DarkKnight271
-
Posts
123 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by DarkKnight271
-
-
2 minutes ago, DatDarkOne said:
Let me ask you something. Do you know exactly what happens when you have a 32 bit OS on a system with more than 4 gigs of ram? Also if you do, then do you know how to avoid what usually happens from happening?
I only ask this question to see where you head is at. You don't have to answer it at all. This question also is kind of related to aspects of his topic as well.
Yes, and I'm curious why that matters at all? Again, I'm not debating if a game "could" be run on a GTX1050 ti, I'm pointing out that a GTX1050 ti can't "play any game at max graphics" like the other poster had claimed. There's no debate. Fallout 4, Battlefield 1, Watch Dogs 2 and several others won't run, or won't run well because of frame drops and stuttering, on the GTX1050 ti just can't handle the graphics being set to max (or ultra or whatever you want to call it) settings.
If you start tweaking the graphics, lowering the settings, or turning off things like shadows and reflections then you're no longer running the game at "max graphics" like the poster claimed.
Perhaps you need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills since you seem to keep wanting to take this somewhere other than where it is.
-
46 minutes ago, DatDarkOne said:
I jumped in because some of things you said either were wrong or didn't matter in every case. Which I was pointing out to you that you seemed to have overlooked when giving out your "expert" advice. 😛
Nothing I said was wrong.
-
6 hours ago, DatDarkOne said:
Uhh, you do know that Fallout 4 is also a 3-4 year old game. One that is also badly optimized. So I wouldn't use it as an example for your case.
Anyway there aer just some graphics settings or options that just really aren't needed or important to gameplay that can usually be turned down or off. RayTracing just happens to be the newest one to come up. For the longest time detailed shadows was the one I always turned down because it just wasn't something I needed and would receive a performance boost when turning it down. As Resolutions keep increasing, Anti-aliasing is another that is becoming redundant.
I do and whether the game is well optimized or not just doesn't matter to the point I was making. That you can't "play any game at max graphics" on a GTX1050 ti card is the point I was making. There are other games that I've been told about as well, but I don't remember the names since I don't play them. As a side note, Fallout 4 plays just fine on my GTX1060 and a friends GTX1080.
And again, I wasn't talking about optimizing graphics settings for maximum performance (you may want to follow the conversation better before jumping in), I was pointing out that there are games that you can't play on max graphics on the GTX1050 ti because it's a budget card and doesn't have a much RAM as higher end cards to load textures and such.
-
20 hours ago, Toppien said:
i played arkham knight at full graphics with a 760, at 50 fps the 1050 ti is better
i can play witcher 3 max graphics, at 50 FPS with the 1050 ti, overcloked my processor (its a core i5 3th or 4 th generation i dont remember XD) a little and now runs at 60 fps even at the big city (novigrad is called i think) and that is the fire test for that game
i can play titanfall 2 at max graphics with the 4 gigs or vram budget, at 60 fps no visible lack of quality in textures (unless you want to really sniff at those walls XD)
SC2 i can play the co-op maps at 60 fps, going to 45-40 on really heavy fights
i could say i play warframe at max graphics and doom, but those two are really good optimized, so they dont count
dont give me the bs fallout 4 needs a powerfull graphics card with alot of VRAM cuz bethesda games have S#&$ engines with bad optimization since skyrim, with dlc that have really high resolution textures? yeah sure, but their "high quality texture" dlc is S#&$ compared to what any modder does with the same resolutions and are less VRAM heavy
and if you want your harware to last longer, overclocking is the solution for it XD, just make sure you have a good enough coolant system and dont overvoltage too much, i know i made my 650ti last so much as to play, well not max graphics, but kinda medium-high graphics, until 2016, where i had to buy the 760, but my 760 was just a really poor designed card so it burned, so i bought my 1050 ti and ive never been more happier 😄
Dude, all the games you mentioned are at least 3 or 4 years old. StarCraft 2 is 8, going on 9, years old. I would hope that a 2 year old graphics card, even a budget card, could play those games well. But you're not even getting 60fps on those older games? So that means that it couldn't run those games at 120fps or 144fps and probably loses a lot of performance if you have two monitor or more hooked up to your computer. But, like I've been saying, the GTX1050 ti is a budget card. It's not bad but your claim that it can "run any game with max graphics" is just wrong. Fallout 4 is an example of this, despite what you think about the company behind it Fallout 4 is a game that the GTX1050 ti can't run at max graphics and I'm sure there are more that I'm not remembering.
