Jump to content

Tinklzs

PC Member
  • Content Count

    474
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

576

About Tinklzs

  • Rank
    Gold Disciple

Recent Profile Visitors

1,655 profile views
  1. They have 310 employees according to the wiki - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Extremes. Which is 90 shy of Bethesda's 400 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethesda_Game_Studios. So they have plenty. That is a non-issue, the community is split currently between solo and group focused players, that won't change no matter what, and shouldn't be focused on. Warframe is advertised as a co-op looter shooter, in every trailer (besides prime trailers) they show warframes working together for a common goal, including the newest CGI trailer at tennocon. Yet, like I've said before, volt/mag would be fighting for top spot on kills and excalibur would struggle to get a kill due to those two frames. And while some players prefer solo, doesn't mean that those that prefer groups should be alienated. If you like solo stuff and don't want to group up - then don't, but just because you don't want to doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't get additional content, even if that content requires other players / teamwork to beat/defeat/complete that content. Means someone will have to go out of their comfort zone, but worry not the other 99% of Warframe is completely soloable, so don't whine because 1% of it isn't. Why is challenging content and better rewards separate, why can't they be the same? We have arbitrations, which is harder than star chart, with (mostly) better rewards. The duplicate cosmetic rewards + relics not being radiant is a big hit on 'better rewards' but the endo/aura forma/adaptation/rolling guard mods are nice, rest of the rewards are bad though. Quite a few players do endurance runs just for the fun of it, there is a Youtube channel where he runs for 12-16+ hours just because. As for ESO - I don't care for it. Even if DE did something different having the relics be radiant, that isn't enough to do it for me, and truly, there is only one frame that fits ESO - Saryn. So if you don't like Saryn or her playstyle, then ESO isn't for you by association. That's the flawed design DE has adopted, and that same design is what will eventually destroy Warframe. Edit - Also, you can edit your posts.
  2. It is a fact in WoW that not everyone who gets to max level plays Raids or even Heroic Dungeons for that matter. However, despite that fact I don't think that raids or heroic dungeons exclude anyone. If something exists and someone doesn't want to do it, that's their choice/right. Warframe currently doesn't have anything that is actually challenging, nothing that truly tests builds w/ arcanes or full focus school operators, and I'm not asking for something game-breakingly broken like Payday 2 Death Sentence or anything, where you have to cheese the game, only a handful of loadouts work. I want all frames to be able to play what would be higher level challenging content, but in a way that fits that frames playstyle, without alienating other frames or making them useless. However, in order to do that, no only would a power ceiling need to be established, but many frames would need to be updated and have a grounded 'role', meaning as you get into higher level content, teamwork, coordination etc would be needed. Not "squad" .levels of coordination or anything, but bringing frames that compliment each other or bring a useful ability to the squad. So you wouldn't bring Rhino so you could tank the damage, but because his CC/Roar is useful. You wouldn't bring banshee for her AoE but for her extra damage to enemies, etc.
  3. *shrug* I suppose vet isn't the correct term here, but geared player, so I apologize for using the wrong terminology there. However, the point still stands. I assume with that cherry pick and ignoring the rest of what I said, you at least understand what I meant? They completely undermined the grind that PoE/Fortuna added by giving bosses that just crap out the resources, making it so you stay even less in those open worlds (while pretty, have nothing beyond a pretty face, no character actual backstory or anything). leaving only those boss fights (eidolons/orbs) left to do. Yet those open worlds have interesting lore behind them, like gara's final fight, yet we can't actually go over there and see that or learn anymore potential lore from it. Nor can we find out other interesting/intriguing lore from fortuna, many areas that look like a battle happened there, but no info to explain what transpired.
  4. Know why I played raids during my time in wow? I wanted a challenge. I played Greater Rifts in Diablo 3 because I wanted a challenge with equal rewards for said challenge. I play higher tier maps in Path of Exile because I like to push my builds to the limit and I get rewards for my time. In warframe, I can spend any length of time in a mission and get the same rewards as someone who left at the first rotation, while the mission gets harder. They don't need to make new content every few months, I mean hell - Team Fortress 2 hasn't gotten an update in almost TWO YEARS yet players are still religiously playing it. Why is that? Because that repeatable content is rewarding. Warframe's content is situationally rewarding, that 80 endo is nice at first, until you realize you can get 200, 400, 1600 down the line. Those 2500-3500 credit caches are amazing, until you can make 100x that from index for far less work, with a frame/build you can make in your first 2 hours of playing (rhino). And the when you suggest someone, with valid criticisms to go play something else, because you cannot find a reason for it - shows you aren't here for discussion but for blind defense. Warframe has many problems that can be fixed, and they won't be fixed by playing something else. Even Destiny, with all of it's problems, brings in new players while respecting older players, and without alienating them. DE needs to pay attention and take notes from other games that have already gone through these 'phases' and start fixing these problems.
