Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

pauli133

Codex relic descriptions: please stick to one order to list planets in

Recommended Posts

While updating the wiki today, I noticed that the relic descriptions in the codex have noticeable inconsistencies in the way they present information - specifically, the order of planets.

Below are two examples, but it seems to be all over the place.

JOJteoS.jpg

Jz7FUlC.jpg

V1: Sedna, Eris, Europa, Derelict, Lua, Ceres, Jupiter, Phobos, Mars, Uranus, Neptune, Void, Saturn, Pluto.

S3: Derelict, Earth, Eris, Lua, Europa, Void, Mars, Phobos, Jupiter, Sedna, Ceres, Saturn, Uranus, Venus, Neptune, Pluto.

 

This is sloppy, and makes it harder for players to compare the information that you clearly want us to have.

Listing them in some sort of standard order would be a significant improvement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I think the codex information of the relics are useless seeing that every relic drops everywhere. Now we have no dilution for prime parts anymore we have a dilution of relic drops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yah - either order the planets in distance from the sun (difficulty/level) or alphabetical order.  Either is fine, but it does need to be consistent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...