Jump to content

MPonder

PC Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,288

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by MPonder

    Riven disposition changes based on popularity is wrong

    in General Discussion

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    6 minutes ago, .Unforgotten. said:

    How about this as an option, where both Non-Riven users and Riven users can finally have peace and DE can stop the Ban/Nerf Hammer as well?

    I'd be fine with that, even with 0.95 dispo.

    And they could fix other weapons maybe? How about come to the forums and ask "Hey, why you guys use Rubico so much", then we can come with stuff like:

    - Because Lanka is horrible to use and it is bugged for eidolon hunt since probably Thumpers were introduced.

    - Causa Vulkar Wraith has 3 sec reload and a trash fire rate, dependent of rivens too.

    - Vectis is OK to use actually, rivens are still kind necessary for it though. the rest is kind  trash cause of Fire rate/base damage/reload is bad and maybe need rivens to not be dependent of Other Warframe buffs.

    Riven disposition changes based on popularity is wrong

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Warframe does sell power, lol.

    -What you use to make your Weapons and Warframes stronger? Formas/Potatoes, can't you buy that in the shop?

    -What is the currency used for trading? PL, can you buy PL?

    -Some Warframes are stronger than others, some are better than others for a specific mission, can you buy them? Same for weapons, can you buy them? Yep, directly and indirectly with $ -> PL -> Trade.

    -----------------

    Warframe has 3 big lies.

    1- Warframe is a coop game -> It is not, cause there is no coop content.

    2- DE don't sell power -> They do.

    3- Community is nice -> They aren't. it seems that way because there is no coop, a little coop and you see how things are.

     

    Profit Taker immune to explosions?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    I dunno how it works, but depends on the weapon. Opticor has Magnetic damage on the explosion, but when I tested, it was doing no damage on when shield was magnetic. I tested one Kuva weapon that had inate corrosive on it, forgot the name, the corrosive part did xit or no damage at all if I remember. You just have to look for other weapon.


    Exodia contagion does blast damage and it works on Profit-taker.

    DE's New vs. Reworked Content Dilemma

    in General Discussion

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    19 hours ago, HelmetTooTight said:

    Rebb literally say why they release unbaked content: players will leave in times of content drought. Warframe as a F2P game needs new content to bring in new players as well as retain veterans.

    Then let the content abondoned full of bugs for years, I'm still been unable to use melee sometimes on Profit-taker and just dying fix it. Eidolons, jesus, I can't even count how many bugs it has for months, maybe years.

    Retain veterans by reiterating star chart missions, Genius.

    19 hours ago, HelmetTooTight said:

    But I doubt that'll stop them from pushing ahead with new content releases.

    I doubt that they will not do xit things like Lich again.

    "Pushing ahead", plz. Lich were a "retard test" for community, DE saw how community is by defending any xit content they release and tried to "push" beyong that retardness with all that RNG and Grind, no way they didn't knew how bad that xit was/is.

    19 hours ago, HelmetTooTight said:

    Major overhauls should simply be branded as new content so it gets coverage. And the truth is, if done correctly, the reworked content WILL be new content.

    Everything is star ... chart ... missions. Even invasions. what DE change on other "content" of Warframe is that they change enemies Lvls, change rewards and put one or two new units there, BOOM, content!

     

    • Like 1

    Riven disposition changes based on popularity is wrong

    in General Discussion

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    9 minutes ago, SneakyErvin said:

    But you didnt win over anything that lost because you spent money. So not pay to win.

    I didn't spend money, we complained in the forum and they finally did the change on the loot after some time. We won the next endgame gear that was much better than the older that would be impossible without those itens.

    • Like 1

    Riven disposition changes based on popularity is wrong

    in General Discussion

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    21 minutes ago, SneakyErvin said:

     on cash-shop exclusiveness 

    One time, I was playing a MMO that there was a item that you "could" get by playing the game. On the content it was released, it had a resource that required 1000 of it to build the item. 5 months after playing said content, I had around 250 of that resource while playing around 10hours per day. You could equip 3 of this item by the way.

