Jump to content

Carnage2K4

PC Member
  • Posts

    1,815
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Carnage2K4

  1. I gotta say that after playing this game for almost 2 months, interactions with randoms has been mostly positive, Best one I remember was in a T.IV survival with 3 randoms from an alert, after an hour it was getting hectic and we decided to head to extraction, however one guy got left behind and went down, he said "leave me" in chat, but all 3 of us raced back, Loki stripped the enemy weapons and got right onto resing him with a half second to go, I landed in the middle at about the same time, roared and stomped, the other guy, an ember started setting guys on fire as they all lifted off, floating in the air and we started clearing out the horde in some awesome melee synergy like a well oiled destruction machine, hard to express how epic that moment was, going from completely overwhelmed to burning flying body parts in an instant with all of our ultimates getting used together. Got to extraction and he said again he could have just used affinity, but one guy said "NO TENNO LEFT BEHIND", and I've never seen them again, fun times, one of those good gaming moments that don't really happen with random players.

  2. 1 hour ago, magusat999 said:

    Funny - stuff...

    Yeah, actually it is your interpretation, everything is an interpretation, some are just more relevant than others. You must have reading issues, Because I acknowledged they were not 'made up' by you and that they were 'official'... You need to try and pay a little more attention when you read things, try taking one word at a time, because currently you're arguing against your own apparent illiteracy... and it looks a little silly I must say, especially coupled with you're very inept understanding of the English language in the inferences of the language that can be derived.

    So just for the record, and read this slowly now; yes DE have said that it is based on the concept of a paladin, not disagreeing, okay; not disagreeing I know you seem to think I am, but I'm not, and have not this entire time... So would you like to stop trying to make out like that argument exists, I mentioned you arguing against yourself and you're still doing it...

    I keep responding because you're interpretation is not the only one... just that yours seems to be based on a fictional representation of a Disney character... not they mythology, we're attempting to get that past your wall of ignorance, but you seem to be to illiterate to even understand the concept to any degree...

    I don't care about your 'position' I'm just saying that it's devoid of an open minded representation (like that many concepts can go into a new idea), ignorant of facts (like the real history of fairies) and delusional to some extent (like out right ignoring the spriggan skin, even after it's mention twice by me alone, you still act like it does not exist, and the fact that Oberon )...

    So, if you bother to say anything in retort, 1st answer me this; Does the Fayarch exists for Oberon and is 'Fay' middle English for "Fairy" and 'Arch' Greek for "King"?

    Fayarch literally means Fairy King you child, complete with Dryad/Spriggan and bloody butterfly wings... There is clearly a fairy influence, you have to be delusional not to see it.

     

     

  3. 2 hours ago, magusat999 said:

    First: Your logic is faulty. It is the WIKI statement, fiirst - not MINE (I didn't make that up).

    *Rest of pointless rant*

     

    I'm aware it's the wiki post thanks. I'm commenting on your interpretation of the English used and the implicitly of it, not denying that it's there... It's not 'faulty logic', you need to stop making insinuations of such a type, you seem to be super defensive to the point of verging on hyperbole, red herrings and ad hominem all of which are fallacies... All of which is somewhat ironic and hypocritical after your post about others doing such things...

    Your point about being zealous is also the same as your use of 'paladin' both are uses to confer a meaning, an 'archetype' of the term, not suggesting that Oberon is an 8th century French Christian under the rule of the King Charlemagne... I mean what are you even talking about? This is what your literal interpretation seems to imply, because that's what a 'zealot paladin' would be... He's not "a zealot', he 'is zealous'... He's not 'a paladin' he is 'the paladin (in reference)'... Those are some distinctions of English usage you seem to be ignoring, your interpretation and the implication of the sentences are 2 different things.

    I don't see why you're so anti-fairy, you make references and insinuations of tinkerbell, pink Disney stuff and my little pony... I fail to see why you have been brainwashed into thinking that's what a fairy is, because it's really not, I would have hoped your subscription to club penguin would have expired by now... 

