rune_me
-
Posts
3,273 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by rune_me
-
-
Nope, this is not a letter. It's a forum post. In the wrong sub section of the forum, even.
-
2 minutes ago, Syrtis said:
As yes the same hackneyed idea of, if you don't like it leave. How about instead we stay and try to make it better for everyone. It's one aspect of they game but a major one. They are trying to force people to use their crappy kdrives by nerfing the one good archwing. They may as well have made all AW the same boring generic thing.
We can not make the game better for everyone. Because everyone don't want the same thing. If I want Itzal nerfed and you don't, then how can we make the game better for both of us? That would be impossible. Since the Warframe community is not a hive mind, and since we clearly want very different things from the game, every decision made is bound to make someone happy, and someone else unhappy.
-
18 minutes ago, CoreXCZ said:
Article 13 is a pile of crap, honestly. It was made by a guy (how many people would just love to smack his face to oblivion) who doesn't know a thing about internet and what's worse, this addition to EU dictatorship literally gives dangerous power to companies if people didn't notice. DE might openly say they have that and that stance but fact remains, this also gives them power to fully silence anyone who would criticize them or their game heavily (and we all know of what crap is DE capable of sometimes), since Warframe is source of all content.
While I agree Article 13 is pretty messed up, it does in fact not give copyright holders any power they didn't already have. It's not a new law. It doesn't change or add anything to the already existing copyright laws. The laws regarding trademarks and copyrights remains the same as they have always been. It instead puts a series of demands on service providers to enforce those already existing laws.
DE, or any copyright owner, can't suddenly do something they couldn't already do before.
-
4 hours ago, (PS4)superthu said:
Yea, I dont see how its gonna affect many outside that country. EU isnt exactly able to dictate what Canadians or Americans or Russians or Japanese etc, can do. If anything, I see it as closing off EU content creator market , somewhat like how China has some weird Foreign Internrt is Illegal law... they filter out other countries internet or something.
Nah, it will affect all content creators that has a European audience. If you suddenly can't show your videos or streams in Europe, then you are going to loose a lot of revenue (provided you have a large European audience). It doesn't matter that you live in the US, YouTube, Twitch, etc, will still have to prevent any material that violates Article 13 from being streamed or shown within the EU.
-
2 hours ago, BloodKitten said:
atleast it was a proper review that havent just, played, 50 hours and called it a review, and havent put any spoilers like other reviers did.
No reviewer should have to play a game for more than 50 hours. If you can't give a proper review of a game in that time, then that's a fundamental design flaw in the game, and is not the fault of the reviewer.
I don't think that's the case with Warframe, though. I had a solid understanding of what the game was and what it was trying to be after 50 hours. 1000+ hours later, that initial impression hasn't changed.
-
6 hours ago, Sloan441 said:
My only real concern is how it's going to shake out on the various platforms. Again, hopefully it hits them all and we can pick it up where we see fit.
And pigs might fly.
Since Epic has been tweeting about the release there's some speculation it will be for the Epic Store. But so far it's just speculation, nothing has been announced.
-
13 hours ago, (XB1)XGN DrFeelGood said:
As long as it does it’s thing and sticks to it then it will keep going. The same can be said here. As long as we don’t side with the provoked crowd we will see the game grow instead of being nerfed into the ground.
Disney never just "did it's thing" and stuck to it. Disney constantly changed according to the market and their demographic. If they had just stuck to their own thing, they would still be making only animated movies. Instead they bought Pixar. They bought Lucasfilms. They bought Marvel. They bought Fox. Now they practically owns half the world (well at least half the entertainment landscape). Not sticking to their thing is exactly why they are so successful.
-
Maybe because you posted feedback in the non-feedback section of the forum.
-
6 hours ago, Blackout37 said:
I'm gonna rant here cause i'm salty, low level, and suck at the game.
I have been grinding for a few hours, just to get the saryn prime systems, or mesa prime neuroptics, and it seems i've gotten neither so I refine them to radiant (or if I don't have enough, which I don't most of the time, I simply go to the closest thing) and even after 7 hours of rinsing and repeating I get jack S#&$. YES, I'm salty, very salty. But if you make a system so difficult to get a single item, where multiple time and resources are wasted, and make some of your player base cry tears or frustration,(Wow, i'm such a mature person. I'm also great at spelling) something has obviously gone wrong.
Idk if anyone relates to me with this be feel free to bully me if you want, because by now I don't care.Go to recruit chat, find a radshare there. 4 people with the same radiant relic significantly increases your chances of getting what you're looking for. It'll speed up the farming a lot.
-
According to Steve SweetFX is allowed, and that is very similar to ReShade:
But if you worry it's better to reach out to the devs and ask first than take the risk, since none of us here can really promise you that it'll be okay.
-
1
-
-
Disney's doing alright for themselves, though.
-
Yeah first I need to know how fast the game shuts down on PC. Because some games these days, you have to quit to the main menu, or wait at a loading screen before the game shuts down. And that won't do with this game. When I rage quit, I don't want my game to take two minutes to actually shut down, I want it to quit RIGHT NOW, while I'm still angry.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, (PS4)Zero_029 said:
I know its RNG for when you spawn in but my luck with it has been horrible.
I seriously haven't been in a rainless Plains instance in over a month. Admittedly I've only go there for Nightwave challenges recently but since Orb Vallis launched the rare times I've gone into the plains it's always raining.
That moment when you try to jokingly ligthen up the mood by making a reference to what you thought was a popular movie from your childhood, but no one gets it and now you just feel old
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, (PS4)Zero_029 said:
Honestly its perpetually raining in the plains for me.
It can't rain all the time.
