Alphafox Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 I find the buffs quite underwhelming.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gammaion Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 What a waste of a potato(e)s. These weapons will be completely useless after this. 50 ammo seems fairer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnProdman Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 I'm probably not the only one to find the changes absolutely irrelevant. I use a carrier and never drop below 10 ammo from the max in any of the nerfed weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidathe Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 (edited) Yes, you can because they aren't a real word, don't have a true definition. Maybe you should study what a real word means. :v Power Creep isn't located inside of Webster. And I doubt Webster would host words typically used in video game communities. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twinking As for twinking, a lot of places say the same thing (In relation to video games and not an act of the eye). And as for every platform, yeah. They have their own words. We all also share terms because we are all, collectively, one big group and therefore need cross-platform words, such as power creep, twink, and the ever classical troll. And finally, what is occurring hopefully turns out well, and if not, lets work on how to fix 'em up then. Edited August 9, 2014 by Sidathe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gammaion Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 (edited) Power creep isn't really relevant here, though. They are rocket weapons and are supposed to deal high damage. Oh well, at least I can go get a Vulkar once this rolls out. Always loved the look of that weapon. Edited August 9, 2014 by Gammaion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xNegikunx Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 Justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neogeo Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 Now that the ammo efficient is gone. Maybe its time to take a look at the self afflicted damage part as well. The dps alone is not worth dying over it, no pun intent. Also, LOL at Tories. The bastard child of launcher is getting the short end of the stick treatment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArsVampyre Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 More nerfs to suit PvP over PvE. Rather than nerf it just for PvP, they're going to ruin it for everyone. Again. First, they promised no PvP. Then they promised they'd never balance the game for PvP. Then they promised they'd never balance the game for PvP over PvE. How many more times will DE break their promises? Stupid. Stupid after stupid after stupid after stupid. DE never learns their lesson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaugahn Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 More nerfs to suit PvP over PvE. Rather than nerf it just for PvP, they're going to ruin it for everyone. Again. First, they promised no PvP. Then they promised they'd never balance the game for PvP. Then they promised they'd never balance the game for PvP over PvE. How many more times will DE break their promises? Stupid. Stupid after stupid after stupid after stupid. DE never learns their lesson. You realize this nerf is intended for PvE, right? They balance PvP separately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)Count_Dante Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 More nerfs to suit PvP over PvE. Rather than nerf it just for PvP, they're going to ruin it for everyone. Again. First, they promised no PvP. Then they promised they'd never balance the game for PvP. Then they promised they'd never balance the game for PvP over PvE. How many more times will DE break their promises? Stupid. Stupid after stupid after stupid after stupid. DE never learns their lesson. Wrong. PvP has nothing to do with it. Break their promises? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunsmoke77 Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 (edited) What the hell am i reading why water down ammo for guns we try to mod ? the aim the game is mod the guns yes no so why would i play a game to mod guns i.e.clip sizes ammo to have it water down ? Edited August 9, 2014 by gunsmoke77 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlebbyMilliner Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 This might make for some interesting builds and actually start using ammo capacity mods, or in the case of the Angstrum the mod that slows down the fire rate to just get 1 rocket out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gammaion Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 Because filthy casuals. People seems to forget that Angstrum, is a secondary. When you want a secondary to be as strong as primary like Ogris and Penta, you should know something's wrong. Waiting for Brakk and Marelok nerf as well. I don't think Brakk deserves a nerf. It can be an extremely hard to get weapon with lots of RNG involved. It should be a fantastic reward for all that hard work, like it is right now. Marelok... on the other hand, is much better than its primary version, Grinlok. That isn't right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)DesecratedFlame Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 I don't think Brakk deserves a nerf. It can be an extremely hard to get weapon with lots of RNG involved. It should be a fantastic reward for all that hard work, like it is right now. Marelok... on the other hand, is much better than its primary version, Grinlok. That isn't right. Brakk is the secondary that needs nerfed the hardest. It can out DPS most, if not all, primaries. If we are going by the concept that a secondary should be weaker than a primary then then it should be first on the chopping block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now