    I'm also not saying that Paladins and Zealots are not part of the creation, at no point did I suggest that, I even agreed that the character type they suggest has gone into it, so when you ask "how do you ignore that"... What the hell are you even talking about??? At no point was it ignored, you appear to be on such an anti-fairy rant equating a Disney produced ideology of fairies to what everyone else is saying, that you actually ignore what is being said and creating your own fantasy argument to argue with yourself...  Strange behaviour...

    Given the name and obvious skin reference to Spriggans (I like how you completely ignore that the fayarch skin exists BTW) I would say that there has been at least some fairly influence, as well as the paladin and zealot you so virulently defend for no good reason... It's DEs creation they can add any mix of mythical and history ideology they want, and given all the bits that are they, it seems likely that have mixed many ingredients to make the frame theme.

    What's sad is you yelling 'NO!' As loud as you can because of some perception you have, that is ignorant and/or delusional of the wealth of mythology that is actually being applied in the game...



     

  4. 9 hours ago, magusat999 said:

    FROM THE WIKI:

    Have you EVER been to the WIki??? BTW. And dont call people derogatory names. Thiis a discussion, not a school yard name calling session.

    http://warframe.wikia.com/wiki/Oberon

    " Oberon is a paladin among Warframes. Zealous offensive powers and sacred protective skills make him a balanced warrior with both assault and supportive capabilities. Oberon came to light inUpdate 11.5."

    Did you miss the word PALADIN? Read it again. Oberon is a PALADIN, not a fairy, king of fairies or wearer of pink under-tighties. I already knew this because I observed the whole design process - you probably didn't even know Warframe existed at the time.

    I think you owe me an apology, because clearly I am not the "dolt" if I am correct.

    Sorry but your statement makes little sense, you imply the specificity of 'paladin' (that would mean he is a warrior of Charlemanges court...) The insert states a 'paladin among Warframes' the implication of this type of wording is not to say Oberon is a paladin, but that he possesses paladin like qualities. In essence a Warrior of Valour that fights against the hordes of the enemy...

     

    He is a fairy, look at the Feyarch skin, it's obviously a spriggan, which is a class of Fairy.

  5. Has anyone mentioned 'Lepidoptera'?
    Lepidoptera is the Taxonomic Order to which Butterflies and Moths belong to.

    Also 'Morphinae' is a subfamily of butterfly that kinda fits with the changing in size thing...

    'Aos Si' is an Irish name for ancient fairy folk, and I think sounds strange enough to be a Warframe.

     

    I know 'Titania' is Shakespeare's Queen of faeries, and appears to be popular, but I personally think it sounds bland as hell...

  6. So I'm relatively new to WF, and while there is a lot to learn (I still have only a vague idea about alliances for example) there is one thing that stuck out to me as being such a simple thing yet not only is there no in game info (that I can see), but what can be found just has no system...

    I'm talking about Stances and their weapons...

    The best example I've seen so far is the Kama:

    • What it looks like: A Scythe
    • What it's name means: a sickle (basically a small Scythe)
    • What it's description says: A Hatchet (a type of Axe)
    • It's stance type: A Machete
    • Duel stance type: Duel Swords

    ... WTF there is no constancy... It's to the point where the Wiki is a must use site just to find out what weapon goes with a stance. And the obvious fix is to have a stance category in it's description and/or stat info... I mean that would fix all the confusion I had, If your going to put down Platinum or Resources towards a weapon type you have a stance for or vice-versa it really should be really clear as to what works with what. Especially if what a weapon looks like has nothing to do with it's type.

     

    I know it's small but it's such a simple thing, yet to a new player it's just... WTF In the end I just had to fork out for an Anku (a weapon that look like an Axe but is a Scythe) after buying a Kama just so I could try out my first stance mod (Reaping Spiral) I mean I should not have to alt-tab out or use the steam browser just to look up the details of a weapon, but that's what has to happen on every purchase now, it's more than a little silly.

×
×
  • Create New...