Jump to content

Glavenusaur

PC Member
  • Posts

    493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Glavenusaur

  1. 2 minutes ago, krc473 said:

    I mean, historically no one has ever really believed the Earth is flat. It is just something people believe now (no idea why). Do you have any valid explanations and proof as to the Earth being flat?

    None, but at the same time i myself do not have a "primary" source of evidence for the earth being round either, for all we know it could be a square and we are all within a simulation, how would we know that we aren't?

  2. 1 minute ago, krc473 said:

    How do you know you breathe underwater? How do you know you are not bulletproof? The list goes on and on. Sometimes it is best just to accept what you are told as fact. 

    I disagree, one factor for the progression of scientific research really is philosophical queries, why shouldn't that apply here with this specific subject also?

  3. 3 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    No. The Earth is not flat, it's not even worth the discussion. There is literally 0 evidence to support a flat evidence, and plenty that says otherwise.

    It may be, it may not be. Until we actually see it for ourselves we can't really say can we, for all we know it may be a cube or stranger still... a tesseract...

  4. 17 hours ago, (XB1)Scoobias said:

    FREESWORD Doesn’t Work anymore

    Thanks, updated the list accordingly, if you have any codes you've found youself please feel free to share ^_^

  5. 1 minute ago, (XB1)OTF SERENiTY said:

    I want the Scrambus hover boots for non-combative, passive use only. For real... We need Scrambus hover booties now for traveling now!!

    They honestly do look like a blast don't they, i would love to have the ability to use them too haha.

  6. 1 minute ago, rapt0rman said:

    Theoretically possible. No, obviously no one has any solid evidence. Yes, it would "fly in the face" of many religions, but science, knowledge, and progress certainly hasn't stopped religion before.

    It would certainly be a substantial blow though, with atheism in it's current form religion as a whole is on the back foot, and this could be the final nail in the coffin, religion would still exist but it wont be anywhere near as influential as it is now no?

  7. Just now, Lanadra said:

    Mounts are about as necessary in Warframe as they were in Guild Wars 2.. not necessary at all.

    Most of warframe contains "unnecessary" features within it, especially when it comes to customisation and such, should warframe not have implemented those either because they weren't "necessary"?

  8.  

    4 minutes ago, Miraluka said:

    You can use your archwing on the plains.

     

    3 minutes ago, EndermanBeast said:

    Archwing, and Dargyn. You heard of them yet?

     

    Ugh please... archwing is horrendous, i would rather jump around the whole map than use that nonsense, i'm talking about land mounts, something easy and seamless to use that is also quite nice to look at.

  9. I honestly think this would be a great idea, having customisable mounts you can use in the plains would certainly make it less boring that it is currently, heck DE could even allow us to mount or kavats and kubrows making them temporarily larger just for the plains of eidolon map, what do you guys think?

  10. Just now, -AoN-CanoLathra- said:

    I can't speak for everyone, but in my denomination's translation of the Bible, God says that he will tell "of this Heaven, and of this Earth", which I take to mean either Alternate Universes, Aliens, or both.

    but that is just the vague interpretation of one religion, as there may very well not be any sapient aliens, as i'm sure with our current level of technology, we would have find them by now no?

  11. Because if they do, doesn't that fly in the faces of all other religions? and for those that say they do, do you have proof? because we very well may be the first species ever to reach this point at-least when it comes to our own galaxy.

  12. 2 minutes ago, BornWithTeeth said:

    It just feels like a lazy and unfinished rework thrown out there to shut up the people complaining. I reckon DE should just bite the bullet, admit that World On Fire doesn’t fit with the game they want to see, and fully rework her kit.

    Hmm, i hear you, but that would be a big middle finger to all the people who spent hours kitting out ember simply for her WOF ability, i would believe it's better to keep the ability but perhaps have it scale in regards to enemy level so that it atleast finishes off enemies in with two successive procs with the right mods, but then again perhaps this is more of an balancing issue with the enemies in general, i honestly can't say.

  13. Hey guys,

    Now that ember has been nerfed, or shall we say some much needed balances have been put in place for her, do you guys enjoy her more for low level content, or do you think she was better the way she was previously, as we have had enough time with her new form to make an educated judgement, what do you guys think?

  14. 1 minute ago, DeMonkey said:

    You moan about harshness, but all you're doing here is insulting them?

    All they did was point out that they'd have banned you for openly admitting that you were trolling and stirring things up on the forums, and frankly I consider that fairly reasonable. Not sure this pettiness is justified.

    Perhaps, but i don't recall saying anything to warrant such a response either, from him that is, so excuse my saltiness if you can.

  15. 1 minute ago, DatDarkOne said:

    The oldest or one of the oldest "troublemakers" here would be me.  :tongue: LOL

    Fair... then the most active would be best haha, 16.000 posts though... i wonder if he remembers what it feels like to have your feet on the grass and sun over your head...

  16. 16 minutes ago, MagPrime said:

    Ha! Not only am I not qualified by DE standards due to my warning points, but I don't get along with the person who invites new mods.

    Plus, if I was, people like you would be banned the first time they publicly admitted to making troll topics. 

    I don't need to be a mod to say that we need more.

    Pretty harsh calling me out when you've accumulated warning points for reasons you don't seem to want to share along with not getting along with the person who invites new mods for again, reasons? but yes, we do need more mods, if only to ban you, the oldest trouble maker here...

  17. 18 hours ago, MagPrime said:

    ...that click bait titles are incredibly annoying and were against forum guidelines.

    ... that this is more an Off Topic post due to there being nothing to discuss

    ...we need more community moderators

    Then why don't you become one dude, you've probably got more experience than all the mods combined, heck you probably live on the forums, about time to give back to the community you've entertained yourself with for several years no? 

  18. What if your all just a figment of my imagination, that everything that has come to be is simply because i thought it up subconsciously on the spot? but then what if we're all in a simulation, would there be any way to prove otherwise?

  19. 2 minutes ago, -QUILL_PETER- said:

    This might be the saddest post I've ever seen.

    This is the off-topic forum section of an extremely nerdy free to play space shooter... It's a pretty sad place to begin with.

  20. Lets play a little warframe together, I primarily play on PC so would love to have a bit of banter with the opposite gender, lets shoot up some aliens in space. :thumbup:

×
×
  • Create New...