  5. Except the problem with your "spoiler" is much of that listed isn't actually big content, it's fluff it has no real substance. Tusk Thumpers added one new enemy type, singular, One that gives rewards only new players need, but only vet players can kill. PoE Remaster is just a facelift on The Plains of Eidolon, not adding new missions, rewards, or anything else. The Jovian Concord. I'm not going to deny that the new maps don't look nice, or there isn't minute details in things - nor do I mean to insult anyone who worked on it. However, there is very little sustainable content here, once you kill the new boss and get wisp - you're done, no reason to do it again. Once you've done the new disruption game mode and gotten the new resource needed to make the new stuff, you're done. Why is that? No. Actual. Rewards. There isn't an incentive to keep doing that content when there is no actual reward for it. Why do people play Defection? To get harrow, once they've done it, they stay away from it, same with salvage for nidus. Fortuna is the same way, you complete the missions and - you're done. Only a handful of other missions have a reason to continue, but their subjective. If you don't care for cosmetics, no reason to run Exploiter Orb indefinitely to get the Empherema's. The only redeemable feature, is they added mutagen mass, Injectors, Fieldrons (in rotation) with the normal bounties, but in turn gutted invasions, because that was one of the main reasons players did invasions besides weapon parts. While I cannot say for certain with Empyrean - my first impressions seem to not really fit within the rest of the design of Warframe. Very slowly paced, and while I haven't seen any rewards, I don't expect anything actually rewarding, looking at DE's track record (call me a pessimist but the evidence is there). If DE want Warframe to keep vet players entertained too, then they need to get rid of this "complete it then abandon it" mentality. You defeat a boss on the starchart and get the respective frame, you're done with it. There is no reason why players should be leaving or getting burnt out in the manner they are. It's due to DE's warped / flawed design with Warframe and their lack of ingenuity. They keep using the same formula (complete it, abandon it) mentality, they have quite a few different little things that they could easily add and breathe new life into dead parts of warframe. Anyone remember the challenge rooms in the void? How they were a big deal to find when you were a new player, but after MR 8 or so became "meh" because you either had all the rewards (which are worthless for trading for plat) or because you had something better? Focus there, and branch out to other things. In a looter shooter, players mainly play to get better loot and progress, but also want a challenge for that progression, being able to defeat enemies they previously couldn't. However, you can reach that 'level' very quickly, and then end up staying at a 'always defeating whatever you find' stage and that never changes, and those things that can challenge you are far beyond the 'balance scope' of what DE has selected. I've said it before, DE can easily (quite easily) appeal to both casual players (done already, they'll be entertained for at least 1-2 full years at this point if nothing was added for them) and vet players looking for a challenge. Focus on some older content that few play, change it how it needs to be to make it enticing (increase rewards, change loot tables, reward endurance runs, etc) and possibly change how the mission works in general. Start small and think big. I mean, any step towards an endgame or a challenge for vets is the step in the right direction - and anyone paying attention will notice that. Treating older players as just something to spit out to let newer players in isn't a good thing, the revolving door. Especially, when I have more hours in other games that haven't gotten an update in nearly a decade, that still keep me entertained and involved more than Warframe does with less than 1/4th of the time. I love warframe, I love the ideas and potential it has, but it hurts so much that DE would pander to newer players that won't invest nearly as much time, yet leave many of their dedicated fanbase in the dark or behind. You can see how this effects the community, look no further than the Youtubers who post content, so little has been posted in recent months due to there being nothing to do. And the reason why there is nothing, is because of that "complete it, then abandon it" you've gotten the rewards, and the rest of the 'rewards' are just credit caches, low levels of endo or insulting duplicates (common mods that shouldn't be in the droptable, cosmetics that we have x50+ blueprints of etc). So.. DE has some work to do, but saying that it's impossible to play without getting burnt out - that's naive.
