Jump to content

IamLoco

PC Member
  • Content Count

    283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

541

About IamLoco

  • Rank
    Disciple

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I somehow expected a COVID19 skin for Saryn, instead the TennoCon got canceled. GOOD decision, just a sad one. I´ll tune in for the broadcast, for sure. But I´ll miss the atmosphere and all the cheering.
  2. Meh! *imagine red face emoji*
  3. A big MEH! from my side concerning AoE weapons. In your efforts to somehow rebalance self-damage, you completely went the wrong way. Again, I remind you that huge parts of the player base suggested lowering the self-damage to a reasonable amount. Don´t remove it, balance it. What you now did to AoE weapons though makes them completely (!) irrelevant on higher levels. They will still be good to show off against newbies in lvl 15 defense missions (look at my big badda boom, noobs!) but with a 90% dmg reduction, what´s the purpose of using them in sorties or even arbitrations?? Why would any sane person use a kuva ogris or bramma (clunky, slow) if it only kills with a direct hit while you could easily achieve the same result with a much easier to handle sniper rifle or even a pesky burst rifle? The only reason to ever use a clunky explosive weapon was to blow up a whole room or to launch enemies behind cover into space. You really dropped the ball here, my dudes
  4. Oh well... let´s all have a little fun with Acceltra, Bramma, Ogris and co before we can dump them in the trash. Bye bye, Aoe weapons. It was fun while it lasted. Time to look at that Destiny2 then!
  5. A big MEH! from my side concerning AoE weapons. In your efforts to somehow rebalance self-damage, you completely went the wrong way. Again, I remind you that huge parts of the player base suggested lowering the self-damage to a reasonable amount. Don´t remove it, balance it. What you now did to AoE weapons though makes them completely (!) irrelevant on higher levels. They will still be good to show off against newbies in lvl 15 defense missions (look at my big badda boom, noobs!) but with a 90% dmg reduction, what´s the purpose of using them in sorties or even arbitrations?? Why would any sane person use a kuva ogris or bramma (clunky, slow) if it only kills with a direct hit while you could easily achieve the same result with a much easier to handle sniper rifle or even a pesky burst rifle? The only reason to ever use a clunky explosive weapon was to blow up a whole room or to launch enemies behind cover into space. You really dropped the ball here, my dudes.
  6. Please do NOT completely remove self damage. Why? Weapons like the Kuva Bramma, Ogris etc. would only be abused for an explosive slaughter festival until you re-introduce self-damage. Those weapons NEED to have a risk of using or people will either abuse them or you will eventually nerf them. Just REDUCE the self damage dealt by those weapons to a degree that is still dangerous, but not lethal. If you hit yourself once, you live - maybe with 50% of your health left. If you hit yourself a 2nd time, you get increasingly more damage, ending with 25%.... and so on. Just having a short stagger effect would only encourage to fire at anything within range, the effect is ridiculous. OR make that stagger effect significantly LONGER, so people would still take care!
  7. Some good changes, DE. BUT - removing self dmg completely goes too far. All we (?) asked for was to rebalance the amount of dmg we get. Let us survive a direct blow with 10,25,50% hp, or sth like that... - Arcanes are fine like they are. You said you don´t want to increase the grind, but that´s exactly what you do. Adding cooldowns is a horrible idea.
  8. I know you won´t answer my question. But... What are you going to do about those pesky "Host migration" problems?
  9. Just stop being stubborn and accept that you simply made a big mistake. No one that I´ve heard of had problems understanding this simple text. At this point I am almost convinced you are trolling here.
  10. You WILL keep the formas, catalyst etc. and your weapon will remain lvl 40, IF you chose the correct order. If you fuse the leveled up weapon INTO a new, unleveld weapon, you will lose that progress as the new weapon will be the one that remains and the upgraded version gets eaten. The transfer screen even tells you this. If you instead use the new weapon to fuse it into your upgraded weapon, it will receive the buffed elemental damage and the new element but you will keep your progress. The order matters. The weapon you start with should always be your upgraded, formaed weapon.
  11. You quoted the correct thing but failed to understand its meaning. The order matters. You will keep the weapon that you START with. This should have been your fully upgraded, leveld, formaed bow. You should have then fused the 52% heat bramma into your 28% rad bramma. The transfer screen very clearly describes what will happen to the weapon. If you had used the correct order, you would have ended up with a lvl 40, 5 forma, 57% fire bramma. I see no bug here and no fault on DE´s side. I´ve done half a dozen of transfers already and this is exactly how it´s supposed to work.
  12. This might have been a sound bug.... after restarting the game, the sound seemed to be back to normal. Strange! Maybe move this to bugs instead? Or am I going loco....?
  13. Even mentioning "This weapon does DEFINITELY NOT deserve a nerf" will wake the BEAR. 😉
  14. 1. Stop calling for nerfs! Gosh.... 2. Many people will use the Bramma at the beginning, and dump it later because of the high risk of killing yourself. It´s fun, because it´s new. And it´s hilarious, and freaking dangerous.
  15. After the latest Hotfix, the Bramma doesn´t "BOOOOM!" any more, it rather "bip!"s. Why? I mean.... WHY? It was the coolest part, the mighty BOOM!
×
×
  • Create New...