vandal because the Grinner won the Gravidus Event and we got the Machete Wraith instead, so it WILL be released in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llyssa Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 I very much wonder if doing this wouldn't fix arguments like this: https://forums.warframe.com/index.php?/topic/207909-thoughts-on-founder-exclusivity/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now