Jump to content

Tonksie

PC Member
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tonksie

  1. Prior to the creation of the individual apparel slot, the zephyr prime access commodore prime operator armor had a belt that went about the waist and connecting via chain to a hook on the back of the suit. Now, in the apparel slot, the belt is bugged - it is rotated about 15-20 degrees too far clockwise around the waist, causing it to clip and look completely wrong when compared to the previous, original form. Please could this be fixed.

  2. On prime warframes we have the wonderful option to toggle the prime components of the warframe when using tennogen skins to revert the prime skin with tennogen applied to just the default tennogen skin. Surely, it can't be that hard for DE to implement this for Excalibur Umbra? It is rather disappointing that there is no way to toggle the, in my opinion, slightly awkward looking C shaped pieces of gold on his armor - and the scarf, but more on that in a moment. Additionally, when we look at frames such as Nekros and Valkyr, Nekros has a separate attachment category for his binds, and Valkyr has the same additional attachment slot for her chordalla. Why can we not have Umbra's scarf, and potentially loincloth/tabard thingy work like that too? I love fashion frame, and I despise the way that some syandanas clip through warframes for example, like the aforementioned scarf of Umbra. Please allow us to toggle the Umbra details of Excalibur Umbra and potentially give us the option to remove/add his scarf/tabard//cloth components separately.

    Thank you for reading, and I hope we can get DE to consider this change soon.

    Some additional notes - I do understand that it may be difficult for DE to allow the scarf to be a separate attachment for a number of issues. But the toggling the Umbra components as a whole(the gold bits, the syandana and so forth) should not be a problem as it is effectively just reverting Umbra to a default Excalibur with the Umbra helmet, and then applying the skin, no?

  3. Prime access accessories are also referred to as exclusive but come back. Saying that the founders pack content’s claims if exclusivity are why they can’t be resold when prime access accessories can despite being marketed the exact same way is, well, senseless.

     

    - I do not want the founders stuff rereleased, but your logic is far from watertight

     

    EDIT: In reference to this:

    Founders packs were described as 'exclusive' in their marketing materials.  The act of selling that product, with that description, is what created the contract, and DE are legally obliged to uphold it.

  4. 4 minutes ago, rune_me said:

    The community doesn't care either way. Most of the community isn't even active on the forums and will never hear of this. They are busy playing the game.

    Until they try to talk in region chat and say something that's completely innocent, only for them to suffer an upwards of 3 day chat ban for talking. With no explanation, with no idea how long they are banned for...

    Yeah, they'll be busy playing the game after that...

  5. 1 minute ago, Gandergear said:

    Pointing out someones use of an ad hominem is now ad hominem. Player 1 attempted to disregard the argument given by attacking the way it was formatted rather than the content, Player 2 responded that Player 1 did this.

    That's not ad hominem.

    I think I'd call what player 2 did 'Satire'. It was meant to be a small bit of comedic relief in this otherwise depressing thread over the freedom to talk in-game as we wish.

  6. Just now, rune_me said:

    What else will you do? It's already been made clear there's nothing to be done about the filter.

    I'm not being bullied though. I have never been banned from chat. I have said whatever I wanted to say in region, and it has never had any consequences. If I felt bullied by the games staff, I would of course stop playing the game immediately. It would be kind of spineless to feel you are being bullied and keep crawling back every day asking for more.

    Then you should understand why me and the others in this thread are fighting for this reason.

  7. 3 minutes ago, rune_me said:

    But that would be a race the users are bound to loose, so that would be stupid. At the end of the day, the moderators can always just ban the user and be done with it. Or they can appeal to DE (who, let's face it, are more likely to listen to the moderators they themselves have appointed than to some random user) and get the account permanently suspended if push comes to shove. 

    That's like having an arms race against someone with a nuclear bomb when the best you can bring is handgun.

    So your suggestion is for us to just allow ourselves to be bullied into submission? That sounds so *very* appealing /sarcasm

  8. 1 minute ago, rune_me said:

    Forcefully is BS. If only DE can add words to the chat filter, then it obviously happened with their consent. Which means they either 1) don't think it's a harmless joke, or 2) don't want to see a bad joke flooding or spamming the chat.

