EWar Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 50 minutes ago, [DE]Glen said: Ok I think we have enough data from the latest drivers, thanks. If you're willing to try something older than 378.48 and newer than 376.53 we might be able to box it in for Nvidia: 378.78 and 378.66 both leak on my GTX 980. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[DE]Glen Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 23 minutes ago, EWar said: 378.78 and 378.66 both leak on my GTX 980. Okay like I said I'm looking for older versions -- we want to know the first version that introduced the leak: 1 hour ago, [DE]Glen said: Ok I think we have enough data from the latest drivers, thanks. If you're willing to try something older than 378.48 and newer than 376.53 we might be able to box it in for Nvidia: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annoying_killah Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) AMD PC Setup: CPU: AMD FX-8320 3,5 Ghz GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 FTW 8GB MB: Asus M5A97 R2.0 ATX AM3+ RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury, DDR3 (1600MHz) 16GBOS: Windows 10 Pro 64 bitNvidia Driver Version 378.78 3 (1920x1080) Monitors I play the game on borderless fullscreen mode, PhysX always on. Start 30 Minutes 1 Hour Edited March 13, 2017 by Annoying_killah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cx-dave Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 20 minutes ago, [DE]Glen said: Okay like I said I'm looking for older versions -- we want to know the first version that introduced the leak: It started with 378.xx. First WHQL for that was 378.49. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fylas Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2 hours ago, [DE]Glen said: Ok I think we have enough data from the latest drivers, thanks. If you're willing to try something older than 378.48 and newer than 376.53 we might be able to box it in for Nvidia: 378.78 on everything leaks 378.66 on GTX 950 leaks 378.48 on GTX 980Ti SLI or GTX 1080 leaks ... ? ... 376.53 on GTX 970 does not leak 375.95 on GTX 1080 does not leak 376.53 on GTX 970 does not leak ? are you sure about that? I got a 970 too if you got driver versions you need confirmations for the 970 I wouldn't mind trying them out :O! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[DE]Glen Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) + 378.49 confirmed leaking 376.33 confirmed leaking (less?) There is some dispute about the 376 series -- more data might help. Edited March 13, 2017 by [DE]Glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fylas Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) 32 minutes ago, [DE]Glen said: + 378.49 confirmed leaking 376.33 confirmed leaking (less?) There is some dispute about the 376 series -- more data might help. what length of running do you need? 20 minutes minimum? 30 minutes each? since it's confirmed it's phys x I can skip the disabled phys x test right? just gimme a from to version number and the time frame and I get you the data for the 970 done. okay.... I got a issue I can't find any drivers for anything between 378.49 January 24, 2017 and 376.33 December 14, 2016 where the heck can I find any versions from in between`? I can't seem to find any sources to download drivers between those version numbers ;_; Edited March 13, 2017 by Fylas missing source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[DE]Glen Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) 376.19 leaked 2GB in 15 minutes here. 376.09 the same 375.95 leaked about 3GB in 20 minutes 373.06 does not seem to be leaking 15 minute runs seem enough given how big the leak is. Edited March 13, 2017 by [DE]Glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[DE]Glen Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 37 minutes ago, Fylas said: what length of running do you need? 20 minutes minimum? 30 minutes each? since it's confirmed it's phys x I can skip the disabled phys x test right? just gimme a from to version number and the time frame and I get you the data for the 970 done. okay.... I got a issue I can't find any drivers for anything between 378.49 January 24, 2017 and 376.33 December 14, 2016 where the heck can I find any versions from in between`? I can't seem to find any sources to download drivers between those version numbers ;_; http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us should have a decent amount of history -- we have someone in QA going back one version at a time right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[DE]Glen Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 OK! Internal tests have isolated the first bad driver as GeForce Game Ready Driver WHQL 375.63 October 23, 2016 With the previous version as fine! GeForce Game Ready Driver WHQL 373.06 October 6, 2016 This was with a GTX 480 -- if we could get a few more different cards to test these two versions to verify our findings that would be super great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fylas Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, [DE]Glen said: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us should have a decent amount of history -- we have someone in QA going back one version at a time right now. when I search for my 970 in the 900 series 64 bit windows, I get absolutely nothing between 378.49 and 376.33 1 hour ago, [DE]Glen said: OK! Internal tests have isolated the first bad driver as GeForce Game Ready Driver WHQL 375.63 October 23, 2016 With the previous version as fine! GeForce Game Ready Driver WHQL 373.06 October 6, 2016 This was with a GTX 480 -- if we could get a few more different cards to test these two versions to verify our findings that would be super great! edit : okay I try those two on the 970 373.06 9.16.0318 phys x version Start Spoiler Odd effect, figured I snap Spoiler end, 20 minutes Spoiler I did a clean reinstall but if I check nvidia control system info it still shows , Did I screw up somehow or is this normal behavior for downgrading on nvidia when your not flat out reinstalling the entire system? Since the installer for 373.06 confirmed the installed version to be 373.06 here's the test with the 375.63 on the 970 , sorry the second picture is a bit botched but you can see the runtime by the difference in the taskbar clock >_< it's 2 am here Q_Q Start Spoiler End Spoiler I hope this help,s all tests where done at the 20 minute mark to allow for even comparison. Edited March 14, 2017 by Fylas new info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriegsherr Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 6 hours ago, [DE]Glen said: Hard to tell from such a short run -- but that said I think there's a small leak with the Juggernaut's spikes that I should look into one day. Yeah I did another test run just to be safe, this time a one hour survival vs orokin with no juggernauts involved, and the results were almost identical. I unchecked both DirectX 10 and 11 before hand and my initial HEAP goes down to about 505 Mb, but around 30-40 min it gets to 800, bordering 900 around the 1 hour mark. Task manager shows around 2-2,2 GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kraantion Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 Can't wait to try it on my 2 gigs of RAM, and on my awesome GeForce 9500GT outdated graphics card! