Jump to content

Stoogedoobis

PC Member
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stoogedoobis

  1. Just received my collectible in the mail today and I gotta say, it looks really cool. Unfortunately mine was not handled all that well and a few fingers on his right hand (hand that holds skana) broke off during shipping. Looks like i'll be getting out the hot glue gun so he can be to his full glory.

  2. ...Could you BOTH have missed the point of this thread ANY more?

    We arent the only ones to have strayed off. I do hope for a slight buff to lex prime, but I am going to use it regardless because I love how it feels to use.

  3. You are talking about a rifle that uses bullets with casings. Flintlock rifles did not however.

    I love the grinlok's style, and I do agree it is weaker than it seems it should be. At this point in the game i am basically going to use my melee and lex prime only.

  4. this is not some improvised weapon, its a beast, and this is not real life where te stronger the weapon the better it is, in a video game unlike real life you are trying to get balance and a chalange, so stop comparing real life to video games in any way, just stop

    You dont get what I am saying at all, do you? I am just saying grinlok has no reason to be stronger than marelok. If there was balance id be using my lato instead of my marelok 45 minutes into a t3 solo survival run.

  5. For all you scrubs who dont k ow why marelok is stronger than marelok here is a brief lesson. The marelok is based off of a real gun that was nicknamed the "mare's leg". It was called such because of its short and bulky appearance. That appearance is due to the fact that soldiers would take their rifle (flint...or grinlok in this case) and cut off the barrel like a sawed off shotgun to increase power, reduce size (so as to use as a sidearm), but decreased accuracy. Marelok is where it should be damage-wise compared to the grinlok but is still a ridiculously strong gun. Thank you and good night

  6. That's why 0% taxation is a bad idea. You need to entice others with higher battle pay so you need the funds. Your node will always get contested, there is no way around it. The clans/alliances who have their nodes right now need to learn that taxing isn't bad, it will help them keep their node. You get a bonus anyways from the Dark Sector so there is no reason not to at least put a 5% tax up.

  7. What it is right now is that all the clans/alliance with 0% can't really pay battle pay. 0% is a bad idea...people will always want to contest for a Dark Sector so you need those taxes so you can pay people to fight for you. Poor planning for all those who have rails up right now.

  8. I have no idea where this should go, but here it is. During missions in the void (any but defense) I have had a glitch happen to me twice. This glitch makes me phase through a wall in an area of the map (has the two giant electro balls, will post link to pics)and get stuck indefinitely, forcing me to abandon the mission. The glitch seems to occur when I try to wallrun on the side of the wall and I hover for a second then phase in. While extremely funny, I can not stress enough how much of an inconvenience it can be (especially when I am carrying the data for MD's).

     

    Link to pics:http://imgur.com/4ttvLsz,5ZJ6wSO,fuHFbR6,MgPP98j

×
×
  • Create New...