Jump to content

8faiNt

PC Member
  • Posts

    947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 8faiNt

  1. 15 minutes ago, Calhoun. said:

    Yes, I'm pretty sure it is captured

    But i'm not running solo. 😞

    There's a bug... if someone else other than the Host kills the eidolons it will count as a kill instead of a capture. so, even though you had the lures charged that might ve been the case resulting with a kill on the stats

     

    I should also add that I didnt test it nor confirmed what I just said. I ve had this information from a player in-game, while hunting. I dont see a reason why it would be false or a lie though.

  2. 3 hours ago, Nikikin said:

    why not remove mods from your warframe, instead of ruin it for everyone who want to enjoy some relaxing grind after work?

    If you want to enjoy a relaxing grind after work you can farm the fossa boss 😉

     

  3. 1 hour ago, OvisCaedo said:

    Well, let's see. 16.67 fire rate at 16 damage per shot is 266.72 DPS. 15 fire rate at 18 damage per shot would be... 270 DPS. Wowzers, look at that, it's very slightly more and accomplishes the stated goal of slightly better ammo efficiency.

    They were just rough example numbers for the suggestion to begin with, so it shouldn't have really mattered if this worked out or not, but if you wanted to get so angry over the specifics maybe you should have checked it instead of insulting other people for not doing so.

    I guess it would mean slightly less corrosive proc stacking, and slightly fewer slash procs but with slightly higher damage. The other flipside being that improved ammo efficiency, with the same magazine size, will also slightly improve long-term damage since it means the firing uptime vs reload time is better.

    Perhaps, I should ve calculated the DPS instead of guessing. I take the guilt. thanks for fixing my misunderstanding. but then again -fire rate is -fire rate. Its not just the raw damage it affects after all

    And considering Baza is used with Hunter Mun. Mod for minmax damage I still dont think sacrificing fire rate is a good thing to do. though It would need to be calculated and as you can see I didnt even bother to calculate the raw dps untill you mentioned it to me

    so it might turn into a ttk problem rather than a dps problem considering slash procc is everything for baza

  4. 25 minutes ago, SneakyErvin said:

    Liches were bad, that seems to be the general opinion. Empyrean is a matter of taste and far from a failure. It is solid content, if you dont like it that is up to you.

    Open world archwings work the same now as they did before except for the blink change, which was done with open world in mind. They are actually better in open world now because you keep the intrinsic bonuses from RJ. Amesha can use a change mostly because Archwngs havent been touched in years, just as all archwings can use a change. No need to keep the outlier that trivializes the whole RJ content when they want it to be a more balanced piece of content overall. So bring up the rest of the archiwngs and tone down amesha. You know something is overtuned when only the impact of latency or a "bad" host can kill you.

    You are also mixing up the order regarding how the whole loot thing happened. They nerfed the loot frames, heard the uproar and changed it back at the same time as they introduced the mod drop booster, a booster I doubt anyone is using.

    doesnt matter what is the order. they replaced credit booster with mod booster on sortie rewards which is bad itself already.

     

    ''Liches were bad, that seems to be the general opinion. Empyrean is a matter of taste and far from a failure. It is solid content, if you dont like it that is up to you.''

    so liches are bad and thats a fact because? and empyrean isnt bad because its an opinion?

    sounds like you didnt like the liches and you liked the empyrean. and you are saying as if thats a fact. If you havent realized that, here you go again; my opinion is completly a opinion. there's even a hint: No volt deluxe.

    Just because you liked something it doesnt mean its a fact.

    Also, both liches and railjack have the same grind over grind system at the moment which is why they are mentioned together.

    Obvious bias of yours is obvious.

    • Like 2
  5. 12 minutes ago, BansheePrime said:

    “Obvious player loss” unless you’re looking back more than a day.

    Liches and Railjack both of them were a failure. They introduced us the grind over grind system.

    Blink was nerfed. and space archwing and the weapons are being completly adapted to railjack and they dont care about the open world archwing by the looks of it. and now they are completly changing the archwings because amesha was too good? lol.

    They added Mod Drop Chance Booster and removed the combination between farming frames and then added them back because of the huge backlash.

    Volt didnt get a deluxe.

     

    these are the things I can think of at the moment. Considering they wasted like years making liches and the railjack they were both a failure and didnt contribute to the playerbase.

    There was nothing revolutionary about warframe this year. It was the year of disappointment. 

     

    anyway... you can pretend like things aren't there when they are, obviously.

     

  6. 16 hours ago, Fiddlestixxx said:

    His point was to swap some fire rate for base damage to make it more ammo efficient. Maybe he did the math on that already to make sure it was an even swap to DPS, maybe he just threw those numbers out there as an example. I don't know, I didn't check. Don't act like a condescending snob.

    Increasing base damage by 2-3 and decrasing the fire rate? I dont even need to do the math to say that it will have less DPS next time dont talk about stuff you didnt check. so, I wont be in the position to be a '' condescending snob '' 

    what a joker you are.

  7. 3 minutes ago, Drachnyn said:

    Oh I understood what you were going for but the comparison fails because there is no innate urgency here unlike in a real war. I never denied that energize is strong but I dont think it's worth the price. Ultimately you should buy something that you are going to enjoy of course. For a considerable amount of people (so much that it's a good assumption) looking good is enjoyable so it's a perfectly valid purchase.

    Why do I respond? Because I feel like it.

    here?  You do know that Im talking about the game right? and you do know that the game is a very fast paced game, right? aka things are fast/''urgent'' unbelievable things you say just because you didnt understand the metaphor and called it bad instead.

    Warframe is literally a warzone. Welcome to warframe. Are you new here? oh let me explain what its all about ahmm so there are warframes and we play them and we do genocides, got that much?

    anyway I made my point Im not gonna stay here and continue. you can feel both ways if you want, I wouldnt care

     

    p.s You do know that Arcanes are farmable right? If someone cant afford it they can start grinding. which just happens.. that's very warframe of the game that we grind stuff we require instead of buying. also, just because you think the price is too much it doesnt mean its overrated. Things are pricey because of supply and demand. and just like everything Energize prices arent stable and they go up or down depending on supply

  8. 4 minutes ago, Drachnyn said:

    If you are at the point of considering buying a full energize set i would assume you'd have every thing else already. Also your comparison is hilariously bad.

    Why do you assume that you need everything else before buying a r3 arcane someone might be just passionate about it

    Its not hilariously bad you just dont understand the metaphor.

    Buying food will give you a better chance at surviving, obviously. and buying energize will give you more energy, obviously.. therefore you will be able to kill more enemies and increase your survival chance. but then again I think considering your advice on this topic it might be normal that you dont get it

    also why are you still replying? ah crap I just gave you a reason to reply didnt i?

  9. 2 minutes ago, Drachnyn said:

    Only if you dont care about how you look.

    I dont think OP is here for fashion advice nor I am talking about fashion. prioritizing things that has no use to you over things that will help you in missions is a bad thing but giving that as an advice is worse

    anyway Its your plat you do your stuff I dont really care what you spend your money on I just replied so OP wont be confused over your bad investment idea

     

    Imagine being in a war country and instead of buying/finding food with what you got you get a piece of sculpture to look at.

×
×
  • Create New...