Renegade343 Posted November 7, 2015 Author Share Posted November 7, 2015 That does not explain. Let me guess. You are the one using bras. Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArchPhaeton Posted November 8, 2015 Share Posted November 8, 2015 Impressive, tenno. However I have a couple observations - If you are using these pictures to take measures, scale ("zoom level") is important; we are doing these measurements parting from the assumption that the scales in both pictures are equal, yet this may not be true. You mention a magnification correction, does this refers to the scale of both pictures? - If both pictures have the same scale, visually comparing them, orphid seems to have a lower volume than vanilla. I used your own pics for comparison: While I can't tell if your math is right or wrong (and I'm assuming you aren't trolling) It would be much more precise applied to orthogonal projections with the same scale, i.e. If we could put the models in 3d modeling or viewing software then take the pictures. Also, I vote up for the backside measure comparison, I'm really curious on that one since you can't even see there with orphid :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade343 Posted November 8, 2015 Author Share Posted November 8, 2015 Impressive, tenno. However I have a couple observations - If you are using these pictures to take measures, scale ("zoom level") is important; we are doing these measurements parting from the assumption that the scales in both pictures are equal, yet this may not be true. You mention a magnification correction, does this refers to the scale of both pictures? - If both pictures have the same scale, visually comparing them, orphid seems to have a lower volume than vanilla. I used your own pics for comparison: While I can't tell if your math is right or wrong (and I'm assuming you aren't trolling) It would be much more precise applied to orthogonal projections with the same scale, i.e. If we could put the models in 3d modeling or viewing software then take the pictures. Also, I vote up for the backside measure comparison, I'm really curious on that one since you can't even see there with orphid :( To answer your question: 1. I have checked for both these models, and the magnification level is very close to each other. 2. You did something wrong with comparing the sizes. You are supposed to line up the back side of the two models. What you done would always make the original skin look like it has a larger breast size. And there is that little thing: The answer may be wrong, but I am very sure that my methods and logic are correct, for it applies the correct knowledge of perspectives and coordinate geometry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celaeon_ Posted November 8, 2015 Share Posted November 8, 2015 You by far are the BREAST member of our community, i salute you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade343 Posted November 8, 2015 Author Share Posted November 8, 2015 Corrected the calculations, as I left out a spot to include in the circumference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwolfknight Posted November 8, 2015 Share Posted November 8, 2015 Good good now for nyx/nemesis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonNine Posted January 8, 2016 Share Posted January 8, 2016 personally i dont care what size she is to me flat is justice, big is benevolent i like them both (we need more loli frames)but.... just because they are bigger doesnt mean there shape is better which seems to be the case and the overall feel of the newer skin. The older skin just seem plumper more natural they may be smaller but the new one is kinda like breast implants yeah there bigger but if you squeeze them something is just off. Big girl didnt need a boob job she just needed those curves to be proportionately done.... if they were the same size as they are in the new skin but still nice and plump we wouldnt be having this conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(XBOX)Jes9119 Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Would you do Saryn Prime next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverBones Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Well. Was not expecting this. Frankly, I admire your math skills and tenacity for the truth, but yeah... This thread is pretty much painting mathematicians with a sweaty, forever alone, basement-bound brush. Locking it up, sirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts