Jump to content

DrakeRemorea

PC Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    271

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by DrakeRemorea

    When will PRIME ACCESS BUYERS be heard?

    in General

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Ksaero said:

    Just realized you're playing on NSW. PA Accessory packs already include platinum there right? In that case, yeah, it'd seem like something is missing. I'm playing on PC though, and Accessory packs here include only boosters, without any platinum

    Oh lol I didn't know guess we were both right haha idk why they have different packages then 

    1 hour ago, Ksaero said:

    So what's a better choice: to buy PA Accessory pack including accessories and two boosters which costs 23 USD, or PV Accessory pack including accessories and 200 platinum which costs 9 USD?

    Also on the switch it's like 2400 platinum 90d boosters, prime sets and costs around $65 USD. Somewhere around $55 us i think

    Re release original Warframe!

    in General

    Posted

    1 hour ago, NocheLuz said:

    Okay... That is your understanding of that sentence... but oh well... maybe my english aren't good enough for you. Since for you I'm retarded and you're so much more genius that you don't even try to understand me. And by 'Anymore' meaning that you understand me earlier? I sure don't saw it that why from your first reply to me.

    Okay you have to be milkin it now lol

     

    1 hour ago, NocheLuz said:

    Not the perspective. But well... I'm sure english is difference in England and America. But I should really use 'Feature' for more specific meaning. Also, I can't see you started the thread (atleast the first poster isn't you and I'm not even reply to you in the first place, until you quote me). Furthermore, I'm assuming because you said I'm complaining, it would mean you think I don't like/satisfy the game, yes? Or you think I'm complaining because I like the game? Then you should be using feedback not complaning.

    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/complaining

    Also, I'm not complaning in the first place. I think you 'DO' understand me now. Or If you still think I'm complaning, please tell me which one I'm complaning about and we can start from there.

    Huh? That's not how it works you went far out of the box in taking my words unto perspective lol wtf is this

    Can we have the audio of the Gauss video re-recorded.

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    I'm sorry but you are being absurd here. While it is technicaly correct that WF Gauss being named after Mathmatician Gauss cannot be deffinitvly proved it is still absurd to claim uncertinty

    No it's factual. Well you may see it as absurd I'm right lol.

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    The abundance of evidence pointing to this is overwhelming.

    But see it's not evidence. Think you dont know what evidence is. Because comparisons doesnt equal evidence. 

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    Even if Gauss designer was to say they created the name independent of knowledge of it's previous uses it would still be reasonable (though slightly less so) to belive otherwise

    Nope. If Gauss wasn't a person and his name never existed, DE no one would complain about the sounding. Because words are interpretable and usually pronunciation is defined by popularity. However in this case the original users of the word make for the pronunciation. DE. Now this exists whether it's someone's name or not. Because it's a name. Not a dictionary word. A name. Figure that out.

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    Absolute logic doesn't go far in the real world, we haven to work of degrees of certanity

    Really? You're wrong there because if someone is accused of murder you have to have logic and evidence. Not comparisons, coincidence, opinions. This applies for many things you'll one day learn. Hopefully.

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    DE could issue a statment of the origin of Gauss name but how can we logically prove this statment is true or valid?

    Because the original creator of the intellectual property has made a statement on behave of that intellectual property therefore altering their properties of it, they can do it whenever, however no need for truth or validation...

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    You can reply to this post, but how can you be sure this was typed coherently and not the result of me mashing the keyboard

    I can't be honestly but statistically speaking no one has ever made a sentence with button mashing... and this situation here about pronunciation is excluded from statistical expectations as it's an intellectual property of DE's that no one but them can outright choose pronunciation of.

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    You are pushing towards the point where you must question your own perception of realiy

    Is this of reality or a pronunciation of intellectual property defined by its owners?

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    Yes, technically I cannot prove that anything but myself (in some form) excists.

    Really you can't prove a rock exists? Or a mouse? Or me behind a screen typing this? Those aren't assumptions those are provable facts. This isn't. 

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    However it appears to and I can hold enougth certainity in it to make it worth engaging with.

    You havent yet.

    3 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    Yes I can't know for certain the origin of Gauss name

    That honestly doesn't even matter, it's up to the owners of an intellectual property to name it, and to decide it's pronunciation. If someone named their kid Gauss after the scientists and changed the pronunciation are they wrong to do so? No because it's their naming of their kid, same with spelling. 

    4 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    but I can be confident enougth in the common consensus.

    Consensus LOL. Search that meaning up LOL. What you're looking for is majority! LOL. also still wrong because you haven't contacted enough of a percent of users with a survey properly prove that.

    4 hours ago, (PS4)Shelneroth said:

    To question that confidence (without good reason) is to shutdown conversation of the topic

    Didn't question it I laughed at it. All you're reasoning is false, improper, un provable, just stupid, and also hypocritical. 

    3 hours ago, HugintheCrow said:

    Made me think.

    @(NSW)Drake_Remorea, you said earlier you're not trolling, nor you have brain damage. However, you presented no actual evidence to that. You can't prove you're not trolling. You can't prove you don't have brain damage. Since your words are exactly what a person that is either trolling or has brain damage would say.

    I guess you're right, I haven't proof for non brain damage. So I'll tell you I believe I dont have brain damage. However trolling, is a mindset. And although I could be lying, me saying I am not proves to the least I'm not. Because it's barely an action thats definable.

    3 hours ago, HugintheCrow said:

    Hence, I rest my case by clearly proving you are trolling or suffer from a stroke/brain tumor, to which I say:

    You haven't proven anything? Except that it's possible i have brain damage. Also it appears to me you're trolling, and brain damage isn't necessarily a life threatening condition.

    Also using your logic I can call you, mentally retarded, you have no brain cells, you have no fore arms, you havent ever even played warframe. Since you cannot prove otherwise I'm right about everything...

    Re release original Warframe!

    in General

    Posted

    3 hours ago, NocheLuz said:
    6 hours ago, (NSW)Drake_Remorea said:

    Okay I can't understand you anymore...

    O...kay... then... I thought you misunderstood me all along but turn out you never understand me. You called me complaining without even knowing what I am complaining about and even I said I didn't complain you still insist on that I complaning on something

    My god you're retarded... "anymore" 

    And "i thought you misunderstood me all along but turn out you never understand me" means the same thing and you used it as one sentence wtf?

    3 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    Sorry if my bad english misleading you. Just understand that I didn't complaning in the first place would be enough. Since I just try to layout some asoect you can expected in Warframe 2013 didn't mean I don't like/accpeted Warframe 2013 or Warframe right now. So it's not your fault that you didn't understand me (and I never said it your fault). I just hoping you do understand me now. Or if you still insisted. I may ask you what make you think I complaning or what make you think I don't like Warframe. I can start explaing from there

    Never said you dont like warframe wtf? Also I didn't need aspect, guessing you meant perspective.  Still didn't need that, I started this thread...

    When will PRIME ACCESS BUYERS be heard?

    in General

    Posted

    12 hours ago, Ksaero said:

    Why can't we have the same stuff with PA Accessory packs? I'm ok with their price, I just want the thing added there be something I can actually use. Seriously, I get exp/credit boosters as daily rewards so often that they won't expire in a very, very long time (and I have no use for them since I already have all my gear and focus schools maxed). Replacing boosters with platinum of equal value would definitely make PAA packs more desirable and essentially generate more profit. I, personally, would have an incentive to buy every PAA pack instead of skipping half of them just to buy later at a greatly reduced price

    It wont change the price is my point. However you also dont understand that buying a 30d booster in the market for 200p, doesn't mean that they're worth 200p directly in Prime Access. Chances are it'd increase from 2400 platinum to maybe 2800 or 3000 at most with 30d boosters still... they cant just get rid of the boosters they add value. But that amount of platinum doesn't increase the value based in overall purchase because new buyers, target market, wont know the difference. But they'll notice no boosters.

    If you dont understand marketing or sales. You aren't going to understand why this will never work. You are all looking at the "what I want" perspective...

    • Like 1

    Re release original Warframe!

    in General

    Posted

    11 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    It is a facts. Or can you tell me which one isn't true? You may read as opinion but I may ask you if it true and count as facts? If you read it and implying that he isn't OP right now that is your opinion, not mine (although I do accept that he still OP lol). But I think you do get it now.