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcatraz Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 (edited) Not sure if it matters since it's been Nvidia related leaks for the last year or so but, here's my test on AMD GPU. I have an MSI R7 360 O.C Edition 2gb GDDR5. (AMD GPU) PC has 20gb 1866mhz O.C Ram (Kingston HyperX Fury) After the first 30 minute test using my regular settings. My in game was sitting pretty solid at 580 at start was 560. Commit at start was .7 GB and after test it was .9gb So I tested again for 5.5 hours on maxed settings throughout Warframe. Beginning at 560 in game RAM. Commit at 1gb, I went to bed and woke back up and checked again: 580 RAM solid and hasn't moved any. Commit was solid at 1.2gb I notice my in game RAM goes up over 10xx MB when I've changed a lot of things in my dojo or in hard play missions such as 1+ hour survivels but I do not experience any lag or anything bogging down after that long of a period. Good luck to everyone using Nvidia, may you narrow the leak down to a point. Edited March 15, 2017 by Alcatraz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberhazard Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Heh, I know that I would need to update my graphical drivers BUT interesting enough, when I update my AMD 6600M/6700M Drivers, Warframe doesn't recognize them so I can't launch the game. So I'm stuck with years old drivers to keep playing warframe sadly. Won't stop me, even if my laptop is old and I can't replace it. Main issues I have is on my end. Laptop getting really hot and overheating in some cases, even with external powerful fan to help it cool down. it started like that a bit before The Second Dream update. but well, still playable I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fylas Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 6 hours ago, Cyberhazard said: Heh, I know that I would need to update my graphical drivers BUT interesting enough, when I update my AMD 6600M/6700M Drivers, Warframe doesn't recognize them so I can't launch the game. So I'm stuck with years old drivers to keep playing warframe sadly. Won't stop me, even if my laptop is old and I can't replace it. Main issues I have is on my end. Laptop getting really hot and overheating in some cases, even with external powerful fan to help it cool down. it started like that a bit before The Second Dream update. but well, still playable I guess. have you tried disabling the new atmospheric lighting? it should have been a auto active option when it was added so even on a low detail custom setting it would still be active and quite taxing on your heat management. check display tag , volumetric lighting , should be the fifth option under graphic quality :O! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberhazard Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 (edited) 19 hours ago, Fylas said: have you tried disabling the new atmospheric lighting? it should have been a auto active option when it was added so even on a low detail custom setting it would still be active and quite taxing on your heat management. check display tag , volumetric lighting , should be the fifth option under graphic quality :O! Yeah, I already messed with the graphical options, I'm on custom, everything is in now, ( and the game is still beautifull ) the first time the atmospheric lighting was activated ( and last time for me ) due to the war within quest update, I was feeling like my laptop was on the verge of exploding x') Others infos, the in the task manager process, the game use a normal ammount of ram, in game, it start around 500 and end up at 860, and goes from one to another, not very dramatic tho', even normal in my eyes due to the state of my Laptop, my only issue is the heat and I'm sure it's not a problem related to the game but my machine itself. Interesting enough , since a week more or less, sometimes when I launch the game, my whole pc will become frozen and needs to be rebooted ( the launcher doesn't even appear, it just freeze before it ) annoying but still managable. Just gonna put my specs here, you'll laugh Processor: AMD A8-3510MX APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics 1,80 Ghz (quad cores) Ram: 8Go System: OS(Windows 10) x64bits , Processor x64 Graphical Cards: AMD Radeon 6600m & 6700m Series AMD Radeon HD 6620G This laptop is a relic of the old times, maybe from the Orokin Empire ! Edited March 16, 2017 by Cyberhazard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiryu486 Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 grineer.outbreak works as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taiiat Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 13 hours ago, Cyberhazard said: Just gonna put my specs here, you'll laugh Processor: AMD A8-3510MX APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics 1,80 Ghz (quad cores) Ram: 8Go System: OS(Windows 10) x64bits , Processor x64 Graphical Cards: AMD Radeon 6600m & 6700m Series AMD Radeon HD 6620G the latest available Video Drivers for your APU may be found here:http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/Notebook-APU-Drivers.aspx according to the 64-Bit w10 page, you should let Windows Update check and install the latest Drivers for your APU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trickyburn Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 1080 user and can confirm dropping back to decembers update stops the leaks, was wondering why everything was crashing after a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infamystoops Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 (edited) On 3/9/2017 at 0:37 PM, Sannidor said: Can we have some other secret test "emails"? For science grineer.outbreak also works but grineer instead of corpus didn't realise that juggernaut could spawn in test... or manics Edited March 17, 2017 by Infamystoops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kidiv Posted March 19, 2017 Share Posted March 19, 2017 I'll make a screensaver from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
main_antagonist Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basqui Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 (edited) Got a notification for a new nvidia driver 378.92 Edited March 21, 2017 by Basqui Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nep_Blanc Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Basqui said: Got a notification for a new nvidia driver 378.92 I installed it yesterday gonna test now it does not deliver a new binary of physx tho Chao, The Roaring Lion Edited March 21, 2017 by TheRoaringLion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts