[DE]Grzegorz Posted June 29, 2015 Share Posted June 29, 2015 Controllers seem to be immune to framerate induced issues thanks to how imprecise and lousy they are. There's always deadzone both software and mechanical, controllers are generally imprecise and kinda laggy to begin with (mostly thanks to aforementioned deadzone), also, inconsistent acceleration amounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardianshotable43 Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 30 FPS is the threshold to the word "Playable" for most videogames. lower than that, and you will not get the full experience BUT, if you want lagless gameplay and or is playing fast-paced gameplay, 60 FPS is for you (my vote on this <- one) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)Pharen Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 No they dont, i'm not sure where are you getting all that but the difference between 30, 60 and 120 is clearly visible and not "exactly the same". thats wrong. You should watch some John Carmack's videos where he talks about VR screens. Like this one: Theres a difference between percievable frames, and percievable difference in frames. In theory the human eye can see 1000FPS, however the human eye would not notice the difference in changes in the frames, maybe you should do some actual research first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zdravko Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 well tbh... i play games mostly in 30 fps... so when they boosted dual-core optimization a bit ... and when my fps was about 50... it was opening my eyes again for the first time... xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genzaio Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 (edited) well tbh... i play games mostly in 30 fps... so when they boosted dual-core optimization a bit ... and when my fps was about 50... it was opening my eyes again for the first time... xD Same here, most high end graphic games i tend to play at 20-30fps provided i set my graphics low enough, by now im used to it... with such pretty games coming out and my computer being technologically behind.. i dont see myself getting better hardware until a few years from now. None the less to say, game companies should always allow for 60fps for the game to be optimal for higher end computers and the option of a lower fps for those with lower end computers. Makes sense really... Edited June 30, 2015 by Genzaio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)eliteforcejohn Posted July 2, 2015 Share Posted July 2, 2015 Same issues going on for batman arkham knight on the pc. Apparently its locked to 30fps and people are going crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brynslustafir Posted July 2, 2015 Share Posted July 2, 2015 (edited) Framerates lower than 60 result in a loss of responsiveness and can cause motion sickness for a surprisingly large number of people. Personally I think 30FPS in anything except a turn based game where responsiveness means nothing is garbage, and it frustrates me that so many people are simply ignorant to the downsides and negative impacts of playing games at 30 FPS instead of 60 or 120. It's as clear as day, yet people still can't understand it. It's not just about how it looks, it's about how it feels. When you enter a command, it has to be processed and executed on the next available frame. With more frames every second, the next frame arrives sooner, resulting in a significantly reduced delay between the button press and the in-game execution. That's why game control feels worse at lower framerates and better at higher framerates. It's a difference that is much easier to feel in an interactive setting than it is to see on a video, although most people I know can tell the difference just by looking at it. Edited July 2, 2015 by Plasmaface Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakcal Posted July 2, 2015 Share Posted July 2, 2015 The fact that theres 60 fps in youtube shows that there's a difference, because if it's not put at 60, it's locked at 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denizium Posted July 2, 2015 Share Posted July 2, 2015 Something I found that may be of use, if you just see a single line there is either something seriously wrong with your browser or your computer is VERY slow. I suggest opening it in its own tab so there's no chance of slow down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheErebus. Posted July 2, 2015 Author Share Posted July 2, 2015 Something I found that may be of use, if you just see a single line there is either something seriously wrong with your browser or your computer is VERY slow. I suggest opening it in its own tab so there's no chance of slow down. I did as you said, the 15 fps lags behind. 30 to 60 is fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denizium Posted July 2, 2015 Share Posted July 2, 2015 I did as you said, the 15 fps lags behind. 30 to 60 is fine. 30 should be lagging behind the 60. I do believe your browser is the problem here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheErebus. Posted July 2, 2015 Author Share Posted July 2, 2015 30 should be lagging behind the 60. I do believe your browser is the problem here. I'm using Google chrome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakcal Posted July 2, 2015 Share Posted July 2, 2015 I'm using Google chrome. Try reinstalling it, it might be bugged. There's a pretty big difference in the lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brynslustafir Posted July 3, 2015 Share Posted July 3, 2015 I did as you said, the 15 fps lags behind. 30 to 60 is fine. There may actually be something wrong with your eyes or the Occipital lobe of your brain. 30 is clearly lagging behind 60. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eidolon_Slayer Posted July 3, 2015 Share Posted July 3, 2015 30 fps gives you more time to react in games like Dark Souls, however naturally fast paced games like most FPS should have 30+. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kthal Posted July 3, 2015 Share Posted July 3, 2015 I did as you said, the 15 fps lags behind. 30 to 60 is fine. You know that feeling when something is wrong, but no-one is at fault... <INTERNAL RAGE> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheErebus. Posted July 3, 2015 Author Share Posted July 3, 2015 You know that feeling when something is wrong, but no-one is at fault... <INTERNAL RAGE> It's my eyes, it's my browser... Eugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notlamprey Posted July 3, 2015 Share Posted July 3, 2015 It's my eyes, it's my browser... Eugh There are lots of ill-informed posts in this thread. I cut my losses when it became apparent that people would rather imagine a way in which they could feel like superior humans than learn some actual science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts