(PSN)cleefsentence
-
Posts
263 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by (PSN)cleefsentence
-
-
Holy shiet so i wasn't the only one...
-
Taveuni survival, at the top of the screen when you select the kuva fortress.
Get a 3 day booster resources from the market and enjoy 800 kuva every tower before the even booster expires in 24h (they stacks).
-
1
-
-
I like the vandal more than the normal version but i have a good riven to boost the dmg.
ps. the glaxion is a beast with a riven (i have one electricity toxin cd and it shreds 3/4 corrupted heavy/bombards lvl. 155 before the reload, hope to see a vandal version with more cc).
-
2 hours ago, (PS4)RenovaKunumaru said:
Never. They made an extremely vague post about Tennogen that had grammatical errors and literally said nothing.
This.
-
3 hours ago, Reifnir said:
Play solo.
You can survive pretty much on Life Support stations alone unless you hide in a corner and try to camp (which doesn't really work with Arbitration survivals).
Yes, it does take a naturally tanky frame (Nidus, Inaros, Valk or perhaps Wukong, or even Nezha), but it's perfectly doable and is a 100% working way to avoid early leavers.
I don't even play arbitrations anymore (you resumed a topic of one month ago), got all i need in 2 days and yes i played solo most of the time to not waste my time.
This doesn't change the fact that spawn of enemies in survival and excavation is sh1t compared to the spawn when in a team.
-
DE: changed the recoil of the vasto prime to be the same of the akvasto prime.
-
14 minutes ago, -Temp0- said:
Doesnt change the demn thing, because surprise surprise, the higher the level the higher the armor. What kills lv 150 will be irrelevant against lv 500 or 1000.
Dont try to weasel your way out with this stupid "obviously". The only thing that's obvious here is that you've no idea what you're talking about.
What out, we have a badass here.
Do you know that enemies have a base values and some of them got higher stats (a butcher armor is not the same of a bombard)? Do you know that your lvl 500 and 1000 is not something that you have to face in the game and not recognized by DE? DE game is designed around a max level of 100, if you're a try harder good for you, go play your endurance run.
And chill down too.
-
5 hours ago, Blackthorn66 said:
This isn't even close to confirmation that they'll never touch the Kohm. In fact, I don't see the word "never" in there at all. All they'd have to do is buff the base status, and boom, they can touch the riven dispo all they want. Especially since they have NOT confirmed THAT they'd never touch the Kohm.
Sure, but if they buff the base stats even with a lower dispo the kohm power would not change at all and they will still threat the kohm as a special case.
4 hours ago, -Temp0- said:Lv 150 the strongest enemies you will encounter... Thats cute.
Also enjoy the slap in the face plebs that liked the lanka and plasmor and whose builds ALSO 'DEPEND ON RIVENS' , because of course everyones equal but some are more so than others. Corruption level and hypocricy here doesnt cease to impress me personally.
Welcome, seems that you don't know how to read, that's cute:
Quoteversus lvl. 150 corrupted bombards and heavy gunners, the strongest enemies you may will encounter in the game cause of their armor value so high.
i was referring to the enemies type (high armored ones) not their level, pretty clear for me.
-
2 minutes ago, ----Legacy---- said:
They cared about it and they probably noticed that the weapon usage increased mainly thanks to people with a riven for it, but still the increase might have been not enough to justify the disposition drop they had in mind and decided to give it a free pass this time.
You should stop being so narrow minded and try to see things from a different angle instead of getting bitter even at the smallest things.
Yeah because the narrow minded here is me, so funny.
Sadly for you 5 years of game and choices by DE repeated over time in the same way, except for just the kohm case (that casually has an overpriced riven market behind it) totally bashing that "they care about kohm usage!" without too much effort by me.
-
23 minutes ago, Skaleek said:
Nothing should get special treatment. Just because a riven disposition threatens to ruin a weapons "way of working" doesnt mean it should be exempt. The recent riven changes messed up more than 1 of my builds. Its the price of progress, nothing should be exempt from this.
