Jump to content

PatternistSlave

PC Member
  • Posts

    1,056
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PatternistSlave

  1. 1 hour ago, Omega said:

    I don't see prices tanking on most items, only stuff that has been in circulation for over 3 years.

    What type of items do you think new players are likely to have?  "Well I'll be fine." isn't an argument.

    2 minutes ago, Avienas said:

    the main topic at hand

    The main topic is someone thought they should have plat despite not having time or money to spend on the game.  That's not how games work.

  2. On 2020-01-12 at 9:55 AM, (PS4)BlightDragon89 said:

    the extra work

    This isn't "extra" work.  This work is currently being paid for.  You want to remove it.  Well guess what.  You're also be removing the plat that can currently be earned doing it.

    On 2020-01-12 at 9:55 AM, (PS4)BlightDragon89 said:

    I'm pretty much suggesting that DE make a Warframe Market type thing in game.

    The third party sites already drive down prices and you're either too shortsighted to see the consequences of this or don't care.

    On 2020-01-12 at 9:55 AM, (PS4)BlightDragon89 said:

    not mean that it has to be that way forever

    If you want the plat you're currently earning it does.  This plat you think you're entitled to just for playing the game same as everyone else is a fantasy.

    Oh and I think we should step back and remember why this thread was started.  Someone that doesn't have time to play the game and also doesn't want to spend money thinks they should have plat.  Ask yourself why you think this works as a business model.  Giving away content to those that don't spend time or money on your game.

  3. On 2020-01-10 at 6:52 PM, (PS4)BlightDragon89 said:

    At no point in this trade market is it pay to win.

    We can argue semantics all day, but that's not remotely on topic.

    On 2020-01-10 at 6:52 PM, (PS4)BlightDragon89 said:

    Think about it that way, and you'll understand why having DE set the prices would be way, way worse for the community overall.

    DE already do to a large extent (They make the very currency we're using.) and I don't know why you're writing this to me.   Did you maybe quote the wrong person?  I never said anything about DE doing anything.  The current trading works well as it is as you indicate.

    14 hours ago, (PS4)BlightDragon89 said:

    I totally agree, let us list sets, parts, any tradable for X amount, take it our of our inventory. People go to a screen, terminal ect, search for the item they want, and buy it. The system handles the trade, takes most the plat to the lister and the item to the buyer. Take the usual trade tax, and bang, all done without sitting in trade chat forever. Would love if DE would do this. I appreciate the outside sites that facilitate this, but it would be much better in an in game system.

    So an auction house.  Know how you were just talking about how easy it was for you to make plat even as a new player?  Say goodbye to that.  What exactly do you think happens to prices should it become convenient for millions of player to passively list every piece of trash in their inventory?  If watching chat for a bit is too big a hardship for you?  You don't deserve free plat.

    • Like 1
  4. 12 hours ago, (PS4)BlightDragon89 said:

    air standard by many people in trade chat to set good prices

    The absolute lowest possible price is not "good".  It's in fact exceedingly bad for the game.  Prices being low means time has less value than money.  Ala more pay2win.  Lower prices means it's harder for new free players to get any plat.  That site is a perfect example of why an auction house is a really really bad idea.

  5. They just need to fix affinity not being shared so someone can go off and stealth kill while everyone else does the actual mission and everyone gets XP.  It's not that big a deal to get intrinsics anyway tho.  I'm at 9889 and have never done the stealth thing.

  6. The railjack guns and battle avionics could stand balancing (the ability to armor strip being required should the Roar thing be fixed), but overall I like the mode.  Engineer is especially fun although I would like the tactical grid upgrades to apply properly and for there to be more tactical avionics.  Using WF abilities with the tactical menu seems pretty useless.  The combat is fun, but there could be more varied enemies and mission types.  Loot/XP needs to be shared regardless of the mission so everyone doesn't have to go into the sentient ship and stealth killing isn't a solo endeavor.  Putting the drops from the sentient caches into actual railjack mission rewards would also be welcome.

  7. I personally avoid the missions with more objectives than just killing and I feel like the ability to remote hack them would be an improvement.  Having a minigame attached a bonus.  Also be really cool if the objectives were actual spy vault like objectives that then like the engineer could make easier with remote hacking.

    • Like 1
  8. On 2019-12-15 at 7:05 PM, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    that doesn't get people to play conclave.  That just allows people to bypass playing conclave to achieve its rewards.

    You can keep repeating this ad nauseam, but that doesn't make it true.

    On 2019-12-15 at 7:05 PM, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    If the UMs are that small in value when it comes to contribution to the conclave syndicate, why even care about the UMs?

    Because they're at least something to add variety to a ridiculous grind.

    On 2019-12-15 at 7:05 PM, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    Just play conclave and youll get the standing.

    Unfortunately the mode and its reward system are broken.

  9. 22 hours ago, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    But the fundamental issue with them, it that they don't cause people to play conclave. They allow players to bypass conclave.

    Have you any idea how many medallions it would cost to get everything in conclave and how rare a drop they are?  If a player is willing to put in that amount of effort to "bypass" your mode that's pretty telling.

    22 hours ago, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    how do UMs get people to play conclave?

    And you've already been answered.  Did you not like the answer or do you need it explained to you?

  10. 7 hours ago, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    How do UMs get people to play conclave,

    By introducing them to the rewards.  Same reason we're given starting plat.  Priming the pump it's called.

    7 hours ago, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    fix conclave's issues,

    One of the big issues being a broken reward system they at least help with that.

