Jump to content

BlutAdler

PC Member
  • Posts

    713
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BlutAdler

  1. The issue is the augment now boosts your overshields (where previously it was an actual shield), which has multiple sources in the game...so you could gain, and lose, your bubble while still having overshields on your characters which would be visually inconsistent.  Instead I added a bit of flair to the casting effect if you have the augment installed.

     

    (This change was made well before this topic popped up btw, and as always, I'm open to feedback)

     

     

    Ahh okay. It's sad to see the bubble go, you know? It adds to this illusion of extra safety.

  2. See I dont get comments like this.

    What is your motivation of typing that?

     

    If you dont have the issue that he is having, fine, but why are you seemingly opposed to the idea?

    Are you afraid DE's precious resources a better spend on things you find problematic and you dont want that time squandered on this?

     

    To answer your question though: Every time it happens is one too many.

     

    I think he just wants to know how often you overreact like this over the stupid things people do enough to make you ask for a blacklist feature. For what? Just ignore them..

  3. This is exactly my issue when it comes to Warframe and how changes get implemented. A small fraction of the population complains about something, and it drastically gets changes barring any other feelings towards it. What if people like the bubble? I like the bubble.. can I keep it? LIke wth man. 

  4. You know what he means, you just want to try and dismiss/discredit the rest of his argument without having to argue against it...

     

    Yes, I'm trying to dismiss and challenge his argument. And I keep bringing up the fact that OP raised a "concern" about something that was mentioned in a sentence or two. He has no full understanding of how it works or even exactly what will be offered. Yet he'd like to raise concern and claim that DE is trying to lock him into participating in something he previously had no interest in participating in; in this context: cosmetics. 

     

    And what I keep challenging is:

     

    1. OP is asking for an alternative and change because he doesn't want to wear cosmetics - Entitlement

     

    2.OP/People claiming that DE is forcing them into a position he doesn't want to be in, which in any way shape or form. Saying you're "forced" to do something means you're claiming you're forced to do something. And that's not the case.

     

    3. It was speculated that this item will be available to use on your default helmet. Why has nobody who's going on and complaining about this feature responded to that yet? Because people just want to complain about stuff for the sake of complaining.

  5. You don't seem to understand why "forced" is being used in this context. It's not because players are literally being forced to do an action. This is a video game, obviously nobody is forcing you to play it. It is being used because this particular mechanic attaches something the player wants to something that they do not enjoy which effectively "forces" them to do something that they don't enjoy to get something that they want.

     

    And while some could argue that the player should simply ignore the thing that they want because they don't need it, I'd have to say I don't agree. This is a video game. The whole reason it exists is to provide enjoyment. Additional features are supposed to facilitate that purpose not run against it. The customization aspect of combat is one of the core reasons that some people enjoy the game in the first place. Putting too many barriers in front of new customization aspects is effectively wasted content because these players will never enjoy them.

     

    So, it makes sense that OP would provide some feedback to push back against this decision. It may not affect everyone. But players like him that value visual aesthetics to a greater degree will have their enjoyment hindered by this change one way or another. They can choose to either sacrifice customization options and combat effectiveness or run characters that they find visually unappealing. It's a lose lose situation.

     

    I'm sorry? What other way is there to understand "force" in whatever context it is being used? I don't think you quite understand to be honest. If you come out your mouth and say you don't believe you shouldn't be forced to do something in this game, you're immediately off on the wrong foot in you lack of understanding that you are not forced to do anything. 

     

    Those barriers you're talking about is being placed not by DE but OP as he believes that he doesn't like any of the cosmetics in the game that's fine...an option has been talked about for placing that same feature on the default helmet. So what's the banter going about?

     

    All I sense is entitlement here, as I've stated before. 

     

    And if OP opens up discussion about it that's what I'm discussing... I'm discussing that it comes off as entitlement that you believe you believe the game should be altered and fit to your needs or else it hinders your gameplay.

  6. Well does the dual decurion come to mind for anyone? Since there are no secondaries in archwing? What about dual shotties? Sawn off shotties introduction? Dual crossbows as an introduction?

    Something barely big enough to be a primary but small enough to hold two.

    What about attached weapons?

    Like a flamrthrower attached to each forearm, both attached a pack on the back....like a realy heavy weapon flamethrower.

    Or even beam weapons.

    I really like this idea!

  7. Has the discussion of dual primaries ever come up before?

     

    Is there a reason why they don't exist?

     

    I thought about it the other day.. it'd be pretty cool to have something like dual rifles or even dual nade launchers.

     

    Would it be too much of a power creep?

