Xedek Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 I don't think open world environments would suit Warframe. For one, the sheer amount of work would be staggering. The mission based deployment is quick, easy and effective. That sort of redesign seems like it would require a complete overhaul and would result in a very different game. With that said, I love expansive environmental games that allow for free exploration, so I wouldn't mind seeing some sort of limited open world, that integrates with the current system instead of replacing it completely. Perhaps some sort of Hub for each planet that deployed to different regions, or organized zones that made for easy squad formation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoboDoge Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Instead open world, i would like to see instanced zones. So there wouldnt be zone campers and bots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adarazrad Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 the idea sounds nice, i always love open world, but this would completely change warframe ( no more cells of 4 players, able to get out of certian map and such stuff ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feallike Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 (edited) That's their problem. Actually i have a pretty crappy PC, and i don't have the money to make them, because i have to help my family and friends. NOT EVERYONE IS RICH AND HAS THERE PARENTS BUY THEM ALL THE S#&$ THEY WANT LIKE YOU. >:( Edited August 2, 2014 by Feallike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adarazrad Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 maybe instaed, we could get " exploration zone " like the hubs that shuoldev been added into each planet would become a small exlploration zone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynaris Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 (edited) I wouuuld argue with that. I'm playing it on lowish settings, and even then I find it pretty damn gorgeous. Warframe is no amazing graphical showcase either. Edited August 2, 2014 by Cynaris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrKage Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 (edited) It wont work ,the hubs are better than a full world because if they did a full world or worlds because well theres many they would have to remake almost all of Warframe, and agree with people saying dat low end pc "gamers" should not be gaming , if a game can become big ,real,immersive,beautiful with the current gen of graphics cards and etc, we gamers dat for me at least build theyre pc during years saved money to upgrade more, should not be hold back because people think theyre TI-82 were made to game no they werent they were make to work purposes or watching porn online not for gaming. Edited August 2, 2014 by MrKage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amazerath Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 I like this game cause of the waiting factor that is involved with making new frames or weapons ect, but wouldnt it be nice if you could actually go to a planet and actually traverse across the planet kind of like the new rpgmmo game called " destiny ". i think that would be an nice touch to the game what are your ideas? I'd rather have them spend their resources elsewhere. Warframe is not an exploration game so travelling time would quickly become tiresome for many people. Waiting is only really interesting when things are fresh and new. After you've been staring at space for hours and hours, it gets a lot less interesting and you start asking yourself "why the heck is this taking so long?" It could be made optional, yes. But again, this is F2P and the dev team has very limited time and resources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berserkerkitten Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 I just wanna shoot'n'loot. I don't care about exploring and most of all, I don't care about hubs where I bump into other players. Most interactions with random players on here aren't very fun, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DecapitatingJim Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 (edited) No it's not. You can make a new decent gaming PC or upgrade your existing one for just a few hundred dollars, and the specs will be about equal to or greater then the newer consoles. If you can't or won't upgrade your PC to be more powerful than the average toaster then gaming most likely isn't a big deal to you and if it is, then you need to rethink a few things. You do realize not everyone lives in America? A few hundred dollars to me is my entire savings, and that is roughly what computer parts cost in my country anyway. So no, you can't just make a new decent gaming pc or upgrade. Not everyone has readily sources of disposable income, and not everyone lives in a country with a decent currency. Are those people just not allowed to game then? And don't mention consoles because those things cost around the same as a low end PC where I currently live. I'm not getting into a whole argument here, but the stance that low end PC owners shouldn't be gaming, is like saying poor people shouldn't be gaming. Which makes you sound like an elitist prat. Edited August 2, 2014 by DecapitatingJim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(NSW)LilVanu Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 (edited) You do realize not everyone lives in America? A few hundred dollars to me is my entire savings, and that is roughly what computer parts cost in my country anyway. So no, you can't just make a new decent gaming pc or upgrade. Not everyone has readily sources of disposable income, and not everyone lives in a country with a decent currency. Are those people just not allowed to game then? And don't mention consoles because those things cost around the same as a low end PC where I currently live. I'm not getting into a whole argument here, but the stance that low end PC owners shouldn't be gaming, is like saying poor people shouldn't be gaming. Which makes you sound like an elitist prat. To buy a PS4 in brazil that will set you back a good $1,840 I'm not even joking. I don't live in brazil... but that's just kind of ridiculous. Some counties consoles are ludicrously high in price because of taxes, importing etc... As someone who owns both a gaming rig and an old pc that can still run games. I don't see why a company would not bother making games for older rigs... More people will be able to pick it up and if it's as small a game as warframe it makes little sense for it be extremely intensive. The graphics are good but they're not that stressful on older systems. edit: I'm also tired of peoples arrogance. "Just go out and buy new parts lulz" I live in a crappy town. The best PC shop I have here is full of old junk that'll makes your eyes roll. They don't even sell proper parts just computer apparel.. You ask them "Do you have a laser mouse?" and they just point to an infrared. As for PC World and Maplins. They're bloody expensive. I do buy parts online but not many people have that privilege. Edited August 2, 2014 by Sutherland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezairin Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 What would I think? I'd think it is no longer a game about Space Ninjas doing missions. I'd meet a lot more people I don't care about. And there are a lot more games out there that'd just do it much much better, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etsoree Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 WF will be like destiny but in third person view. Trust me destiny is like warframe gameplay wise without the parkour. Would like see vast tilesets tho. Large ones like the corpus base boss tileset but bigger. Destiny doesn't have Warframe's gameplay. Destiny has every other FPS gameplay, with some powers. It's like Mass Effect 3's multiplayer with more customization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feallike Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Anyone who says people who can't afford "Next Gen" PC's are not real gamers, or shouldn't game are, what you call, an Ignorant person. Unless you have extra cash to throw around, or your family is in good place financially i doubt anyone going to spend all their money on a Gaming PC. :/ Also, you people get that only 1/2 of the gaming community have those HIGHTECH 1500 dollor PC's, most of them are on 600 dollar PC or on Laptops. Companies understand that, DE understands that, that's why they strain to make there game accessible to Lowend users. Thats why games like TF2 are using low end graphics. Believe it or not, Low End PC users are part of the community. -.- There is money from them, because 50 dollars is soooooooo much harder to get then 1000 dollars. SO MUCH HARDER. =.= There is no way, people who don't have 1000 dollars have 50 dollars, ITS IMPOSSIBLE! (rant over) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayzemet Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 I think that adding arround 10-20 more rooms, in the tilesets, and also ading another 6-7 tilesets with the same variety could make the monotomy go away, and it would be the same amount of work needed from graphic cards. But i also think there should be an open world, place just one or two idk lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quatrez Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 So Warframe in Borderlands? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scherhardt Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Destiny doesn't have Warframe's gameplay. Destiny has every other FPS gameplay, with some powers. It's like Mass Effect 3's multiplayer with more customization. I could prolly change my opinion 'bout that by now(I've played the beta on my friends PS4.). One thing I can say that the way both games progress are really close. By progression I mean. Do missions/quest > clear planets > farming/grinding. In customization I can say Destiny is abit deeper(skill effect wise)because of class branches in the future. Warframe can prolly compete with that with the focus system. Then again TPS > FPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaugahn Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 The evolution engine doesn't do wide open spaces well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHideyoshi Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 dis would actually be cool i guess but at the same time i wouldn't know how we could get to missions on a open world thou lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snydrex Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 SKYFRAME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now