Seems that some peoples can't understand the "special" definition:
QuoteDefinition of special
(Entry 1 of 2)
1: distinguished by some unusual quality especially : being in some way superiorour
2: held in particular esteem
3a: readily distinguishable from others of the same category : UNIQUE
b: of, relating to, or constituting a species : SPECIFIC
4: being other than the usual : ADDITIONAL, EXTRA
3 minutes ago, Dabnician said:You all got Excalibur umbra instead so really you didnt really lose anything and its better than excal prime.
I'm not complaining about ex prime, just take him as an example.
-
11 minutes ago, Blackthorn66 said:
When did they confirm that it will NEVER be touched?
DE itself acknowledged the need of keeping a dispo 5 to not ruin the weapon for those that DEPENDS on them.
You just have to read, this is an official post by DE Connor in the Riven topic:
QuoteEDIT: Wanted to clear up one comment I'm seeing lots of. Many of you have mentioned the Kohm as well as Detron - These weapons were marked for a reduction, but we opted not to change them, because some players depend on these Rivens to achieve 100% status chance. Because of this, small disposition changes had the chance to make a much larger impact on these weapons, so we have left them as is.
If they change the dispo after saying that good luck with the backlash. Do you know about excalibur prime? There is no law paper or contract about the exclusivity for what i know, just DE promise to not release him to show respect to something happened 5 years ago.
If they would to change the dispo in a remote future all players can quote that post and be right about the injustice of that decision.
-
42 minutes ago, ----Legacy---- said:
OP seems to fail to understand that kohm is one of those weapons that nearly nobody used until rivens became a thing, which explains its high disposition and could be extrapolated as a way to explain DE's decision of not changing it now.
If the disposition changes were made keeping in mind the feelings of the owners or player investment, as OP claims, riven dispositions would only have either remained unchanged or gotten a bump instead of having many of them drop due to the weapon becoming popular for specific tasks (like lanka or rubico with eidolon hunts), getting a strong variant (lato with the re-release of Vandal, tiberon with the release of prime) or gets rebalanced and becomes viable on its own (like happened with sicarus) while keeping high disposition. Afaik, rivens for all of the weapons i gave as examples were expensive and still got their disposition dropped regardless.
And you're failing to understand that the kohm usage is not something that DE would care, like they haven't care in these past 5 years with the nerf of weapons and frames and now with the dispo nerf of 90% of the meta weapons in the game.
If they refuse to change something is for a specific reason.
Let's list the possible reasons for the unchanged kohm dispo:
1) An huge ignorance by DE about the game weapons power (DE doesn't know that with 4 60% 60% mods the kohm can reach 100% status, wow, can be this?)
2) Reasons related to the market that these rivens have (prices of groll rivens around 10k/20k plat, lots of money involved)
3) Scare to kill kohm usage (but in 5 years they have nerfed every thing that was too op without care about consequences, never buffed unused weapons like stug and kraken. They wanted to change the dispo originally too so the problem for them exist)
4) Other understandable reasons that i would really like to listen by DE (missing so...)
So many choices...
-
1 hour ago, Ragnarok said:
Your* and can't see how since mine was based in an objective view of the situation. Copying my insults just makes you unoriginal.
Oh really?
1 hour ago, Ragnarok said:If you can't understand this then that's pretty sad, it's also quite sad that you think this is an issue about plat cost.
You're so original.
1 hour ago, Ragnarok said:This has nothing to do with rivens. The past changes were mechanic in nature. We're discussing disposition adjustments. If you're upset that DE is gimping maiming strike by mechanically changing how melee works, then bring it up in another thread it has nothing to contribute here.
They don't nerf everything too powerful, usually it's when they disagree with the mechanic being used or it's become excessively meta defining and again cost clearly doesn't mean much when other equally expensive weapons still received a nerf.
And even when it could reach 120% before rivens noone used the kohm. Hell, even after rivens it was barely used because few people realized what breakpoints the rivens allowed. Once it became well known is when it spiked in popularity. It's current usage is a result of it's current disposition, if nerfed to where it can't reach these breakpoints then it's usage will drop moreso than any other weapon. If you can't understand this then that's pretty sad, it's also quite sad that you think this is an issue about plat cost.
Any thing that DE see as too powerful will receive a nerf sooner or later. This is a constant, like gravity.
The unchanged dispo of the kohm is something that the usual DE would nerf without think too much, as stated by DE Connor they wanted to change the dispo originally but later they changed their mind because "some players depend on these Rivens to achieve 100% status chance".
