Blyker Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 The calculation of the Tau resistance from Umbral Intensify, Fiber and Vitality is wrong 1 Equipped mod Expected =11% Actual = 11% 2 Equipped mods Expected -> 2x13.8 = 27.6% Actual = 25.6% 3 Equipped mods Expected -> 3x19.3 = 57.9% Actual = 47.3% There might be some rounding on the numbers but that should matter 0.1-0.15% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verreater Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 Not a bug, its multiplicative now and DE mentioned this in patch notes. Quote Update 30.5 (2021-07-06) Damage Resistance Mod Math Changes: The following changes occurred due to the following scenario being shared: A player reported that combining Umbral Mods + Adaptation + Lightning Rod on any Warframe made them fully immune to all damage from the Hydrolyst Eidolon. Prior to this discovery, we already made sure we couldn’t reach 100% Damage Resistance because that would just be excessive in all cases. You can see this in action when we capped the ‘In Air’ Damage Resistance Mods. Even though the Mods theoretically could reach 100% Damage Resistance, there is a hard cap at 90%. In response and to avoid future oversights, we have changed the way Damage Resistance works. It now works on ‘Damage Remaining’ instead of having all the Modifiers combined and operating at once. Example: Consider the case of: 4x 25% Damage Resistance Mods WAS: (25% + 25% + 25% + 25%) = 100% Damage Reduction NEW: Take 25% Less Damage = Only take 75% Damage 0.75 x 0.75 x 0.75 x 0.75 = 31.5% damage taken AKA 68.5% damage reduction So with each mod providing 19.25% damage reduction = 80.75% damage taken = 0.8075*0.8075*0.8075 = 52.65% damage taken = 47.35% damage reduction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blyker Posted November 17, 2021 Author Share Posted November 17, 2021 That sounds good thanks i had missed that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.