Jump to content

RagingGrizzly

PC Member
  • Posts

    3,934
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RagingGrizzly

  1. 1 minute ago, RealHeftyTrout said:

    Been searching up a bit on Anthem.and yeah it being produced by EA is not the most welcoming sign, but is confirmed that there will be no loot boxes and all microtransactions are for cosmetic purposes which does shine a ray of light on it. Never saw much about DLC so I can't really say how that'll go.

    One of the main issues there is that there's micro transactions in a premium game that we'll already have to shill out 60-120 dollars for. Even if they're just cosmetic, (Why are they even in a premium game to begin with?) the avenue is there for EA or Bioware to change it in the future. I don't hold my trust those companies and I fully expect nothing good to come out of it in the long run. I'd like to be wrong, but you know how EA is.

  2. I think if DE decided to have some sort of aging factor (Not completely sure if they can even age in the first place) as more quests are added to the game, I don't think that they'll replace anything, just more of an add-on to themselves. 

    Operators need more love, but not enough for them to replace the frames in flash and fun.

  3. 27 minutes ago, daveythedumb said:

    All you need to do is read over how everyone responded to figure this one out

    Backpedaling under the guise of a social experiment won't do anything for you when you're in the minority in this instance right out of the gate.

  4. 38 minutes ago, daveythedumb said:

    Because even you guys define tanks differently from each other

    52OHJ3D.jpg

    Most of us here are defining Tanks to have the abilities to draw aggro (And even then, we don't have a true aggro system tied to abilities in the game) and be durable, you're the one going through mental gymnastics to conflate Limbo with them.

  5. 7 minutes ago, daveythedumb said:

    Why is it wrong?

    Enemies focused on attacking the point,

    you take limbo bring a aoe damage weapon, shoot them, hop into the rift, and tank their shots

    I don't see it sorry

    How can we change your mind if you're not willing to listen.

    Limbo has no aggro mechanics. Limbo can't take damage. Using this niche scenario that anyone can do to say he's a tank is just incorrect. Limbo is a caster as far as I'm concerned. And trying to waste time people's time by talking about it when we all know what he is is just unfathomable.

  6. 1 minute ago, daveythedumb said:

    As a "tank" you can't "out tank" a group of enemies trying to attack an "objective"

    I was simply answering that point, on a side

    That wasn't really a point. He was just using the objective as another reason that using presence for aggro to say that Limbo can be a tank is wrong.

  7. 6 minutes ago, daveythedumb said:

    On the other side of the coin, if limbo is the one being attacked then the friendlies walking up won't do anything.

    If an objective is under fire...

    cataclysm+stasis. lul

    That's not really tanking though. (Beginning to question the point of the thread) Rhino could also 1up Limbo's CC with his Stomp being one of the best CC abilities in the game, and Rhino is still defined as a tank while Limbo is just a literally a piece of stylish construction paper.

  8. 3 minutes ago, daveythedumb said:

    Tanking is drawing aggro, yes

    So walk into a group of enemies, hit rift and watch your team slaughter them gg

    You're only looking at one side of the coin. Others will draw aggro with their presence as they approach anyway, limbo can't keep aggro and doesn't have abilities to do so.

×
×
  • Create New...