FireOnMe Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Two weeks, eighty hours, eighty dollars (Prime Access), definitely a good game. I should not purchase Diablo III and just play warframe. I totally understand that, this game is free to play and having your own servers in different countries could be costly. If you set up official servers this game might no longer be free. Fair enough. So, how about letting gamers have their own servers, just like what EA has done in Battlefield? For instance, a clan could rent a server which allows 40 sessions in the same time. Then everyone's happy and could have stable, fast connection. No more lag (okay sometimes). This would also allow you to have 8v8 or even 16v16 in pvp. And... you are not going to pay for this! (If this suggestion is not appropriate, or already got denied, please simply remove this thread, thanks :) ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClockworkSpectre Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 (edited) There are free to play games that manage to provide dedicated servers. Just being free to play does not count that out. And especially with their new partnership(and probably before it) I think DE could afford servers they just have chosen not to. Edited October 16, 2014 by ClockworkSpectre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kestral9999 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Me personally? Nah, I've never considered adopting third party servers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHog Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 That would make it easier to get the server coding and running (public) private servers with their own cash shop and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannamancer Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynxh Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 (edited) Having your third party servers is not gonna magically enable 16vs16 though XD. Honestly, I stay away from third party servers for specific reasons. Not that the current situation is that great, but I don't run into enough problems to embrace this alternative which has it's own downsides (speaking from my personal experience with third party servers in general) That said, it's certainly something worth checking out for DE, though I am sure they visited that idea among themselves before. Personally, I'd say no. But It's not without reason, and fully aware of the ups and downs of such a direction. Edit: Added the Personal touch Edited October 16, 2014 by Lynxh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryokuzaki Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoMbi656 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 (edited) No, noway. Just believe it's a bad idea. Edited October 16, 2014 by ZoMbi656 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vunie Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 theres nothing wrong with the servers so theres no reason to do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archistopheles Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Third party servers? No, but they've considered third party ownership. nyuk nyuk nyuk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatchias Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 I sure do love seeing people just saying "No" without providing reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now