    Or you could simple cash shop for it. Exclusiveness means nothing too.

    • Like 1

    Should all warframes have built in energy regen?

    in General Discussion

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    11 minutes ago, SpicyDinosaur said:

     

    You are missing something, you forgot to remove the rest of the mods and just test with max streamline and fleeting. If you put  Transient fortude, it is gonna #*!%-up the drain with max+fleeting, because your duration will go lower. If you use duration mods, you can use not maxed fleeting depending on how much duration.

     

    Test it with just stream line and fleeting on the build, and nothing else.

     

    Should all warframes have built in energy regen?

    in General Discussion

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    3 minutes ago, SpicyDinosaur said:

    Okay so it says this in support of what you were saying:

     

    "In the case of Ability Duration under 100%, Ability Efficiency above 175% is also taken into account, even though not depicted in the Upgrade-Menu. The final drain still cannot go below 25% of its base value. (See the graph on the right for examples.)"

     

    But I'm not sure how much it continues to affect things and the value. I can actually get that table up from Genesis on my server

    Dude, all you have to do in grab a Warframe that has a channeling ability, check it cost at 100% effficiency, put max stream and fleet, and see that it drain cost will go to 25% of what it was. But you gonna lose duration for other abilities if it is important.

    Should all warframes have built in energy regen?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    1 minute ago, SpicyDinosaur said:

    okay, explain in more detail. The stat is 175% and doesn't go over regardless. Unless you have some sort of proof of your claim. I ponied up my proof, so show me how channeling abilities can be impacted beyond the 175% efficiency you can get from the mods by just... going over the cap.

    There is a formula for channeling abilities on this page. It involves efficiency and duration

    https://warframe.fandom.com/wiki/Ability_Efficiency

    Should all warframes have built in energy regen?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Just now, SpicyDinosaur said:

    okay, explain in more detail. The stat is 175% and doesn't go over regardless. Unless you have some sort of proof of your claim. I ponied up my proof, so show me how channeling abilities can be impacted beyond the 175% efficiency you can get from the mods by just... going over the cap.

    Try it on a Warframe that has Channeling abilities and check the cost.

    Riven disposition changes based on popularity is wrong

    in General Discussion

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    You Guys definitions about P2W are horrible, P2W can occur easily in PvE games with 0 competition (Not saying Warframe is). Imagine an endgame that there is no way to beat it without having the best of the best, and there are like just 10 people in the whole server that has this "best of the best" because it is so RARE and because of this, it is pretty phucking expensive, that only Cashers that buy and sell cashshop stuff will be able to afford it (or bid for it). Then you have a content that drop the endgame gear that most of the server can't finish, the only chance for getting the itens is to pay for carries for these few 10 players that will just become more rich. An extreme example. If you can't progress your char because it is so difficult without cashing, it is a p2w game, there is nothing to do with competition.

    Cash shop selling power doesn't mean P2W if you can get the item in game pretty fast without requiring you to nolife in the game.

    • Like 4

    Great job on Scarlet Spear DE

    in General

    Posted · Edited by MPonder

    Weird, this topic is not poping up on GD for me.

    6 hours ago, (PS4)Viveeeh said:

    You can criticise DE all the way you want. Why not? After all, Scarlet Spear is really not that creative, as someone else said about, it's basically a glorified mobile defence. But why telling people off because they are having fun? They're obviously more casual than yourself, but why is that a problem? Let me help, it's not. Don't try to ruin someone else's mood just because they're having fun with something you don't.

    Kind yes actually. Not about the "having fun" part. But about praising a xit Event, you see, DE is getting away by just adding StarChart repetition missions with grind+rewards done in a horrible way for a lot of time. And a lot of this, it is because community praise DE so hard for every xit they do. Thank god it is finally changing.

    When you come to GD, and post on GD, expect people to not agree with you or accept what you say, simple as that.

×
×
  • Create New...