Jump to content

kuciol

PC Member
  • Posts

    819
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kuciol

  1. 38 minutes ago, DeathDweller said:

    @Padre_Akais @SneakyErvin I don't know if it's the english language that is poor on definitions or you guys are just stubborn and fail to grasp that having an advantage "over" others doesn't translate to direct competition between individuals.It describes your higher chances, position etc in "comparison" to someone else.Check this thread alone and see how many people can't even agree on what WF is, pay for convinience, pay to win faster, pay to advance faster, pay to not farm, pay to skip, literally you can keep coming up with a different term every other hour.The reason all those terms aren't established through the years is because they all fall under the P2W category which by itself can refer to the game itself or an opponent.P2W mechanics/elements don't make a game P2W.I've played enough online games some with heavy P2W  some with P2W elements, most of them had grinding skipping etc, none of the communities kept baptizing them as they pleased.At least gather a group, deside what it is, tell DE to name it us such and be over with it.

    Its all of the above. Its not P2W since there really is nothing to win. You are not competing with anyone, you are not comparing yourself to anyone. There is nothing to gain. You literally just rip yourself off of gameplay. P2W definition got diluted because entitled kids cant comprehend that they dont deserve everything by just breathing. P2W means you have an edge by paying but what edge you gain here? Players that dont spend a dime can have exactly the same thing as the biggest whale. Thats not P2W by any stretch of imagination. It would be IF and only IF the grind would be unreasonable but it isnt, check any Aeria Games game to learn the meaning ot this word after you spend 5 months to just buy a single item. 

    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Uhkretor said:

    Only Gauss is interesting for this one, it seems...

    ... Guess what? Mastery Rank says you're wrong and that you're going to get it anyway, but fate will dictate that you'll love throwing them mobs into space for lulz...

    Yea sure i will get him, but he will most likely be dust collector next to Vauban. Im more interested in his weapons. Maybe if his 1 was toggle i might be more interested but as of now i dont see a single reason to pick him over other frames. 

  3. Just now, JackHargreav said:

    Every ability ever is just a version of an other existing ability. I mean what do you want? What kind of abilities would be groundbraking in your opinion? 

    And yes. Ppl will complain. But when did they not complain? DE just sneezes and bunch of ppl write posts about the devs being jerks. Ppl were complaining about wisp being too OP ffs. And you complain even before the frame came out.

    Well Grendel has like almost all new abilities, only his 4 is somewhat like hydroids 3. And i do not complain, at all, i dont care about him because he is not interesting, im just stating how the future will look like because people are overhyping themselves.

  4. 4 minutes ago, JackHargreav said:

    You mean the very thing you just did in your comment? 

    Basically that's what you're doing here.

    No, i expect him to be trash, therefore if he will be ok i will be pleasantly surprised, other expect him to be op and when he turns out to be even OK they will be disappointed. Besides his skill set is bunch of stolen and made worse abilities .

  5. 7 minutes ago, (PS4)Ozymandias-13- said:

    City of Titans (new mmo coming out) will be similar. Almost everything you can buy in the market can be earned in game. For example, if you like a costume set a certain enemy is wearing, killing that enemy maybe 300 times unlocks it for your character. Or to save time, just buy from the market and unlock (I believe) for all characters on your account.

    It will be Freemium B2P, thats what their FAQ says anyway.

  6. 3 hours ago, (PS4)sweatshawp said:

    When I get off work I’ll make a video and link you to show you now little effort it is for limbo to nuke along with equinox m8 !

    Yea sure you can but they still need to press buttons to do it, Ember doesnt. Unless you have like earth or Venus lvl enemies in mind but ember could do that on akkad and hydron so nerf was justified. I would actually make every single ability in game constricted by walls, that would solve whole map nuking issue while still keeping room nuking.

  7. 5 minutes ago, TheRealShade said:

    I wish we had proper challenge, some really good and enjoyable boss fights that are worth repeating. I can't remember the last time I failed a mission because I had my ass handed to me.

    This game suffers a very hard Dark Souls syndrome, once you know what to do it will never again be challenging, also you need to remember that most players cant solo Teralyst, just something to think about. 

  8. 1 hour ago, (PS4)Hopper_Orouk said:

    So, are you satisfied?

    Yes.

    1 hour ago, (PS4)Hopper_Orouk said:

    Are you satisfied for getting frequent and constant release of cosmetics, skins, deluxe skins? While getting constant delays for more hyped content that otherwise turn out to be average?

    Yes. 1. They need to make money somehow or would you prefer them going full EA?, 2. Cosmetics are made by different people then rest of the game you know?, 3. Stop overhyping yourself and have unrealistic expectations, they always deliver what they promise. Also they never gave any date, sometimes they just mention "we hope to ship this in XYZ" so it cant be delayed if it didnt have any deadline in the first place.

    1 hour ago, (PS4)Hopper_Orouk said:

    Are you satisfied for getting recycled content without new exciting content like events that balances the game's content drought?

    Yes because thats how making games work, there isnt a single game in existence that doesnt suffer from content droughts. Making events would only postpone more meaningful content. Dogs day was very simple event and i bet that alone took like a month to make. Its just isnt that simple.

    1 hour ago, (PS4)Hopper_Orouk said:

    Are you satisfied for getting yearly(sometimes more) short lived quests or expansions that end in a few hours?

    Yes because its not story driven game, quests are just nice additions.