    Lol that sentence is retarded. So unable to understand lol. Also it's opinions so... yeah... saying something is good or bad is an opinion.

    11 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    Oh right... You just don't like how people complaining and that don't count as can't accepted isn't it... Although I don't really complaning about the game.

    Bruh what?

    11 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    What am I complaining about? About the facts that I just layout the changed in Warframe?... yeah... right... talking about how something has changed do count as complaining now isn't it? Also, most of the point in the Original reply don't even have my opinion in it (I didn't say All but Most of it... in case you really want to make this a counter-argument). If I have to lay out I would like you to read carefully. Very OP and OP have a play of words. Although it have positive meaning it doesn't mean it have equal value

    Okay I can't understand you anymore... 

    11 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    I really don't. I only reply to you because you somehow 'Misunderstood' me. Not that I care how you view the game but how you view my reply.

    I didn't misunderstand you, however what you're saying is ignorant, opinions, insanely misleading so yeah kinda starting to not understand you, not my fault though. It's your bad English in text.

    Can we have the audio of the Gauss video re-recorded.

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    18 hours ago, SneakyErvin said:

    Actually they arent just assumptions, well maybe Gauss' theme, though logic and deductive thinking says his theme is based on Gauss.

    But thats not proof lol. That's literally an assumption, taking comparisons and filling in the rest as if it's facts.

    18 hours ago, SneakyErvin said:

    But his name doesnt change how it is spelled or worded, wether if it is made up by DE or if he uses the name of the scientist. Language rules are rules, they simply are one way. Dialects may alter them slightly, but the rules are still there.

    So I doubt you understand them since you defend the pronunciation just as bad as the people who complain about it. 

    You are both wrong and very silly.

    Actually thats wrong, because everything in the language's rules have rules, stipulations, everything varies and English can be very independent between words and sentences and etc. Very vast in comparison to other languages. Anyway what rules define how its pronounced? Because as it stands it's pronounced with each word individual making it G-aw/uh-ss. 

    And no I don't defend it poorly, you're peoples illogical assuming mindset makes you believe fill in the blank has to be right without evidence. Whether or not that works to be right most or sometimes. It's still illogical, and simple assumptions.

    Also I haven't been proven wrong at all??? Sooooo. Maybe it's because I'm not? Guess what I'm not, nothing has been said to affirm direct connection of Dr. Gauss and the Gauss from warframe. From of course the origin, DE. Anyone else can't just assume themselves right.

    Re release original Warframe!

    in General

    Posted

    3 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    If you read 'Carefully' You will notice that I never said 'At that time' Which mean 'only that time'. Just read 'carefully'. Don't worries about anything else just read what you just quote me over again. Right? Now tell me. Did anything I said mean The Rhino 'right now' isn't OP? Your statement make me feel like I said Rhino OP at that time only.

    No but by saying in your original comment that the problem with it is something that is still a problem either proves you lack of a point, or just means you were originally implying that now he isn't, since it was a problem. Dude you're words are real smart lol.

    3 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    Lastly, I just said something and you don't like it. Isn't that mean you can't accept it?

    No it really doesn't LOL

    3 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    And what I said is facts about how Warframe has changed and you just said something like I'm complaining

    Really because you said Rhino was a very OP frame. And then said he still is. Does that sound like change? Also you're complaining...

    3 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    I really can't see you accepting what I said (which is facts) there..

    They aren't facts? I accept you saying them, byt they're opinions.

    3 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    However, like I said. Don't mind me if you like the Old Warframe. I don't really care either way

    You sound like you care. Yet if I were you I'd try too play it of like that too when so repeatedly wrong lol.

    Can we have the audio of the Gauss video re-recorded.

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    4 hours ago, SneakyErvin said:

    You just seem stubborn out of shear joy to argue.

    You need to be dead blind in order to not see that Gauss is based on Gauss and his theories. It even goes so far that he connects with Mag. And even if it wasnt based on Gauss, the name DE gave him would still be the exact same name i.e Gauss, because it is spelled exactly the same so follows the exact same rules. Now DEs way of pronouncing it isnt wrong, it is the english dialect version, but the german way is also correct.

