Jump to content
The Lotus Eaters: Share Bug Reports and Feedback Here! ×

How Melee 2.0 Should Have Looked.


Naqel
 Share

Recommended Posts

There is no proof that melee 2.0 is crappy, but there is proof it's something different.

 

Actually, there's plenty of proof.

 

By now pretty much everyone that posts has posted some complaint over this or that element of the system, be it the controls, lack of functionality, adding even more grind, ect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no proof that melee 2.0 is crappy, but there is proof it's something different.

You want to bring objective proof into subjective matter.

 

Ofc its all opinions cause what else can it be?? You cant be objective when rating something.

 

And as matter of fact there is 1 proof that melee 2.0 sux.

Its goal was to bring melee to gun lvl of effectiveness yet guns are still without any doubt better at dealing dmg to both single and multi targets while having no drawbacks of melee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want to bring objective proof into subjective matter.

 

Ofc its all opinions cause what else can it be?? You cant be objective when rating something.

 

And as matter of fact there is 1 proof that melee 2.0 sux.

Its goal was to bring melee to gun lvl of effectiveness yet guns are still without any doubt better at dealing dmg to both single and multi targets while having no drawbacks of melee.

Yes... I did say it's opinions. (?)

 

And that is not proof, because I can actually survive substantially better with melee only now (I am a solo-only player). Again, it's all opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...