-
Just tested this on my iPhone and it goes to sleep mode just fine. Maybe you have turned on something in your notifications settings that I don't, that requires the phone to be active?
-
4 hours ago, Lucian_Adrion said:
This is hilarous. Now I can not take you seriously at all. As a min maxer I am besides myself in amusement. Some frames are not ment for everything. Accept that and you will be happy. I swear you are one of those weridos who bring Zephyr to the Orb fight and then get carried by my and my friends using a team of Chroma, Nezha, and Trinity. Not gonna bother and explain why that works not worth my time. You should know why it works. Seriously, I swear. Why do use high end players need to deal with players like you alk who do not know how to build or strategize or even bring a frame that actually makes sense for the content you are doing. No. You rather come to the forums and cry about. Put yourself together man. Adapt. Overcome. Learn. Achieve. It is simple.
Because you are playing a public match? The answer is as simple as that. If you play pugs, then you deal with what you get. If you end up with someone who doesn't bring the meta to the mission and you can't deal with that, well tough luck, that's on you for playing a public match. But no, instead of dealing with it you'd rather come to the forums and cry about it. Put yourself together man. Adapt. Overcome. Learn. Achieve. It is indeed simple.
-
7 hours ago, Carnage2K4 said:
Well, then basically, you've chosen to be willfully wrong, because given the definition in computer science, it is a beta, no matter if you consider it as such or not.
You should instead take issue with them monetizing a beta, not take issue with if it's actually a beta.No I have chosen to define beta as I was taught to by my professors. Sorry, but I'll take their word for it over yours. Pretty sure that I'm right. Should you happen to thijnk I'm wrong, I won't really loose sleep over that.
-
1 hour ago, Carnage2K4 said:
"they"... they are the computer programmers, they are the ones in the industry, "beta" is their term for their internal software... You/Gamers are only consumers, "beta/alpha" is not your term, you don't get to decide a new meaning for an established term within an industry. If THEY know it's beta because it fits the description of beta, then that's really the end of it.
Your opinion on the matter is irrelevant because you're not part of the vernacular and you're not part of the industry, which means you're not privy to the terms they use and you're essentially an outsider trying to create a meaning for terms that do not apply any where else but in your own head and the surrounding community of like minded people who like you, are ignorant of the terms context.
Hence, "they" can call it whatever they like.
I will however not accept the term beta as an excuse for anything in the case of Warframe, nor will I tell other people should the inquire into Warframe, that it is a game in beta. What I consider Warframe to be or not be be is of course only relevant to me and inside my own head and I never claimed otherwise. But on a similar note, what DE considers Warframe to be is not at all relevant to me.
Not once did I say they couldn't call it a beta. I said I will not consider it as such.
-
40 minutes ago, Carnage2K4 said:
It's funny how a players think their personal version of beta is the one that natters.
Ultimately, what gamers think Beta means is irrelevant, it means a feature complete, but unfinished game, technically WF is still alpha because they add features to it in fixes and patches and not individual Expansion/DLC packs.They can call it whatever they want, but if they are allowing me to pay via their microtransactions, then they don't get to use "it's just a beta" as an excuse for things not working. To be fair, DE has never used that excuse, but some players do seem to sweep aside any complaints with that very sentence. Imagine that in any other trade or profession. "Oh here's your new car you just bought and paid, yeah the breaks aren't really working yet, we're still testing them out, but have fun."
9 minutes ago, LSG501 said:Well that's just stupidity on the part of the people paying...
I know DE did 'similar' with founders packs etc but iirc the game was 'playable' all the time even then.
Founders packs are different. They are more like fundraising and crowd sourcing. When DE sold founders packs everyone knew the game was rough around the edges and lacked features, so it was more asking for help from people who saw future potential in the game. I have no problem with that.
-
Isn't that already interception? And excavation?
I can solo interceptions with my Rhino stomps for as long as I want to (provided there aren't any pesky nullfiers that mess things up for me) without ever killing a single enemy. And I can solo excavations with Limbo for as long as I want to.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, FlusteredFerret said:
Technically they are never finished, as development continues throughout the life of the game. However, once you start taking money from players, you should be able to provide a stable and playable product.
Exactly this. If you are asking money for a founders pack, or as crowd funding to get your game started, that's fine, you can do that with a beta. But the moment you start taking money from regular players and sell an actual product, then you don't get to pretend that your game is still in beta.
-
2 hours ago, SlyQuasar said:
We talk to each other over voice chat, because realistic endgame requires you to at least hear the leader, and discuss strategy on how you will tackle the mission.
Finding players who use voicechat is a fine and challenging endgame in and off itself.
-
8 minutes ago, CPTleivas said:
Not a small fraction of users is not a large fraction that is leaving unfortunately
Game developers don't just randomly decide to remove support for something like 32 bit. They do it when there aren't enough users still on 32 bit left to make it financially feasible to keep supporting it. Unlike you, DE has the numbers and the stats to know how many were still downloading and playing the 32 bit clients. If they decided to remove support, it's because it wasn't enough to justify the cost.
-
From the wiki:
Quote"Command, we've breached the ship. What is growing all over the walls and floors? Disgusting! It looks like it's... alive? [pause] No command, no sign of any personnel. Requesting orders. How do we proceed? Hold on a second... I think I heard something. [infested scream and several gunshots]"
If it's that one, it's an old one.
I'm satisfied with Warframe
in General
Posted
Yeah. Part of the reason the game is so good, is because people continuously post their "critique" in the general discussion sub-sections of the forum where the devs will never read them and where they are therefore completely ignored. This is indeed what makes the game great: that so much of the so-called critique never actually reaches the devs ears.