  6. Perhaps, but that doesn't need to be the case with Warframe, considering it's a live-service style game. Meaning, if DE puts some effort into new game modes, and actually makes them fun and rewarding, no breaks will be necessary. Exactly. That analogy sadly doesn't work here, playing with those action figures you'd only be limited by your imagination. Can't tell you how many hours of my childhood I spent playing with matchbox cars or outside with sticks and my imagination, the only thing that limited me was.. my imagination. With Warframe, it requires a bit of work, but it isn't something that is impossible or asking DE to find the cure for cancer. It's been plastered all up and down these forums for years, and they just refuse to acknowledge it. E.N.D.G.A.M.E. C.H.A.L.L.E.N.G.E. R.E.W.A.R.D.S. These are what most vet players want, something that will challenge their new 'endgame' gear (arcanes, decked out warframes etc. and looking cool while doing so) and getting rewarded for their time/effort/investment of learning the game and creating a min/maxed build. Instead, there is no reward for that effort, and no challenge. And before you say it, no, removing mods and tying an arm around your back isn't 'challenge', especially not in a looter-shooter. Borderlands even challenges you when you get gear, even when in a party and players have designated roles. There is no reason why we can haven't one or two games modes that do this. I've said it before, star chart ~50 is ez street, this is your power fantasy playground, it would be exactly the same as we have now. 60-100 would be challenge territory, gradually getting harder and requiring teamwork, rewarding experience and "proper" builds. Then 105-125 would be "raid" territory, where gear is pushed to the absolute limits and 'skill/ability' is required, or at least the ability to memorize things. Similarly to how raids work in WoW, normal quests (start chart), dungeons (sortie), raids (... raids). DE has the foundations here to do so, without shaking up Warframe and making everyone mad. I just find it disappointing they alienate those that want a challenge, and those that don't want that challenge attack those that do - giving non-answers (remove mods, play something else, take a break) as a way to "fix" something DE should've treated a long time ago. Edit: The dumbing down of Warframe and making it easier is just further pushing away vet players that want more, and catering to those that won't stay here nearly as long for some cheap entertainment, when they could go much further and bring a better experience for everyone involved. New and old, challenge and casual players alike Quality > Quantity.
  7. Exactly. Not to mention if they focus on game modes and have them scale correctly (difficulty, rewards) then we could have something 'simple' entertain many times for hundreds or thousands of runs if done correctly. I mean, look at kuva survival/siphons/floods. Now imagine those with .. actually fun mission types - then they might have something (hey, not everyone likes survival). Sustainable content could work in Warframe, it would just need to be executed well enough by DE. A big factor for it work is that it would need to have replay value so players aren’t able to be burnt out on it insanely fast as the rest of the game. Meaning that it has to have good enough rewards for players to actually have an incentive to do said content and would also have to be unique so players aren’t bored out of their minds of the same thing over and over. Yup.
  8. Complaining just because you don't like it doesn't help anyone. Giving constructive criticism/feedback is what benefits everyone, it shows where you stand, what you want, and how the developers can possibly 'fix' the issue at hand. When you just say "I don't want it" it's no easier to discern what you want than a toddler screaming, you have to actually say what you don't like / what they need to fix / give suggestions. Personally, I think it's fine - I like that it's an attachment+syndana, gives me hope for even more flexibility customization wise with cosmetics. My main complaint is that is kind of clips with Nidus' Myxini helm in it's mutated form, other than upping the res a little - I don't see an issue.
  9. AFK guy is host, everyone has a 75% chance of 'losing' along with him and getting disconnected. Not sure how many here have played it, but Payday 2 has what you're asking for @Goit same Peer to Peer and vote kick system. Issue is, it's abused - and pretty badly. Someone gets accused for cheating because they're teleporting (turns out it's a bad connection but kicker doesn't know that) so poor guy gets kicked. You're playing I frame host doesn't like or doesn't think is meta enough, bye bye. Or you join a troll that kicks everyone before leaving himself, had that happen in Payday 2 a few times... Heart is in the right place, but there is no 'answer' here, there is no fix. The only band-aid fix that exists that has an impact is simply, abandon that person. Extract if you can solo, or report them (I hear DE takes them seriously), then move on. It sucks, but it's all we got right now.