-
On 2019-01-08 at 2:56 PM, Toppien said:
the question is, do you really need that much memory for textures, cuz i dont, and even if the game needs it , you really cant tell the difference between a game that usess 3.5-4 GB or Vram or a game that uses more than that.
lets take for example titanfall, game is texture heavy sure but with 4 GB you really dont notice any lack of quality in textures
The answer in some cases is, YES.
Lets take Fallout 4 for instance. If you don't have a graphics card with 8GB of RAM you can't run the game at max graphics. And yes, that's at 1080 resolution. It literally won't play because the game can't load the graphics into VRAM. I think the best you can get is medium level graphics. There are other games as well where this is the issue. And while some people may not be able to tell the difference between medium and ultra level graphics I think most people can.
So if you're looking to future proof your purchase and make sure you're going to be able to run games for a longer time, make sure you get a graphics card that has at least 6GB of RAM, or if you can afford it, 8GB of RAM. If you don't mind running games at medium and lower graphics settings then a graphics card with 4GB of RAM will be fine.
So, to restate it, a GTX1050ti is a good budget card but it can't "play any game with max graphics" like you so incorrectly claim.
-
16 hours ago, Toppien said:
same goes for 16-18 core processors, you never get to use the full potencial of those unless you are running a server
This is also not true.
There are video editing and rendering programs out there that can and will take advantage of multicore processing.
-
16 hours ago, Toppien said:
you can perfectly play any game with max graphics with a GTX 1050 ti or even a GTX 1070 (if you want to use your television instead of a monitor) any hardware more powerfull than that is for unoticeable gimmicks like nvidia hairworks or RTX, or physx
This is just wrong.
A GTX105ti is a really good budget card but it cannot "play any game with max graphics". The GTX1070 should be able to play most games at max graphics, but the 1050 only has 4GB of RAM so there are a few games out there where it can't load the textures and can't play the game at max graphics. The 1070 is the first card in the nvidia line that has 8GB of RAM across the board (The GTX1060 has a 6GB version that should do fine for most games at max graphics as well) and should have enough RAM to load the textures into the graphics card. The GTX1080ti and RTX2080ti both have 11GB of RAM but for 99% of uses, 8GB should be enough to run a game at max graphics settings.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, _Euphoria_ said:
Tried both resetting my router several times and optimized the game. Didn't help.
I guess I should send a ticket to suport.
If you haven't done it for a while, try updated your router's firmware (assuming you're not renting your router from your ISP). Once you've done that, Do a hard reset of the router to take it back to it's default settings and then reconfigure your WiFi and security settings. Even if you can't update the firmware you may want to try that.
-
2 minutes ago, LSG501 said:
No... If you want battle royale go play another game which is designed for battle royale, warframe is already starting to get too diluted from it's original core game as it is.
Why do people feel the need to force every genre of game into warframe even though the majority of us came to the game without any intention of playing anything but PvE...
Because people like to bring ruin to the things other people enjoy. PvP is what ruined Destiny and The Division. And having an almost complete lack of PvP (or at least a PvP mode that can be avoided entirely) is what makes me love Warframe.
-
14 hours ago, KreekNaaglash said:
it's not like its gonna actually happen its just the idea we are talking about here
And the idea of putting an awful game mode like Battle Royale into Warframe is stupid.
