Does Anyone Actually Believe Waiting 84 Hours For a Warframe to Build is a Good Thing?

[Runecrafting]

21 minutes ago, PrVonTuckIII said:

No one, except you, thinks that this is a good idea.

That's because people that don't want to wait have quit.

 

30 minutes ago, PrVonTuckIII said:

1) Lolwut? Warframes are far from the most resource-intensive thing in the game

2) I'd rather have build times, and being able to do whatever I please during that time

You would have 84 "less" hours to farm for resources. Less waiting, less farming, and higher resource usage. 

Without build times, you would still be able to do whatever you please, but with your new shiny toy. Not sure how build times would grant more freedom. You aren't a slave to a new piece of gear.

 

25 minutes ago, PrVonTuckIII said:

so in the end, you are -objectively- wrong

No, we're being presented with only half of the story here. The players that were turned off by build times aren't playing the game. So there's no reason they would be on these forums.

 

Anyways, I'm done discussing it. We're never going to change each others opinions on the matter. Was a good discussion, though.

[Runecrafting]

7 hours ago, (PS4)Elvenbane said:

If a new player can't manage to entertain themselves for 3 days while a new frame is building, they aren't sticking around.

http://www.statisticbrain.com/attention-span-statistics/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/12/humans-have-shorter-attention-span-than-goldfish-thanks-to-smart/

http://time.com/3858309/attention-spans-goldfish/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/22/opinion/the-eight-second-attention-span.html?_r=0

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/our-attention-span-is-now-less-than-that-of-a-goldfish-microsoft-study-finds-10247553.html

The average attention span is less than 9 seconds.