    Both sides here are pretty silly imo because neither understands the vast differences when it comes to names and how differently nations pronounce them.

    I understand them thank you, they're just assumptions and cannot be proven or determined without DE. 

    Re release original Warframe!

    in General

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Bioness said:

    The difference is World of Warcraft was a full game in Classic and the game itself is separated in expansion, each with a different overall player feeling. The main call for Classic WoW is also because of how the classic game just did not exist in current WoW as nearly all of it had been removed or reworked.

    Does Warframe even have a defined "classic" period?

    I never defined classic tbf, and never said classic, said original. 

    Can we have the audio of the Gauss video re-recorded.

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    24 minutes ago, HugintheCrow said:

    His name is a reference to either Gauss the mathematician, or also probably to the fictional weapon type of the same name.

    Prove it. Like I've said a thousand times no proven relations.

     

    25 minutes ago, HugintheCrow said:

    You keep referencing how you're right logically, well, here's a lesson in logics:

    Quote

     

    "If A implies B, and A is true, B is true."

    "If A and B imply C, and both A and B are true, C is true. "

    Sentence A: Gauss warframe is named literally the same as Gauss the IRL scientist.

    Sentence B: A reference is when you name something the same way (or similarly) to evoke certain associations in whoever watches/reads/otherwise partakes in a medium you've created.

    Sentence C : Gauss (warframe) is a reference to the Gauss (scientist).

    A is true (as it is the basis of the argument from which we derive it). B is true (it's literally a definition and as such I do not need to prove it).

    A and B are both true. Thus C is true.

    Gauss Warframe is named after the Gauss scientist. It's logically proven, thanks for listening to my Ted Talk.

    But A isn't true soooo LOL. So you're illogical too put nice try. Still assumptions. Also C is wrong. And with that B is broad so doesnt matter.

    "Gauss Warframe is named after the Gauss scientist. It's logically proven, thanks for listening to my Ted Talk."

    No, its not, it is not proven just because you said so. You dont DE, nor their intellectual property therin you dont decide or know what the basis of the name is. Thank you for being wrong.

    • Like 1

    Can we have the audio of the Gauss video re-recorded.

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    4 hours ago, HugintheCrow said:

    If you're not trolling, it's actually worse, cause it means you have actual brain damage.

    I'm dead serious, contact a doctor right now, you most likely need instant medical assistance. You might have gotten a heat stroke or something.

    Really because I'm right? It's made by DE, it's owned by DE, it's DE's name, they have their own pronunciation of it, and never said anything about it being named after him.

    Also calm down maybe lol

    When will PRIME ACCESS BUYERS be heard?

    in General

    Posted

    7 hours ago, Ksaero said:

    How is replacing 90d affinity booster and 90d credit booster with 1200 platinum not a solution? You want these boosters so much? Go to the market and buy 30d versions three times each. That's 1200 platinum.

    Lmao because they'd use direct replace based on numbers thank you for understanding marketing LOL. If they had 90d boosters available it'd be less then doing 30d each. Also the $ value of 90d boosters and more platinum still doesn't change its value. Having more items available makes its value higher... you're all looking at this from a "what I want" over a what works perspective...

    Re release original Warframe!

    in General

    Posted

    8 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    Secondly, I didn't say Rhino was only OP at that time. But because how low number the Warframe is and how the Iron skin works (Corpus didn't even have Nullification yet), Rhino is mostly first choice for most Players.

    Uhhh yeah you never said that

    8 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    - Rhino is a Very OP Frame.

    Bruh can't remember what he said a day ago let alone warframe in 2013 smh

    8 hours ago, NocheLuz said:

    Lastly. IDK why you think I'm complain when I'm just layout the Facts. It's feel just like you can't accept it. A lot has change for a more fun experiece. It did make the game easier, but more fun for most people. If you don't have fun with current Warframe and have fun with past Warframe, don't mind me.

    What facts? That you "didn't say rhino was OP"? Lmao. You didnt say facts you said opinions... I can't accept what? That the old game isn't perfect? Sure but it is now lol. I'm not saying remove this Warframe and make it the old one, just make an old one... 