-
15 hours ago, KreekNaaglash said:
battle royale where you drop out of your spaceship, I mean with the movement and fighting/gun mechanism I think it would be on the top of battle royale scene
No. Never. Not every game needs to be some PvP meat grinder. Warframe is fine being PvE. If you want to play some idiotic battle Royale game go play one and leave Warframe continue to be a game for those of us who don't want anything to do with those kinds of pathetic games.
-
1 hour ago, _Euphoria_ said:
Okay so it seems like my problem isn't specific to eidolon hunts but happens when a mission takes too long. I also get ERROR 10054 everytime right before I get disconnected. This is really frustrating I can't play any mission that lasts mroe than 15 mins
Reset your modem/router and also optimize your game files.
-
Of the frames I own (because I don't own them all yet)
Volt: It just never fit my play style.
Ash: I guess I never really figured out how to make him work right for me.
Nova: Everyone tells me I've built her wrong and yells at me when I play her so I stopped playing her.
-
16 hours ago, Shalath said:
DE disabled image upload a while ago as it was taking up a huge amount of space. Upload to Imgur or similar, right-click the image and select "copy image address" and use the "Insert other media at the bottom right of the forum editor. The URL must end in an image file extension for it to work, not the Imgur page address.
Well that's kind of bullS#&$.
At least I know now, so thanks for that.
-
16 hours ago, GnarlsDarkley said:
Fine. Buy her then. /thread
You are not open for suggestions and I don't feel like giving a wall any tips.
Go be stubborn child. I am out
What are you even talking about here. You're not making any sense at all.
-
16 hours ago, andy8610 said:
It's brand new content and lots of people want to farm them for various reasons. You'r just playing some martyr card now and it's not helping you or anyone else. If you want help be more constructive. If you don't start a team on your own or have 5 minutes of patience then it can't be helped.
Do you not know how to read? As I said above, I've tried multiple times one multiple days for multiple weeks. I've not found anyone farming them. I'm sorry if you're too good to ever have that problem or understand but you can't tell me I'm wrong, when I'm not. Your experience has obviously been different than mine. Good for you. I don't care, so you you can drop it before you start to come off as a complete idiot.
-
Quote
After almost 4 years and 2,3k hours spent I still don't have Despair, so I try to reason with rng. Garuda doesn't rely on it. If you want to farm her by yourself you can at least accomplish that in one week though.
Except it does as the parts come from bounties. Now they're fairly common drops from bounties but they're still RNG.
QuoteGo solo then. It isn't that hard. Take an Inaros with Atterax and you should have gotten both your Toroids after 30 minutes (repeat for each location)
Yeah, okay, sure, whatever you say.
QuoteDunno. I usually have hackings or caches in Spaceport, Enrichment Camp or the Temple
Not one bounty has ever taken me to the north of Fortuna. Ever.
QuoteThen show it to us and we can help improving it
Yeah. I don't feel like getting mocked by people this year, so that's not gonna happen.
-
1 minute ago, andy8610 said:
Sorry but I just don't buy this. There's a recruitment channel and I see teams going all the time, for general farm, specific toroids, meta-teams, chill teams, and so on. Either way, Garuda blueprints takes 2(!) toroids each. Thats not a grind, it just isn't.
Oh really? There's a recruitment channel? Oh gosh I guess I've never seen that. I just go to the recruitment channel and look for groups... oh, wait. I guess I do know about that and I've still never found groups farming toroids... huh... I guess I'm right then in what I've experienced and you're wrong since you're not me and don't know what you're talking about.
-
14 minutes ago, GnarlsDarkley said:
I guess you have to get a better Loadout then. I can farm them for infinity if I want to
Good for you I guess. I have the best loadout I can and I constantly get one shot by most of the enemies that start to appear around the level 4 alerts. Even the enemies around the level 3 alerts are probably going to kill me. I guess I guess you're just way better than me.
-
12 minutes ago, GnarlsDarkley said:
Wrong. Many Bounties take you to the all 3 spots. May it be hacking or caches.
No bounty I've ever run in Orb Vallis has ever taken me anywhere near the north where you get the Sola Toroid. Ever. They all are in the south part of the map with the occasional location in the east and rarely one just west of Fortuna.
-
16 minutes ago, andy8610 said:
Farming toroids is certainly not hard. There's teams going for it all the time and you don't even need experience to do it, you just kill stuff. Doing it solo works, but a team is highly recommended.
Either way, to further advice on the topic I will say that grinds where you benefit in other ways at the same time is better than some where you pretty much only hope for a certain part and don't get much else out of it. Content on plains/vallis is unlikely to be a waste of time for a completionist.
I have searched for over an hour to find people farming toroids and stopped because no one was farming them. This wasn't once or twice, this was multiple times over multiple weeks so I pretty much gave up on it because there are better things to do than try to find a team that doesn't exist.
-
3 minutes ago, andy8610 said:
In a relative sense those frames are not a hard grind, at all, and the few toroids you need for Garuda will probably drop just by doing content and exploring.
As suggested above, save your plat for Harrow or something like that. It's much worse to get teammates for older content.
One of my biggest complaints with Fortuna is that no matter what bounty you take or what level the bounty is, They all go to the same 5 to maybe 7 spots, and none of them take you to where you farm Sola Toroids (or whatever they're called). So you then have to go out of your way to get them and they're not easy (at least not for me) to farm.
-
20 minutes ago, GnarlsDarkley said:
Don't buy either!
Both are really easy to get imo. Sure Revenant depends on luck to get the parts (took me about 100 Bounties until I got them but mostly because 70 Bounties failed after Stage 2 without reason.
Garuda on the other hand is very very easy. I already unlocked her on my smurf without help.
Better buy Nidus or Harrow becuase these 2 really are f***ers when it comes down to farming them
Harrow was easy and has a really good quest to go with getting him. I haven't tried for NIdus... mostly because I'm not sure where you get it and it's not important enough to look up,
Of all of these Garuda was by far the hardest to get because of the syndicate rank requirement.
-
I've tried the things that I've seen posted on the forums and that I've found on Google but they don't work. They just post a link, not embed the actual screenshot.
RTX... will it arrive to Warframe?
in General Discussion
Posted
Wow. Look kid, never once did I imply that Fallout 4 was anything other than Fallout 4. I never said ti was a new game, an old game, or anything in between. Just that it was a game that the GTX1050 ti couldn't play at "max graphics" like the other person claimed. Also, I don't care about optimization of a game. That's not what I was pointing out. I was pointing out that the guy was wrong by saying that it could play "any game at max graphics".
Which is a totally different argument than what the other poster said. He didn't say that the GTX1050 ti could "play any game, you just might need to adjust the graphics to get the best performance". He said, and I'll quote it again because you can't seem to understand, that it could "play any game at max graphics". This is simply not true.
For starters, the RTX cards are way more powerful graphics cards. The RTX2060 has something like a 60% performance increase over the GTX1060 and the new RTX2060 will start around $350 msrp according to the recent CES announcement. So right there you're getting a good value for a card since it should be around the same price as the previous generation card. Second, while Raytracing is fairly new technology for games, it's not a "gimmick" like you claim. It's a new way to do lighting effects that will help games feel more real. Calling it a "gimmick" would be like calling the use of 3D textures over 2D textures a gimmick. Will every game need to implement Raytracing right now and as soon as possible? No. But if it becomes the standard, which I think it could be because it will make creating a game easier, older, online games like Warframe may want to consider it at some point.
What did I say that misrepresented anything? One post said, "the GTX1050 ti can play any game at max graphics", that was blatantly wrong and I pointed that out and provided an example. Never once did I say that the GTX1050 ti couldn't run a game if you lowered the graphics settings. I even said multiple times that the GTX1050 ti is a pretty good budget card.
I don't really need to try, ever post you put up where you try to change the subject or bring up something unrelated shows that you're not understanding what's being said.
Try to remember, the original claim was that you could "play any game at max graphics" on a GTX1050 ti. This is a false claim.