Last post wins

[Snyphurr]

27 minutes ago, (Xbox One)TheNarrowRoad said:

You still have the forsaken ruin if that counts for anything.

Nah, what I mentioned wasn't there.

That thread is another one that should be closed as well.

 

We all know why.

[(XBOX)TheNarrowRoad]

8 minutes ago, Snyphurr said:

Nah, what I mentioned wasn't there.

That thread is another one that should be closed as well.

 

We all know why.

I heard that it does but me and a couple others we trying to redirect if if we can...personally I doubt we will.

[(XBOX)TheNarrowRoad]

11 minutes ago, BrownStalin said:

What aboot big insults?

Those are ok.

[Snyphurr]

4 minutes ago, (Xbox One)TheNarrowRoad said:

I heard that it does but me and a couple others we trying to redirect if if we can...personally I doubt we will.

Probably not.

 

*shrug*

[BrownStalin]

9 minutes ago, (Xbox One)TheNarrowRoad said:

I heard that it does but me and a couple others we trying to redirect if if we can...personally I doubt we will.

Forsaken Ruin is a lost cause.

[AerinSol]

http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198060482589

Edited January 5, 2017 by AerinSol

[Snyphurr]

2 minutes ago, AerinSol said:

http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198060482589

That's me.

 

[AerinSol]

Just now, Snyphurr said:

That's me.

 

I searched for "overcompensating kid that appeared in the newspaper"

[Snyphurr]

1 minute ago, AerinSol said:

I searched for "overcompensating kid that appeared in the newspaper"

Yup, that's me.

[Stalker_Cake]

14 minutes ago, AerinSol said:

http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198060482589

Looky looky

11 minutes ago, Snyphurr said:

That's me.

 

Indeed it is

[Snyphurr]

Just now, Stalker_Cake said:

Indeed it is

Or is it?

[AerinSol]

Just now, Snyphurr said:

Or is it?

Well...as a foreigner all you people look the same...

[Snyphurr]

Just now, AerinSol said:

Well...as a foreigner all you people look the same...

Ok.

[AerinSol]

 

Proof that off-topic has always been epic.

[Snyphurr]

8 minutes ago, AerinSol said:

 

Proof that off-topic has always been epic.

I agree.

 

Make every frame Haydee.

Edited January 5, 2017 by Snyphurr

[Azrael]

For you riven enthusiasts. I just did something stupid. I paid an ungodly amount of plat for this mod:

Spoiler

 

[Stalker_Cake]

10 minutes ago, Snyphurr said:

Or is it?

Yes

9 minutes ago, AerinSol said:

Well...as a foreigner all you people look the same...

You mean you tiny people are differant?

7 minutes ago, AerinSol said:

 

Proof that off-topic has always been epic.

Yes, more boobs and jiggle physics to extend our lives

5 minutes ago, Azrael said:

For you riven enthusiasts. I just did something stupid. I paid an ungodly amount of plat for this mod:

  Hide contents

 

Nice riven

[Azrael]

2 minutes ago, Stalker_Cake said:

Nice riven

I can make a true 100% status kohm with only 3 dual stats, when it used to require 4 dual stats and nano-applicator. It is literally my dream come true.

[Stalker_Cake]

1 minute ago, Azrael said:

I can make a true 100% status kohm with only 3 dual stats, when it used to require 4 dual stats and nano-applicator. It is literally my dream come true.

Too bad it isn't Twin kohm

[Azrael]

5 minutes ago, Stalker_Cake said:

Too bad it isn't Twin kohm

that's a secondary though. It's not as much fun, or as strong.  :)

[Stalker_Cake]

Just now, Azrael said:

that's a secondary though. It's not as much fun, or as strong.  :)

S#&$, i'm mixing kohm with kohmak again!

[MegpoidBeetle]

Ima having difficulty understanding the difference between a return function and void function in C++.

Any kind soul that could explain in a way that a numbskull like me should be able to understand?

[Spot.]

You'll never take me alive space man!

[Azrael]

29 minutes ago, GiraffaYandereBeetle said:

Ima having difficulty understanding the difference between a return function and void function in C++.

Any kind soul that could explain in a way that a numbskull like me should be able to understand?

it's been a while, so I may make some mistakes here. But if I recall correctly, a void function has no return value because it doesn't return anything. So you might use a void function to change something that has been passed by reference, while a return function would return a value that could be used by some other function.

So suppose you have a variable X. If you want to increase it by one, you might pass it to this function:

VOID increment(int input)

       { input += 1;}

 

Or you might pass it to this function

INT increment(int input)

     { return input + 1; }

in the second case, you haven't changed anything. So to increment X using the first function you would write:

increment(X);

But with the second function you would have to write:

X = increment(X);

 

A third option is to define the function as follows:

BOOL increment(int input)

     {

      input +=1;

     IF(conditions) {

           return 1;

    ELSE

         return 0;}}

 

This function returns a BOOL value which we might use as input validation. The "conditions" refers to error-checking code, although there are better ways to do this. The point is that there IS a return value, but it's not really related to what the function is doing. We are using it for something else.

These functions return some kind of value such as an INt or BOOL, whereas the first one needs no return value and therefore can be declared as a VOID function, because there's no need for a return type.

[Stalker_Cake]

1 minute ago, Azrael said:

it's been a while, so I may make some mistakes here. But if I recall correctly, a void function has no return value because it doesn't return anything. So you might use a void function to change something that has been passed by reference, while a return function would return a value that could be used by some other function.

So suppose you have a variable X. If you want to increase it by one, you might pass it to this function:

VOID increment(int input)

       { input += 1;}

 

Or you might pass it to this function

INT increment(int input)

     { return input + 1; }

in the second case, you haven't changed anything. So to increment X using the first function you would write:

increment(X);

But with the second function you would have to write:

X = increment(X);

 

A third option is to define the function as follows:

BOOL increment(int input)

     {

      input +=1;

     IF(conditions) {

           return 1;

    ELSE

         return 0;}}

 

This function returns a BOOL value which we might use as input validation. The "conditions" refers to error-checking code, although there are better ways to do this. The point is that there IS a return value, but it's not really related to what the function is doing. We are using it for something else.

These functions return some kind of value such as an INt or BOOL, whereas the first one needs no return value and therefore can be declared as a VOID function, because there's no need for a return type.

neeeeeerd alert!