    And as already said, what "most people" think is irrelevant in this situation, since "most people" don't host and run the chat. Only the rules of those who do matters.

    So basically, Warframe's chat being ruled in an authoritarian manner is perfectly okay with you. I guess I'll start bowing and kneeling for our chat moderator overlords who were given their places with absolutely no public consensus to get them there.

    Orrr...

    We could logically say, well, if it's an incredibly TINY minority of the playerbase that wants that phrase banned, but the vast Majority, keyword being Majority want it available to use, then surely we should go with the majority. Does DE want 2 players of 100 or do they want 98 players of 100?

  9. Just now, rune_me said:

    DE decided that. They have already stated so. It's there chat, so you have to play by their rules. And this is their rules. How offensive you or I think it is or isn't, is besides the point.

     

    Nope, one of the Chat Moderators was the one that decided it and had it forced into the filter. And then made a tumblr post about how they knew it was working and were judging their success based off how many people they managed to anger.

  10. Just now, Sunder said:

    One of our chat moderators actually

    Ya know...completely disregarding the people who happily refer to themselves as such. But one person was offended who has a position of power so they get more say than we do.

    That's why I have the issue. Especially as well, I myself would say that behind the screen in the real world, I am one such trap. So I guess my existance is transphobic. Ban me DE, I'm a transphobe by existing!!!

    I am fully aware of the whole moderators and their rather rash tumblr blog statements - I specifically came here after seeing the video uploaded by Rahetalius

  11. Just now, tucker_d_dawg said:

    No - actually I'm not.  Take some time out to re-read what I posted AND what I quoted.. In fact I'll highlight the relevant section for you:

     

    And if you think for one minute that people wouldn't find ways to abuse the system if linked items were automatically excluded you are simply naive.

    That is not what you stated. I agree with Pent, I do not agree with your attitude of 'if you got a ban deal with it, I do not care, learn from your mistakes[mistakes being to link items]'

  12. 1 minute ago, tucker_d_dawg said:

    Very much this. In fact there are so many phrases they could and should add to the auto-ban to clean up that cess pool that is region chat.

    Take your medicine and use your time away to grow up.  The only change I'd like to see is when one gets kicked - it informs them for how long.  Might reduce the number of posts on the forums (but probably not).

     

     

    You are completely ignoring the fact that players can be banned for just linking items. If you want to see for yourself, just try linking Nezha and the Kinetic Siphon Trap and watch what happens. Yes, people being obnoxious and offensive warrants a chat suspension. But linking items? The bot might as well throw a dart at a board with the region chat's population on it and pick people at random like that.

  13. Conclave is perfectly fine as is. If you’re struggling, tgen invest more time to learn it

     

    you can do private matches for playing other people like clan v clan.

     

    i don’t understand your issue with Oro however, it’s a fine system as is.

     

    As you haven’t actually specifically pointed out any other issues other than ‘weapons arent balanced’ which is only the case if you haven’t started to use conclave mods imo.

     

    in conclusion, I don’t see any reason for conclave to change and you are in fact probably playing the wrong game given what you are after.

  14. Completed my conclave weekly. The last game I played got me to max standing at my rank and I knew this and went to rank up with Teshin, making sure NOT to open the inbox message so that I would be able to claim my 50k standing once I ranked up. I then ranked up, opened my inbox message for it to show 10 orokin cells, 100k credits, Vermillion Storm Claws Stance, and 50k Standing. I am still at 0/70k though instead of 50k/70k, because I did not recieve that 50k standing. 

  15. 9 hours ago, o0Despair0o said:

    giphy.gif

     

    Are you telling me there's more of this Grindolon crap coming?

    That's it, I'm uninstalling. Not gonna accept this. If this turns out to be true, I'm out.

     

     

      Reveal hidden contents

    Unless it's more of a side-activity and NOT required for some kind of stupid faction like the Quills. But then it better be worth my time.

     

    Again disregarding the point of the post. If you want to whine about eidolons go elsewhere

×
×
  • Create New...