Xikto Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Dark dagger stance polarity is UNAIRU polarity and guess what! there is no dagger stance with that polarity so basically you 100% HAVE TO forma it. can we fix this please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katinka Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 It is crazy and really should have been changed a long time ago but... most people won't Forma a Dark Dagger since the Rakta Dark Dagger exists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nslay Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 1 hour ago, Katinka said: It is crazy and really should have been changed a long time ago but... most people won't Forma a Dark Dagger since the Rakta Dark Dagger exists. Yeah basically this. Maybe DE is trying to tell players to wait for Rakta Dark Dagger... it's so much better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xikto Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 18 hours ago, nslay said: Yeah basically this. Maybe DE is trying to tell players to wait for Rakta Dark Dagger... it's so much better! A) not everyone has access to syndicate weapons and specially for people that have other syndicates and are not into trading B) it is a horrible idea to give weapons a negative like wrong stance polarity even if we don't wanna use it because while leveling it makes it more annoying C) different riven dispositions in different variants makes all variants worth something D) If DE wanted to make a forma part of weapon they could simply make it craft requirement so no matter how we look at it, that is horrible logic and game design. also this is why i don't like forums, people coming here and not just don't see the point, but also make it harder for DE to see and take notes, because guess what people decide to argue even if it is an obvious mistake on their part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.