#### Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

• 0

# Antitoxin's True Value -- It's Two Third Of The Original Value!

## Question

In practice, the percentage of the Antitoxin resistance does not truly represent the damage it resists. For example, having a fully modded Antitoxin (45%) will only resist 30  Toxin damage out of 100.

The reason of this is because of how Warframe's health are composed of Flesh, all Warframes are weak to  Toxin damage and receives bonus damage of 50% from that source. Therefore, by default all Warframes will receive 150% damage from  Toxin source.

Using the Antitoxin mod will reduce the bonus damage inflicted linearly instead of multiplicatively. For example, using a fully upgraded Antitoxin (45%) will total the odds between the resisted damage and the original damage by (150%-45%):150% = 105%:150%, or 70%:100%, or 7:10. Therefore, it can be concluded that all Warframe with fully modded Antitoxin only resists 30% instead of 45% of  Toxin damage, which determines the Toxin Resistance's True Value formula to be:

True Value ≈ Value*2/3

EVIDENCE:

Test 1 - Dual Ichor against unmodded Mag: 31 damage (http://puu.sh/bYYU3/a77b75c29e.jpg)

Test 2 - Dual Ichor against Mag with Rank 5 Antitoxin: 21 damage (http://puu.sh/bYZ6M/3e145953f7.jpg)

So, we have:

BasePercentage-ResistedPercentage = ResistanceInPractice

100%-(21/31 * 100%) = 100% - 68% = 32%

And if we compare the Resistance In Practice with Theoritical Resistance (30%)...

ResistanceInPractice : TheoriticalResistance

32% : 30%

Do not be fooled by the description, people -- It's weaker than you think!

## Recommended Posts

Moved to the proper section.

##### Share on other sites

Nein, the damage you resisted are reduced linearly, not multiplicatively. I tried it out myself ingame you can try it yourself in return.

What was the behavior you were expecting?

##### Share on other sites

I like this thread cuz math is involved.

##### Share on other sites

I really hope this is some sort of oversight bug, but then again the evidence to the latter is pretty clear. I feel like DE is just so afraid of congruent scaling - where a Warframe's resistances and strengths remain congruent to and enemies level. One example of what I'm talking about is making Warframe power damage a percentage rather than a static damage number, at which the devs shuddered and shied away from. It really saddens me to see what seems to be a harsh phobia of end-game capabilities, making it so a player's ability to reach high levels is not dependant on skill but rather how many and what way they apply damage mods.

##### Share on other sites

@RealPandemonium
As far as I can guess is I think OP is thinking that the resistance mod works like this:
<base damage> * (1 + (weakness - resistances)) = final damage

And through repeated testing in the dojo I have proved that *false*.
Pure toxic damage with the resistance mod on it is dealing less damage than the base damage of the weapon, instead of 5% higher than the base damage.

The OP doesn't seem to understand how damage is calculated.
The damage is not calculated like this:
<base damage> * (1 + (weakness - resistances))
With numbers used above that would be:
100 * (1 + (0.50 - 0.45)) = 105
This is the wrong formula.

The damage is calculated like this:
<base damage> * (1 + weakness) = <modded damage>
<modded damage> * (1 - resistance) = final damage
With the numbers used above it would be:
100 * (1 + 0.5) = 150
150 * (1 - 0.45) = 82.5
Another way to look at it would be:
(<base damage> - (<base damage> * resistance)) * (1 + weakness) = final damage
With the numbers used above it would be:
(100 - (100 * 0.45)) * (1 + 0.50) = 82.5

The antitoxin mod effect is applied to the *final* damage your frame would take.
Not directly to the weakness of your frame.

##### Share on other sites

Well considering it's a Band Aid Mod in the first place (along with all resistance mods), i don't suppose it would actually work properly

##### Share on other sites

Assuming that the dojo damages are representative (doing 31 instead of ~116), Twilight053 is correct. Seems that the damage reduction is calculated before the damage resistance and then subtracted from the total after damage resistance is applied.

Etc: hitting for 20.5 base; AT removes 9.225 damage; 20.5 base becomes 30.75 damage minus the 9.225 from AT = 21.5 damage, as listed. Then the dr value is only (1-21/31)=32.25%.

Tsukinoki's post is how I'd expect it to be calculated, but it doesn't seem to be acting that way in game.

I encourage interested parties to post SS's rather than positing theories without proof of any kind.