     

    Though honestly for  the upcoming content I honestly don't know if "power creep" has too much of a place anymore. 

     

    Discuss!

  8. Ill be fine if you can use default helmets with it and only helmets.

     

    Thats actually how we wanted our stat helmets to be like.

     

    But we also need to understand that some ppl might not like optional cosmetics like armors syandanas etc, so lets not force them to wear them to get stat boost. Also pay2win since most of syandanas/armors are plat only, rest are event or void trader available only.

     

     

    All of my commentary being said, It's understandable that people don't want to be locked into a feature of the game they rather not participate or invest in.

     

    However, the same could be said for me and those who WANT or are excited for this piece of news. I like the idea of a game item that could be used to imbue our cosmetics with tiny boosts/additives.

     

    And I hope that DE does not alter their plan to release this because of people's 'concerns' with them now being "FORCED" to wear cosmetics. 

  9. It could be around 6(chest, syandana etc) bonuses "burned" into different cosmetics for all I know. Not having them will be really dumb at that point. So definition of 'choice' will be very stretched there.

     

     

    Obviously it's DE's fault. They did not provide the cosmetic that I find aesthetically attractive or, at least not goofy looking.

     

    Listen to this guy.. and I'd like to point out the think plume of entitlement that this community more often than not projects.

     

    he said "obviously it's DE's fault" and his reasoning for claiming that it is DE's fault is because "They did not provide the cosmetic that  'I' find aesthetically attractive..."

  10. Can we have a discussion without people being absurd please?

     

     

    That's another thing. All frames have the option of a helmet. That you can potentially use this thing on. LOL.. I honestly believe people see an opportunity to inject some dismay or conflict with something and let loose. 

     

    It's not even out yet but you want to "raise concerns" as if the news was tragic to you. Come on man..

  11. Nobody's fault? DE can't make cosmetics that every single person will like, it's impossible. And someone prefers the look of the default helmet or prefers not to use a syndana on a certain frame that's certainly not something that's their fault that should be punished with not getting bonus stats.

     

    The fact that you think that it's PUNISHING not getting bonus stats because you don't like the looks of cosmetics..it's silly.

     

    Where was your arguement when sigil's  bonus modifiers for standing were introduced? 

  12. It's cosmetics.. of your choice. With a stat modifier you can ONLY get with actually playing the game. Did you pick up on any of that? 

     

    If you don't use any cosmetics bro who's fault/issue is that? Honestly. 

  13. Great post, OP, thanks.  Hopefully this will get them to listen.  As someone who has spent a lot of money on this game, this constant push towards mega-grind (and I mean mega not just the good ole days of normal grind) has completely burnt me out.  I can barely log in and run a single mission these days before I'm just fed up with it.

     

    The game doesnt burn you out. You burn yourself out from the game. It's good to take breaks sometimes. 

  14. from this topic, i think the "gotta catch em all nature" of warframe has been exposed enough, i had never tought about that, but is actually true, the game play can be fun, the lore can be interesting, but in the longest term, i play this because i too want to have it all

     

    You play any game because you want to have it all. Otherwise what is the point of playing. It's human nature to want to have all of something. 

     

    It's not a reason to complain that you can't get it all as fast as you want to get it.

     

    That's my point.

  15. Because Warframe is about getting EVERYTHING. 

     

    I say this because each item is unique.

     

     

    But the massive grind is the reason I stopped playing. DE doesn't want you to have fun they want you to grind and stay for as long as possible now. Which is going the wrong way because you got enough content to keep players around for a long ! time.

     

    No.

    Like.. No. Warframe isn't about "getting everything" and your reasoning about it could be said.. quite literally about any game that exists. It's a very very weak arguement as to why EVERYTHING should change to accommodate you and other people. 

     

    I've been saying this for a while. People are entirely too hypersensitive about how this game is structured. As mentioned before legendary mods take about 132 cores to rank to 8.  RANK 8 dude. have you seen the stats at rank 8? They're very little distance away from being topped off. And if you want to min-max everything then YES it should take a buttload of time to do it. 

     

    That is a WORLD of difference and gives supports my confusion as to why everyone is freaking about the core "REDISTRIBUTION" ( I like that word rather than nerf.) I LIKE that you can now go other places in the star map to get something to help you progress further. I literally hated ONLY being able to do T4S for one item.

     

    And i'd really like people to stop putting words in "DE's mouth" when talking about stuff. Unless DE has come out themselves and stated "We don't want you to have any fun we want you to grin and stay for as long as possible now" Then you're talking out your nether regions. Honestly.

×
×
  • Create New...