  10. I think the main thing that needs looked at for nyx is her 4, keep her augment the same for those who like her 4 as it is now. Then redesign her 4 to be a completely new ability. Her 3 should give nyx damage reduction (up to 85-90% like nova's 1) for each enemy that she has MC'd recently with a duration buff after casting it, base time would be 25-30s, 9% of DR per enemy up to 90%. Her main issue is she's too squishy for higher level content, and you can do a hybrid build with augments to make her 2 completely strip armor and her 3 still be useful w/ range. The issue is even with adaptation and TWO arcane guardians she still dies to level 80s (not even triple digit enemies) within 2-3 shots. Give her some DR and she'd be good to go. Then like I said before, DE would have wiggle room now to make her 4 something completely different, it's clunky and doesn't match the rest of her kit very kill. Those that like it can keep it with her augment. Edit: Just remembered, I'd also remake her 1, it would be a drain buff that would increase damage of ALL MC'd enemies (with her 3) by 500%. So if you want them to kill things you have that as an option.
  11. I think a great way of 'fixing' invasions (since the only unique thing about them right now is the weapons/keys) is to integrate them with Empyrean. I can see massive space battles that you start with in the plains, go up to space, fight up there, then 'infiltrate' a massive ship (like when you fight ambulas, that big thing). When fortuna was added and the Fieldron/Injector/Mutagen Mass were added the only thing left is weapon parts/ mesa alad v keys. Not sure what they could add for loot to help bring players in again, but it needs something. Not to mention syndicates could also get involved with it as others have mentioned here. Also like Oggyswe + Tomplexthis ideas.
  12. Warframe already had a system like that, where you were limited on how many times you could revive and had to pay plat to get more revives (or wait until they reset). That isn't a good idea .
  13. 1. I'd be fine with this for some units, might make those melee units actually threatening. 2. Fine 3. Depending on how it's handled fine, otherwise if it's a tanky enemy might be there longer than necessary (so squish enemies hide and tanky ones don't). 4. Teamwork, in warframe? I like the idea, not sure if it would work though. 5. 50/50 - I get the idea, but I don't like how much scaling damage they do. 6. Only if I can shoot the weapon from them effectively disabling it and they go melee (like loki disarm). 7. Depending how it's handled sure, I think one of the main reasons why accuracy is lacking is to give the feeling that you're dodging gunfire, aka - a badass trope. 8. Maybe in higher level stuff (those one or two game modes that would actually need teamwork I keep talking about). But not for general play, that would just be annoying. I think it would be neat if we had that slower pace that 'used to exist' for Warframe when it first started. Then DE could be creative and have wombo-combo duo frame abilities that create a super ability. That would be really cool. Zephyr + hydroid for deadly waterspouts that rain loot, or octavia + hydroid for a fun "slow effect" (water droplets floating mid-air and falling/rising slowly) slowing the enemy/killing them. Many different fun combos could be had depending on augments and abilities. Then if it's received well possibly added to the rest of the game (it would be exclusive to this game-type for its initial addition). *shrug* I think if Warframe is going to be in it's current state they need to stop advertising it as a teamwork game. Every trailer with more than one frame in it has them working together for a goal, when in reality that isn't necessary. Hell, in interception/defense players are running around to kill stuff because they already killed everything in their 'sector'. And for those of us advocating for a balance change, why not add a new game type (or revamp/facelift an old one) and experiment with balance there? Then when you find an acceptable amount, do a vote, see what players like/dislike and go from there. It's a bit cheesy (vote system etc) but you'd get more responses.
  14. You would still have that power fantasy though. Want to mow thousands of enemies down or open relics etc? There's your fantasy. Get past a point (but not 3+ hours for endurance folk), in this case level 60-70 range (again, scaling would be changed so you can have your power fantasy), and enemies get a bit harder and you need to plan ahead etc. This also opens up for effects that've had no purpose to get some much needed updates, like status duration/max ammo etc. Basically, level 50 and below is ez street as most of the game is now, including sorties. Past level 60 is where abilities start to wane in power (they'll be useful, but won't be as dominant as they are/were on lower levels). Now you'll need good weapons as well, and with rivens being repurposed for utility rather than stack sticks, more weapons can actually be buffed to be useful on their own without the need for 300%+ damage/multishot rivens. Meaning more flexibility when modding the weapons.
  15. My apologies I read your initial post wrong, I thought you were defending the current system. It is a slipper slope, there is no 'quick fix' here, because any one solution can breed new problems. We went from players not being rewarded to now kill stealing is more profitable. I think damage done would be the 'fairest of them all' but I don't know - I don't have an eight ball. Well enemies kill us fast because we have the power to instantly kill them. When you get power creep like we have the only balance checks is invincibility phases (like almost all bosses have), and high burst damage, which most enemies have past level 50. When we get to sortie territory and beyond 60+ is when you see power creep go up to 11, because of the damage they can put out, but we can still kill them past level 9000.
×
×
  • Create New...