There were somewhere in the patch note that nerfed Toxin Damage to a certain degree in PvP, hence why the damage is so little.

##### Share on other sites

all those elemental resist mods should resist 100% damage otherwise they are useless imo and waste of mod points.

##### Share on other sites

150 - (150 * .45) = 82.5.  82.5 = .55 * 150.  You are resisting 45% of the 150 damage that you received; the mod behaves exactly as advertised.

Nein, the damage you resisted are reduced linearly, not multiplicatively. I tried it out myself ingame you can try it yourself in return.

##### Share on other sites

Remember about tiny amount of armor (except Valkitty) that every frame have.

##### Share on other sites

all those elemental resist mods should resist 100% damage otherwise they are useless imo and waste of mod points.

no, at max it should be 85-90% resistance, otherwise it would break the game easy

##### Share on other sites

@RealPandemonium

As far as I can guess is I think OP is thinking that the resistance mod works like this:

<base damage> * (1 + (weakness - resistances)) = final damage

And through repeated testing in the dojo I have proved that *false*.

Pure toxic damage with the resistance mod on it is dealing less damage than the base damage of the weapon, instead of 5% higher than the base damage.

The OP doesn't seem to understand how damage is calculated.

The damage is not calculated like this:

<base damage> * (1 + (weakness - resistances))

With numbers used above that would be:

100 * (1 + (0.50 - 0.45)) = 105

This is the wrong formula.

The damage is calculated like this:

<base damage> * (1 + weakness) = <modded damage>

<modded damage> * (1 - resistance) = final damage

With the numbers used above it would be:

100 * (1 + 0.5) = 150

150 * (1 - 0.45) = 82.5

Another way to look at it would be:

(<base damage> - (<base damage> * resistance)) * (1 + weakness) = final damage

With the numbers used above it would be:

(100 - (100 * 0.45)) * (1 + 0.50) = 82.5

The antitoxin mod effect is applied to the *final* damage your frame would take.

Not directly to the weakness of your frame.

And here I thought the Antitoxin was applied directly to the resistance stats. Will test this on dojo and mutalist later, sleepy.

##### Share on other sites

explanation

Now I get it.  Thanks for clearing that up, hopefully for both parties.

##### Share on other sites

Hopefully after this is fixed Antitioxin and the others will be viable options. Good catch OP!

Antitoxin is not "broken" in the way the OP describes but it is weird that it maxes at 45% instead of the usual 60, especially when Tenno take 50% more damage from it in the first place.

##### Share on other sites

Assuming that the dojo damages are representative (doing 31 instead of ~95), Twilight053 is correct. Seems that the damage reduction is calculated before the damage resistance and then subtracted from the total after damage resistance is applied.

Etc: hitting for 20.5 base; AT removes 9.225 damage; 20.5 base becomes 30.75 damage minus the 9.225 from AT = 21.5 damage, as listed. Then the dr value is only (1-21/31)=32.25%.

Tsukinoki's post is how I'd expect it to be calculated, but it doesn't seem to be acting that way in game.

I encourage interested parties to post SS's rather than positing theories without proof of any kind.

##### Share on other sites

no, at max it should be 85-90% resistance, otherwise it would break the game easy

How so? Let's say that all of the elemental resistances are set to 100% so you decide to get a little crazy with them. You equip all four of them at once - you're now invulnerable to toxin, fire, cold, and electrical damage.How many enemies are you resistant to in the scope of the game? Maybe about 5 percent at most.

##### Share on other sites

Why are tenno health/resistances nowhere in the game itself.

Why.

Should be in the codex, right?

##### Share on other sites

Nein, the damage you resisted are reduced linearly, not multiplicatively. I tried it out myself ingame you can try it yourself in return.

What exact behavior are you expecting?

It does resist the 45% damage that it says.

Lets take the example 100 damage.

We are weak to toxin at 50%.

100 damage would now deal 150 damage.

So we equip our antitoxin mod.

We now reduce that damage by 45%.

150-(150*.45) = 82.5

Another way to look at this:

(100-(100*.45))*1.5 = 82.5

The damage is now 55% of the damage we would have otherwise suffered.

Please explain in detail exactly what you were expecting the mod to do.

I have tested this in a clan dojo using the embolist for pure toxic damage against a banshee, armor of 15, to avoid having armor reduce the damage more.

