Jump to content
Dante Unbound: Share Bug Reports and Feedback Here! ×
  • 0

Invis + Decoy Loki + Fleeting Expertise


Arabaxus
 Share

Question

I was thinking about whether Fleeting Expertise is worth putting on Loki for duration build or not. Yes I can cast it more often with Fleeting but I have to cast it more often with Fleeting. No Fleeting is more expensive per cast but each cast lasts longer. I was thinking about this two ways:

 

1. Fleeting

http://goo.gl/0N34o3

 

016536250d.PNG

 

2. No Fleeting

http://goo.gl/du2N10

 

e56526fbc8.PNG

 

I mean I'm going to 2 Forma it anyways since I need to have it interchangeable with a Disarm + Switch Tele Build so I can pretty much replace Fleeting with anything if that is the case, so if you have any recommendations, feel free to share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

In my opinion, as long as you can get over 20seconds duration you should be fine.

 

on both builds if you take out constitution, you only lose 3 seconds of invis time, which isn't alot. i think you have plenty of invis time as is, so i'd go with fleeting expertise.

 

you can also try maxing out fleeting expertise then dropping streamline, freeing up another slot, and still have 20secs of invis, due to the arcane helmet.

 

other than that solid builds :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://goo.gl/GyE3VQ

Loki
225
health
225
shield capacity
225
power
65
armor
80
stamina
1.25
sprint speed
--------------------------------------
+60%
melee damage
+60%
power efficiency
+28%
power duration
+40%
knockback recovery
+135%
power range
+50.0%
casting speed
-60%
power strength
Switch Teleport
10.00
power cost
50m
target range
1s
enemy target confused
--------------------------------------
Invisibility
20.00
power cost
15.4 sec
power duration
+400%
melee damage
--------------------------------------
Radial Disarm
40.00
power cost
47.0m
radius
power duration
200.0
icone_impact.pngpuncture to infested chargers
 
Add in Arcane Essence Loki helmet to obtain 75% power efficiency.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, as long as you can get over 20seconds duration you should be fine.

 

on both builds if you take out constitution, you only lose 3 seconds of invis time, which isn't alot. i think you have plenty of invis time as is, so i'd go with fleeting expertise.

 

you can also try maxing out fleeting expertise then dropping streamline, freeing up another slot, and still have 20secs of invis, due to the arcane helmet.

 

other than that solid builds

 

I was thinking about whether Fleeting Expertise is worth putting on Loki for duration build or not. Yes I can cast it more often with Fleeting but I have to cast it more often with Fleeting. No Fleeting is more expensive per cast but each cast lasts longer. I was thinking about this two ways:

 

1. Fleeting

http://goo.gl/0N34o3

 

016536250d.PNG

 

2. No Fleeting

http://goo.gl/du2N10

 

e56526fbc8.PNG

 

I mean I'm going to 2 Forma it anyways since I need to have it interchangeable with a Disarm + Switch Tele Build so I can pretty much replace Fleeting with anything if that is the case, so if you have any recommendations, feel free to share.

If you're doing T4 survivals for long periods, I would drop flow and quick thinking, for vitality and redirection due to the amount of eximus, pack plenty of team energy restores in your gear as 1 tick from these restores will allow you to cast any ability again, and as above you can drop streamline if you got the essence arcane helmet, also drop decoy for radial disarm

Edited by (PS4)D-onlinekilla-4D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way to compare them is a build with full FE instead of Streamline, using Essence Helmet.

 

 

Full FE = 75% Efficiency, -60% duration

Streamline = 45% efficiency, normal duration

 

So with NM, Const, and Contin, you get 23.6 sec for 12.5 cost with Fe and 30.8 sec for 27.5 cost with Streamline. 

 

Thus, 1.888 sec per energy with FE, and 1.12 sec per energy with Streamline. In other words, FE is 68.5% more efficient. It's up to you if that extra efficiency is worth the hassle/danger of recasting more often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While a 34m range on Disarm is acceptable, I prefer to use a 47m range by not using NM. This leaves me with +28% duration for Invis, ~15.4 seconds, which is long enough, imo. I tend to use invis more to escape/travel/revive than as a damage amp for melee tho.

 

Edit: http://warframe-builder.com/Warframes/Builder/Loki_prime/t_30_14401123013_1-1-10-4-3-5-5-9-5-8-10-5-13-7-3-14-6-5-46-2-5-55-8-2-76-0-3-77-4-3-79-5-3_76-2-1-7-46-6-4-9-77-4-79-7-14-5-13-7-55-8-5-11-8-14_71/en/1-0-25/10343/0

Edited by Darzk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Radial Disarm is more useful than Invisibility so you should always optimize it.  You can run a build without Radial Disarm to optimize Invisibility but this is more for stealth or objective missions than for Tower Defense/Survival missions.   Also, don't forget Decoy and Switch Teleport as they can be extremely useful for crowd control and movement.  Loki is the jack of all trades frame that Oberon wishes he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...