Something become meta when is the best option available. Most of the times the meta stuff is broken, this is true for weapons, warframes, mods and rivens. When something that is meta gets DE attention there are very high chance that they will do something about.
As i can already say to you in another topic (really, pretty bored to write the same stuff ya know) if DE really wants to stop you to abuse of a weapon they will do it anyway, they can:
- Lower the base stats so even with a riven the weapon can't be saved (stug case)
- Change a mechanic like the plasmor headshot multiplier
- Change dispo of rivens so op weapons can't break the game too much
- Change op mods (maiming strike soon and maybe hunter munitions someday)
This is true even for frames (they can lower their damage stats, like the miasma dmg of saryn with the chimera update).
1 hour ago, Ragnarok said:And even when it could reach 120% before rivens noone used the kohm. Hell, even after rivens it was barely used because few people realized what breakpoints the rivens allowed. Once it became well known is when it spiked in popularity. It's current usage is a result of it's current disposition, if nerfed to where it can't reach these breakpoints then it's usage will drop moreso than any other weapon.
DE itself know that kohm with dispo 5 is something that deserves a change (as stated by DE Connor), so the problem for them EXIST and is not something that i'm inventing. They changed their minds tho, for reasons that are probably market related. The alternative is only an ignorance from DE about kohm stats and the possibility to reach that 100% status chance with the 4 60% 60& mods. Your "DE changed their mind to avoid the death of kohm usage!" doesn't have sense, because DE in 5 years (FIVE) already proved that something too much good to be true has a very shot life. Can be a mechanic, a disposition of a riven, the stats of a weapon. They don't care what players will think. If too broken = nerf.
I am basing my statements on 5 years of game history and DE behavior in this time frame. What do you base on to give credit to your statement "DE decided to not change kohm dispo to avoid usage death"? Do you have stats usage of the kohm of the past before the boom of rivens and of a possible future after a change of the dispo? Let's see them.
ps. i don't need to open a topic about maiming strike. I don't care if they will nerf that mod btw because is too broken.
-
17 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:
Stop crying like you're somehow a victim. Noone is more special, I explained to you why their reasoning makes sense but you keep ignoring it and pretending like it's because of preferential treatment. Vectis and Lanka mods can go for just as much as kohm rivens, but both of them got a lowered disposition, it's likely that market cost/weapon strength had nothing to do with the decision making my explanation far more fitting.
Your behavior is honestly pathetic, thank god you aren't in control of balancing anything in this game.
What a coincidence, i think that you're explanation is honestly pathetic.
I already proved you that DE doesn't care at all about non-usage of weapons or mods, the past nerfs of weapons like symulor and tonkor, the existence of of sh1tty weapons like the stug and the kraken that can't be saved even with a 5 dispo and no one use, the future death of maiming strike by the introduction of the melee 3.0.
DE nerf every thing that can break their game and is too powerful. If they are not changed the dispo of the kohm is because some "geniuses" purchased grolled kohm riven for 10k/20k plat, that's the only reason they want to keep the dispo of 5 on the kohm.
Kohm can reach the 100% status chance with 4 60% 60% mods, the rivens are a luxury, not a necessity. This is a FACT, not an opinion. Their reason is money-oriented and to avoid a backlash by those owners, if you can't understand something so simple well... so sad for you.
-
11 minutes ago, (XB1)ECCHO SIERRA said:
This is hilarious on 2 levels.
A) a kohm with the right riven is arguably the most powerful weapon in the entire game but, you know, akbolto had to get nerfed.
B) see above.
If they're going to leave kohm alone they should leave the others alone too.
Seems that kohm grolled owners are more special to DE than any other riven owner, see DE Connor quote.
-
- Machete
- Fukin expensive to craft
That weapons can sit forever in my foundry waiting to be crafted.
-
I can understand rivens rebalancing. What is not good is treat some players (kohm groll owners) in a special way.
The kohm doesn't need to have a 5 disposition and a +120% status chance roll to be strong, as you can see in the gif below my "not so godly riven" can sh1t on lvl 150 enemies, so why DE haven't touched his dispo?
-
9 minutes ago, Tangent-Valley said:
On Edit #2.