And in every single test the damage when they had the antitoxin mod was only 55% of the damage without the antitoxin mod.

EDIT:

Honest question here:

Were you expecting it to completely negate the 50% weakness and then subtract a further 45% from the damage you take?

##### Share on other sites

@RealPandemonium

As far as I can guess is I think OP is thinking that the resistance mod works like this:

<base damage> * (1 + (weakness - resistances)) = final damage

And through repeated testing in the dojo I have proved that *false*.

Pure toxic damage with the resistance mod on it is dealing less damage than the base damage of the weapon, instead of 5% higher than the base damage.

The OP doesn't seem to understand how damage is calculated.

The damage is not calculated like this:

<base damage> * (1 + (weakness - resistances))

With numbers used above that would be:

100 * (1 + (0.50 - 0.45)) = 105

This is the wrong formula.

The damage is calculated like this:

<base damage> * (1 + weakness) = <modded damage>

<modded damage> * (1 - resistance) = final damage

With the numbers used above it would be:

100 * (1 + 0.5) = 150

150 * (1 - 0.45) = 82.5

Another way to look at it would be:

(<base damage> - (<base damage> * resistance)) * (1 + weakness) = final damage

With the numbers used above it would be:

(100 - (100 * 0.45)) * (1 + 0.50) = 82.5

The antitoxin mod effect is applied to the *final* damage your frame would take.

Not directly to the weakness of your frame.

Recent testing with my clanmate shows that your theory is incorrect.

First of all, these are the results of the first experiment. This was done with a Dual Ichor with a Rank 5 Pressure Point against a Mag without antitoxin mod. Result says 31 damage.

The second test was done with a Dual Ichor with a Rank 5 Pressure Point against the same Mag, but with Rank 5 Antitoxin Mod. The results, as calculated, says 21 damage.

Supposedly according to your theory, Antitoxin will resist 45% of the damage. Yet, the resistance percentage shown in the testing completely differs than that. Here are the calculation:

BaseDamage-ResistedDamage = ResistanceInPractice

100%-(21/31 * 100%) = 100% - 68% = 32%

And so, the damage it resisted was nowhere close near 45%. However, if we were to suppose with my theory, Antitoxin will resist two third of the original value, which is 30% of the damage. See where I'm getting? Although the damage percentages aren't exact, it is definitely leaning towards 30%, which is from my theory.

In conclusion: The antitoxin mod effect is not applied to the final damage your frame would take. Instead, directly to the weakness percentage of your frame.

##### Share on other sites

None of those Elemental Resistance mods are worth the real estate in my mod loadouts, anyway.

Not while abilities take up some of those ten slots.

##### Share on other sites

Resistance mods, only useful at the point just before they become useless again.

They simply cannot mitigate enough to matter. If you are getting hit with said element type you are doing something very wrong.

##### Share on other sites

A good thread. It is deceptive in it's true value but is never the less quite useful. I often take it on infested defenses/survivals. Shame it doesn't help our sentinels though :/

##### Share on other sites

On PvP these mods are life savers.... Anti Toxin is a must have because Toxin Damage bypasses shields.

inb4, zNOOO PVP EVAAAR!!1! WARFARM NOT FOR PVP DE PLZ> zOMGWTF!!!!1

##### Share on other sites

Hopefully after this is fixed Antitioxin and the others will be viable options. Good catch OP!

##### Share on other sites

What exact behavior are you expecting?

It does resist the 45% damage that it says.

Lets take the example 100 damage.

We are weak to toxin at 50%.

100 damage would now deal 150 damage.

So we equip our antitoxin mod.

We now reduce that damage by 45%.

150-(150*.45) = 82.5

Another way to look at this:

(100-(100*.45))*1.5 = 82.5

The damage is now 55% of the damage we would have otherwise suffered.

Please explain in detail exactly what you were expecting the mod to do.

I have tested this in a clan dojo using the embolist for pure toxic damage against a banshee, armor of 15, to avoid having armor reduce the damage more.

And in every single test the damage when they had the antitoxin mod was only 55% of the damage without the antitoxin mod.

EDIT:

Honest question here:

Were you expecting it to completely negate the 50% weakness and then subtract a further 45% from the damage you take?

OP doesn't know enough about damage application and mitigation in the game so yes, he expected the mod to disregard the extra damage we take from the element. He's isn't the only one either as evidenced by the replies here