Jump to content
The Lotus Eaters: Share Bug Reports and Feedback Here! ×

Last post wins


Mr.ElevenXI
 Share

Recommended Posts

You didn't really think that would work, did you? Silly Ghost.

My brakk deals enough damage to break down the Jackal while his shields are still up. Zanuka and Stalker cannot withstand a full volley from the thing.

It is capable of sending RNGesus toppling off his throne. It can cause Fomorians to explode without even needing to use the Corruptors.

So yeah, guess I did think it would work. Back to the drawing board I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Break the body, and the spirit lives on!
Unless you cast soul trap or something. That would suck.

*Fires Phasic Shift Generator and sends my fortress (and all my allies) into an alternate dimension*
Just as well I invested in the radiation shielding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have fled? This is unexpected, but it does remove you as a threat to my Silentium. So I suppose I cannot entirely object.

I have not fled, merely made a tactical retreat. I may return, with either diplomacy or war. However, I do know when a war is ending up hopeless, so I take the route that ends with the least amount of allied casualties.

If only that worked in Strategy games, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not fled, merely made a tactical retreat. I may return, with either diplomacy or war. However, I do know when a war is ending up hopeless, so I take the route that ends with the least amount of allied casualties.

If only that worked in Strategy games, though.

Ah, yes, ba'slan shev'la. A wise tactic, from a worthy adversary. I would expect nothing less.

 

I would advise a more diplomatic approach, on your return. My offer of a fief to rule under me still stands. I do, however, demand that every ruler that owes me fealty take a name as needlessly melodramatic as my own appellation of Silent King.

 

Perhaps you could be the Insurgent King?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, yes, ba'slan shev'la. A wise tactic, from a worthy adversary. I would expect nothing less.

 

I would advise a more diplomatic approach, on your return. My offer of a fief to rule under me still stands. I do, however, demand that every ruler that owes me fealty take a name as needlessly melodramatic as my own appellation of Silent King.

 

Perhaps you could be the Insurgent King?

I prefer 'The Traitor General.' Kings have too much power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, but that depends entirely. That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet. "King" is but a title, a label given to those in power. Some kings are just figureheads with no power. Some are puppets, the real power lying in the hands of a senior adviser or general. Some aren't even called kings to begin with.

 

"Traitor" is not a very melodramatic word, either. It cannot begin to compare to "insurgent."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

"Traitor" is not a very melodramatic word, either. It cannot begin to compare to "insurgent."

True, but which sounds better, or more noble? Traitor, or Insurgent? A Traitor is one who has thrown away his loyalty and sided with those his former allies see as enemies, while an Insurgent rebels against a regime. A Traitor is a criminal, while an Insurgent is one mans freedom fighter and another mans terrorist. I am not one for noble titles or referendums. Melodramatic? No. Effective? Possibly. General? Perhaps. Manic? Oh boy, where do I start...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...