    Can we have the audio of the Gauss video re-recorded.

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    19 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    If an assumption is inevitably correct, the assumption is logical.

    Wrong. It's still an assumption. I'm saying inevitably because I believe somethings can't be changed based on opinions, such as this, so therefore whether this be right or not. At the end of the day to assume is illogical. 

    19 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    Excalibur, the sword frame, isn't named after the legendary Arthurian sword, despite all the evidence to the contrary?

    Again no evidence just coincidence. 

    19 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    You switch players crack me up. All delusional as hell.

    Woah woah woah I play PC, but mine turned into a chainsaw a year ago and haven't fixed or gotten one since :l

    19 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    Yeah, you're absolutely trolling and I'm done wasting my time. I honestly thought better of you

    I'm really not. I could say you're trolling, I mean you are the one assuming everything. Although they may be coincidental assumptions commonly confused for facts, it is still comparably illogical. I'm not spewing facts 100% of the time or anything, but I'm not assuming things based on intellectual virtual properties and peoples names, inventions, and real life events. All though it may be easy to confuse the two when you spend the same amount of time in both video games and life, it's not as easy as they're the same.

    When will PRIME ACCESS BUYERS be heard?

    in General

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, (PS4)cdzbrbr said:

    problem: Most prime access buyers don't want a credit or exp booster since they potentially become useless if you have enough credits and you've maxed everything.

    Wrong, not a problem, and you're only speaking for yourself because boosters are good and people use em and like em and they dont decrease or change price, however removing them does take value, not price. 

    2 minutes ago, (PS4)cdzbrbr said:

    solution: swap said boosters for a resource drop booster and/or platinum.

    Not a solution because the price doesn't change and it actually loses value for new buyers. More than vets buy this, no one will start buying it if there isn't a complete package

    5 minutes ago, (PS4)cdzbrbr said:

    You called those solutions a hassle, just read you previous comment; they're not, they're extremely simple. You also refer to 'system', what system? lol.

    Didn't call it a hassle omfg lol.

    Also the system means the entire way the purchasing works. 

    6 minutes ago, (PS4)cdzbrbr said:

    I'm wrong for trying to improve the perceived value of prime access by proposing solutions that 99% of its buyers agree with?

    A. You are wrong for decreasing its value, whether the prime access adds 2500 or 2400p platinum, doesn't change its value, taking boosters drops its value. Also who are these 99% of buyers? Sounds like just you. Ooo lemme guess "i know people who dont use them too" okay lol 99% of buyers, yall got a group chat?

    8 minutes ago, (PS4)cdzbrbr said:

    You're just a troll, i'm ending this discussion with you since you've no idea what you're talking about.

    More than an idea at you because I look at it from a logical and statistical/value perspective versus "I don't have use for something so 99% of people dont either"

    Can we have the audio of the Gauss video re-recorded.

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    1 minute ago, DeMonkey said:

    It's an assumption based on clear evidence and precedent.

    Provide evidence. Saying they're both spelt the same, that both are related to the high velocity idea, is not evidence. It's coincidental. I've tried explaining to you how this intellectual property stuff works you just don't get it so any precedent would be wrong too...

    "Anyway, it's a presumption he's named after Carl Friedrich Gauss, I don't recall it being stated anywhere by DE..." 

    Like he said.

    4 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    It's illogical, in this regard, to not assume

    No, assuming is always the illogical regard. No matter if it's inevitably right or not, it is always, by definition illogical. You're just wrong there, so wrong.

    5 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    Again, are you going to try this with another frame? What about Excalibur, I don't recall DE ever stating explicitly he's named after the Arthurian sword, and I certainly couldn't find a quote from them for looking

    Because he isn't. 

    6 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    Does that mean we can't actually say he's named after the sword? No, that would be completely illogical because there's clear references and a precedent among other frames.

    No, same arguments, it's wrong. I told you your precedent would be wrong...

    6 minutes ago, DeMonkey said:

    Stop trolling

    Sorry but you're on the wrong side of history here. When is being logical and right ever been trolling?

×
×
  • Create New...