Allow Void Defence Invites If Someone Leaves At A Reward Wave

[0Pinger]

Lots of griefing reports going on about void defence voters at wave 5/10 etc choosing the reward at very last second leaving the team one or more players down than expected.

 

So if that happens, allow the team to fill the spot/spots with replacement/s.

[Kestral9999]

It's crap, not only should they allow you to invite players at any point to an endless mission if there is a slot open, but they also need to make it so that your decision is locked at the three second timer.

[Adaptor-Face]

agreed, but then we might need access to recruiting while in mission aswell.

[Casardis]

The reason why they removed that is because of exploits. Someine who left could be invited again to continue and collect as many rewards as they wanted. I'm just not sure why they did that to survival as well since those rewards are cumulative.

[Agullimux]

Only reasonable thing would be allowing new or same player join if player disconnected without getting reward. Also removing dc all players if host leaves after key is used. (troll leave at rewards)

[ClockworkSpectre]

If they worked it out so you couldn't invite the person that just left it may work out.  The problem is the potential exploit if you could re invite the person that left. 

[Nira]

It's crap, not only should they allow you to invite players at any point to an endless mission if there is a slot open, but they also need to make it so that your decision is locked at the three second timer.

 

This would be great. Lost count of how many times half the team decides to sod off at the last second, leaving the remaining one or two to fail and get nothing.

[Azakeroth]

Well i dont see no reason not to allow inviting, they did change the matchmaking where if you leave the squad in the mission, you cant enter again until the mission is over and a new one is started, that alone prevents the exploit of claiming the reward and joining again.