    1 hour ago, (PS4)Hopper_Orouk said:

    Are you satisfied for the lack of communication between the devs(i've played other games and the devs there were more talkative and reply with detailed and lengthened texts providing feedback to our feedback)

    They listen to feedback and are happy to answer questions. The fact that they dont take your particular route doesnt mean they dont listen. They just prefer more casual approach to their game then you would like. BTW most feedback is just people crying what they want, when i asked some questions about issues with what they want they instead of answering just kept repeating what they want. Thats how most feedback looks "me want, bad DE , just give". This is casual game, stop expecting them to do 180 and make something hardcore. It wont happen, you are just setting yourself up for disappointment.

    1 hour ago, (PS4)Hopper_Orouk said:

    Are you satisfied with some updates or overhauls/changes not getting a second look even if players stated their dissatisfaction for said changes

    Yes because 1. Changes take time, 2. The fact that they dont change things at all may suggest thet THEY are happy how it turned out, 3. You dont have access to any meaningful data like they do so you have no way of knowing if majority dislikes something, forums is place were most people are dissatisfied with something and thats the reason why they came here in the first place, you cant base reception on forums really.

    • Like 1
  9. 31 minutes ago, 40PE said:

    Except this one. Because exceptions strengthen the rule. 😛

    Nah no exceptions in this rule. Its a lot like driving. First you are excited because you finally got your license but after 5 years you drive because you have to and are used to it, you can buy new car and get excited again but you will get over it after a month because in the end its the same sh.it. The same with games. No amount of content and patches will solve that issue. You will only faster and faster get bored of new things. Just look at Path of Exile, the most random game with clear endgame, with random rewards, basically endless possibilities and big content patches every 3 months with total resets of characters and people still complain.

  10. 5 hours ago, Zilchy said:

    Well it's the kind of game releasing more content wanting us to come back, so no. If you build that kind of game you should be creating new interesting game modes but then also adding longevity to them which is what DE always fails to do. They just instead concentrate on money ie cosmetics.

    No game is meant to be played forever. Just by being here you defeated your own point. Clearly the game has longevity. 

  11. 11 hours ago, Renginus said:

    That is content but its not good bcs every other gamemode will be still the same grindy repetetive and boring

    They need to start upgrading things more than doing new

    But that will also be gradually changed , not all at once so before they finish the "newer" things will already be stale and old and you have never ending cycle. 

    11 hours ago, Renginus said:

    Look at enemy ai enemyies all the time just pick up weapon and shoot 0 tactics

    As much as i im not oppossed to this idea i dont think its reasonable to even try. Mobs will either die in 1 hit so improvements will be pointless or they will just get annoying to deal with.

  12. 2 hours ago, Zilchy said:

    Checking your profile suggests otherwise. When you reach 2500+ hours and beyond, the game gets a bit stale.

    And dont you think thats enough? Hell 1k is achievement if you ask me (not even there yet lol). When i read something like this i can go only "WTF did you expect? eternity? 

  13. In my opinion they should just make every single ability in game be limited by walls. That alone would solve most issues. No more whole map nuking but you still keep room nuking and you do not F..k over less powerfull frames that also happen to use nuking abilities like Mag for example. Hey and Ember wont feel so bad compared to others. 

  14. I have kinda idea what could be not bad reward from them. Make Kuva in Kuva fortress one , make this Echos in Lua ones but on the others give us relics, all relics that ever existed vaulted and non vaulted. The drop table will be diluted AF but you will have a chance for those vaulted primes. Vets wont be as satisfied with it but they always can go for Kuva or try to farm some plat if they feel like it. The problem is if somebody has everything there wont be a good singular reward for him and somebody that doesnt. The difference between top end players and even middle is just to big.

     

    Edit: On second thought that may be good rewards for players but problematic for DE, unvaulting is a thing after all and thats not small influx of cash.

  15. 19 minutes ago, Loza03 said:

    People are asking for more breadcrumbs to go play disruption specifically, which indicates that they like disruption. Disruption is one of the least automatable gamemodes. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that people quite like that and want to play it (and logically, things like it) more.

    You know what puts the biggest hole in your thought? The fact that the most braindead solutions are the meta, always and in every game. You know why disruption became popular? Because its just mix between survival and defense but faster then both. The speed at which you get things done is the biggest factor why people choose one thing over the other. It is like that because lets face it gamers are just lazy, thats why we play games instead of being productive in the first place. 

  16. 1 minute ago, DeathDweller said:

    Yeah that's why i put publisher in " ".It's financial mostly but still when you are financialy supported you stop being independent.

    But they are not financially supported and they dont have a publisher. Or do you have any proof that they do? As far as we can tell they got bought to take some profit out of them not to financially support or interfere.

    • Like 1
  17. 3 minutes ago, DeathDweller said:

    Yeah i see that, 3/4 of your time on WF you claim you were away and now you spend your whole day on the forums like us crying whiners.

    I have 930 hours played over 309 days, i would say that pretty good average. Now i do other things and have forums on the other tab simple. You are crying whiners since you cant even answer some basic questions. Talking with all of you was like talking with spoiled toddler. You tell me what you want , i ask you about actual problems with what you want and you just repeat the first part, ALL THE FKN TIME. You have nothing else to say beyond "me want that","game needs it","game is dieing" . When presented with actual problem you just ignore them and resort to insults. Keep believing that you know better, that will take you very far, hopefully far away from this game.

×
×
  • Create New...