Rip those that purchased sentinel rivens for 1k plat 😂
-
Source please?
-
They will nerf them anyway so no 😄
-
18 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:
An entire mechanic change is a little bit different than a disposition change. Also DE even came out and said that maiming strike led to a meta that they didn't quite intend it to, which is why they originally nerfed it from attacking through walls and objects.
Yeah, that's what I was explaining. It makes sense and I agree with not changing the disposition because that would be the eventual outcome.
If DE really wants to stop you to abuse of a weapon they will do it anyway, they can:
- Lower the base stats so even with a riven the weapon can't be saved (stug case)
- Change a mechanic like the plasmor headshot multiplier
- Change dispo of rivens so op weapons can't break the game too much
- Change op mods (maiming strike soon and maybe hunter munitions someday)
For me the decision is market related, not usage related. They don't care if you stop to use a weapon (tonkor and simulor) or a frame (nukes like ember). We have seen this many times in the past so is a logical conclusion to say that the kohm with a dispo 5 is something that normally DE would nerf instant. If they don't want to do it is because there are people that would be more pissed than the plasmor riven guy.
-
10 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:
? I said I supported the decision, however I laid out that I believe the decision is a rational one not simply "thank you for not nerfing my sacred cow", I think a legitimate case can be made for why it shouldn't be lowered.
I'm not talking about time or plat investment. I'm talking about usage and stat setup weighting.
Not special from my perspective, just there is a clear difference between the weapons and their utilization with rivens. There is no stat on the arca plasmor or the lanka that will nerf it's usage by 90% if it dropped by 5-8%, this however is the case with the kohm.
I think that if you are put into a situation where if a specific weapons riven is nerfed that it's usage would drop so drastically that it would have to be raised in the next balance, then you should make the determination that it's in a spot where it should stay.
DE will nerf maiming strike with melee 3.0, people will get rid of it from any build. A mod sitted in the meta zone for years and selled for very high prices, but this is not stopping them to kill it.
I can only think that the reason behind the unchanged kohm disposition is more than "kohm usage will drop too much". See the nerf of tonkor and simulor. People literally stopped to use them and seems that DE don't care about that.
-
15 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:
It's unlikely to affect the prices at all actually. Regardless, I think the kohm is unique in this regard specifically because the makeup of the market for it's rivens was so heavily one sided into this specific stat setup and it's one where it's so sensitive to a disposition adjustment that it shouldn't be lowered but it also should never be raised. It's in that sweet spot where it can barely reach the ideal setup. Outside of the detron and 1 or 2 other weapons, I can't think of a weapon with a riven community so hyper focused on a very specific stat lineup involving breakpoints. I think it's just practical to not ruin the entire reason players were investing in that weapon to begin with. (Also runs into the scenario where the kohm becomes popular because of it's disposition > it's disposition is lowered > people just drop it entirely > so it's disposition goes back up, so I legitimately think it's a weapon that should be static in it's disposition.) Where other weapons just aren't affected to the same degree.
Granted I'm biased because I am one of those people who spent 20k+ for one and I'm happy DE is looking at this in an objective way for the most part. I'm not saying they should do it one way or the other, I am saying I support the way they chose to go about it though.
Bro no offense but you're a kohm +120% riven owner right? If so, obviously you're happy 😁
We all have invested in rivens, i have friends with 200+ rolled rubico rivens. I rolled some rivens 80+ times too after so much kuva farm to burn out and leave the game for a while.
DE with this decision is making Kohm rivens and their owners specials and untouchable. This a spit in the face to all those players that worked on their plasmor/lanka/bla bla rivens as kohm owners did.
Not saying that DE can't rebalance dispositions, just to be equal.
-
2 minutes ago, VanDisaster said:
Have to say, who cares? idiots will buy at whatever price, everyone else will just ignore their existence. Nothing should be balanced on market price in this game, this isn't Eve.
The problem is that those rivens will be untouchable, unlike others. DE said that they will keep the kohm disposition as it is now because there are people that DEPENDS on that 120% status chance roll. Seems right to you to treat those rivens (and their owners) in a special way?
(PS4, XB1, Switch) Equinox Attachment colors defaulting regardless of customization
in General
Posted
Same and still no fix even after the last hotfix.