Jump to content

snarfbot

PC Member
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by snarfbot

  1. Mess can still get the highest ehp possible, followed by nidus. Surprisingly inaros with my normal build only gets about 25000 ehp. Which is more than enough I've found for almost any situation. I think in actual practice hell get the most use out of it though considering how easily he can heal himself. I didn't do the math on Trinity yet but shell likely do well with it as well.

    The thing is how powerful arcane guardian and health conversion is. Which pushes the balance towards frames with low base armor and shields respectively.

     

    Inaros has lots of free mod space though because he doesn't really need any stats other than range and even that isn't a necessity. Which makes it a no brainer. Incidently I tried him out with speed holster streamlined form and the new vigorous swap mod and he was able to rek the eidolon pretty fast with double arcane avenger. Not like chroma but pretty good and dead simple to pull off.

  2. Look I don't really care one way or another I just hate it when people use tactics like that in their arguments.

    It was a weak argument, based on an assumption of yours (that Warframe was designed for 3rd person. and 3rd and 1st person are mutually exclusive) without evidence to support it. So you added a line sucking up to the devs to shield your position from criticism.

     

    Now you're responding to my post that called you out with a bunch of other assumptions (it would take multiple years, break stuff I would get fired lol)

    This is not an argument, I'm not sure what it is. The only part that makes any sense in context to my post is the part where you argue that you weren't trying to appeal to DE, and it too was completely based on assumptions, in other words stuff you made up.

     

    Stop making things up, present a proper argument.

     

    If you think it will take dev resources away from something that you would personally prefer like new content then that is a valid concern but you can make that argument without acting like a tool.

     

    Edit: I think alot of this comes down to the way you present your opinion.

    I see the words "pro tip" or "news flash" all capitalization, I see someone trying to show emphasis. There are legitimate reasons I'm sure but usually they're used to prop up weak arguments. Your position can basically be boiled down to:

    I don't like it, I'd rather they use those resources elsewhere.

    Other people have different opinions and they are just as valid as yours.

  3. Oh get real, huginthecrow. How kind of you to compliment the devs. But that isn't actually evidence supporting your argument.

    In other words.

    "X is true because the devs are GREAT look at me I'm so nice" isn't a valid argument. It's like some wierd appeal to authority in a non sequitur.

  4. im playing her right now, its bad.

     

    the problem with ember has always been that she had no dump stat, she needs power strength, range, efficiency and duration, all her survivability comes from dead enemies and knockdown and arms flailing burning animation for cc.

     

    might as well go with accelerant and atterax build if im gonna have to be up in everyones face.

  5. i like the banshee changes, do you think people liked pressing 4 until everything died and then dropping a pizza in between waves? lol ofc not. and banshee has her 3 and 1 for some pretty solid cc, and an amazing 2. if anything you could compare sound quake with the revamped aug to a better version of embers 3, and silence to firequake.

     

    the reduced range ruins the skill, and the doubled damage does next to nothing to compensate in any situation that matters. in low level areas, its a straight nerf. in high levels, its a straight nerf lol.

×
×
  • Create New...