    7 hours ago, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    or even improve the rewards in conclave?

    Rewards should be simply showered on players by a dead mode.  Currently the system, having been designed for longevity to sustain a non-existent playerbase, is way too stingy.  Anything to lessen the grind would be a huge benefit.

  11. 31 minutes ago, ----Legacy---- said:

    Don't forget that people like you still cry over Universal Medallions because these are just that: a "workaround" to get conclave standing for those who dislike pvp.

    A bandaid solution is still better than none at all or putting the impetus on players, divorced from regulation, to provide said solution themselves.  This narrative of "those who dislike pvp" is extremely disingenuous.  I don't dislike PvP.  I don't even hate Conclave.  It's unplayable is the issue.  Surely even in your wildest aggrandizing you'll admit the reward structure was designed for a larger playerbase.

  12. 2 minutes ago, Miyabi-sama said:

    Do you freakin understand I can not legit trade with 85% of playerbase due to issues Steve touched in his last stream? Do you understand I can not receive invites, no one can receive mine, I can not join games in progress but people can join me, and I can not find myself conclave matches or trade with people without turning on a freakin VPN service?

    I'm sorry?  Sounds like something that should be fixed?

    2 minutes ago, Miyabi-sama said:

    Do I whine about it? No.

    Well you should.

    3 minutes ago, Miyabi-sama said:

    Did I somenthing to find a workaround? Yes.

    Shouldn't have to use "workarounds" to address issues.

  13. 6 hours ago, Miyabi-sama said:

    Ask your friendzo to invite you in a random match, maybe you'll even find a full lobby.

    Perfect illustration of how out of touch with reality these forums are.  A player messing about with their buddies is nothing resembling legit standing and these lobbies you speak of are abject fantasy..

  14. 11 hours ago, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    Is that supposed to demonstrate you didn't arrange the match ahead of time, that 3 is a popular time on xbox, or that you hit the lottery and actually found a match?  I have no experience with xbox, but that isn't reality on PC and I find it hard to believe they would be that different.  If so?  Good for you.  Do you think your experience renders it not a problem for others?

  15. On 2019-12-08 at 5:52 PM, (XB1)The Repo Man151 said:

    Nobody is stopping you from queuing for a match and playing conclave. Nobody is holding a lato vandal to the back of your head saying that if you play conclave that they will shoot you. You can play conclave and get standing right now, literally.

    No I cannot.  Literally.

    mhWK5hH.png

  16. 3 hours ago, Miyabi-sama said:

    Maybe try and invite some friendzo's to get your standing huh?

    We're talking about legitimate standing.

    2 hours ago, Sevek7 said:

    I don't have any hope of actually convincing you

    Convincing me of what?  That some of you saw UMs as the clear benefit they were?  You don't need to.  I know that.  I don't know why you feel the need to argue with me then.

  17. 23 hours ago, Miyabi-sama said:

    Who denies you a legitimate way of obtaining Cc standing?

    You are indirectly if you're arguing against Universal Medallions, but the system in its current state does directly.  The playerbase needed to legitimatize the reward system doesn't exist.  The lack of players makes obtaining legitimate Conclave standing extremely difficult for most and literally impossible for some.

  18. 14 hours ago, Sevek7 said:

    "It's not enough that I should get what I want, I also insist that others are denied what they want!"

    Exactly.  The PvP community had some delusion the rewards were sacrosanct and that other players should be denied a legitimate way to obtain.

    8 hours ago, Tyreaus said:

    A: players attempting to get Conclave rewards and running into the brick wall of problems that Conclave bears or B: players concerned that development time might be spent on things comparatively few people like, taking away from the big PvE things.

    Can't it be both?

  19. On 2019-12-04 at 9:02 PM, Stormdragon said:

    It's just a single thread where only OP is supporting that position unlike the "dozen?"

    You asked for an example and I gave you one.  There were others.   Yeah I was being nice saying a dozen.   There's probably only a half dozen people that play conclave truth be told.

    On 2019-12-04 at 9:02 PM, Stormdragon said:

    adding a new way to get its stuff doesn't fix any of them

    It does fix the reward system somewhat which I said.

    On 2019-12-04 at 9:02 PM, Stormdragon said:

    Nah, you haven't been reported despite the amount of posts looking down on the community

    I would know and yes most certainly was repeatedly.

    On 2019-12-04 at 9:02 PM, Stormdragon said:

    Got a link to the notes of that hotfix?

    You can try to find it for yourself if you don't believe me as it's kindof beside the point anyway, but yeah they accidentally shipped it and had to then patch it back out.

    On 2019-12-04 at 9:02 PM, Stormdragon said:

    i'd prefer to get to a middle point where UMs can be used in PvP while conclave also gets the development (and advertising) it deserves as part of the game.

    So you're holding UMs hostage.  No improvements can happen without a complete overhaul.

    On 2019-12-04 at 9:02 PM, Stormdragon said:

    Most of the horror stories of players being unable to find matches are just because the RNG matchmaking used in both conclave and PvE is too unreliable for a PvP environment

    You're living in a fantasy world.  I've done a good deal of searching for matches.  The playbase isn't there to support it.  You guys are only on from like 9 to 10 pm and it's nigh impossible to find matches any other time.

    On 2019-12-04 at 9:02 PM, Stormdragon said:

    So did i, but i guess it's gonna be a recurring thread

    Yeah I wouldn't expect us to just forget about it any time soon.

×
×
  • Create New...