LazyKnight Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 (edited) Though it does look a bit broken. Its broken compared to Grinlok, and when DE 'power creeped' a weapon that was just released it is a HORRID precedent to set. Edited February 27, 2014 by LazyKnight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoomFruit Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Well, considering those are meant as one-shot weapons, status procs wont deal much, right? Corrosive/viral procs on high-level enemies? However, with twice as much of a multishot chance (180% to 90%), the respective status chance becomes separated only by a factor of 6%. Hmm, good point. I would say something about 2 multishot mods required on the pistol, but I'm adding hammer shot on the rifle anyway for the status chance. In fact, that just makes the power disparity even worse. I'm starting to regret the 3 Forma I stuck on my Grinlok now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archistopheles Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I'm not happy. Don't talk to me about Mastery level, and I don't mind that it has the cool animation (that I knew it would have), but it completely pissed all over my Seer in every single stat. At least I have my zoom, though. -_- Dual Cestra made me mad because the single version is in the market. Grinlok made me mad because it was bland for a Clan Tech weapon. Marelok (love the name, animation is spot on) made me mad because it dropped it's pants, and layed a big steamer on top of my Seer. I'm not interested in discussing my opinions in this post, this is pure feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inez Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 The seer was intended as a lowbie weapon. New players farm for it in the very first system of the game. And evidently its a lot easier to get then when we all farmed it when it first came out. The Grinlock is pretty horrible though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenLetterKWord Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 (edited) Nope. No, actually. It's still irrelevant. It's irrelevant because the Marelok doesn't compete against the Grinlok. They're not the same type of weapon, so you can equip both at a time, get it? Primaries. Apples. Secondaries. Oranges. At least the OP had the good sense to compare the Marelok to the Brakk, which is another secondary. You can only equip one secondary weapon. Thus, performance primacy is relevant. (Also, "lever action" doesn't mean S#&$. That's just an animation. It's functionally identical to semi-auto.) _____ I suppose from an "artistic" perspective, you could argue that a primary weapon should "realistically" be more powerful than a secondary weapon of similar design. (Maybe that's why you think lever-action matters.) Of course, attempting to enforce realism in Warframe is futile. This is a video game we're playing here, not a documentary. Edited February 27, 2014 by Knaimhe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oishii Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 No, actually. It's still irrelevant. It's irrelevant because the Marelok doesn't compete against the Grinlok. They're not the same type of weapon, so you can equip both at a time, get it? Primaries. Apples. Secondaries. Oranges. At least the OP had the good sense to compare the Marelok to the Brakk, which is another secondary. You can only equip one secondary weapon. Thus, performance primacy is relevant. (Also, "lever action" doesn't mean S#&$. That's just an animation. It's functionally identical to semi-auto.) _____ I suppose from an "artistic" perspective, you could argue that a primary weapon should "realistically" be more powerful than a secondary weapon of similar design. (Maybe that's why you think lever-action matters.) Of course, attempting to enforce realism in Warframe is futile. This is a video game we're playing here, not a documentary. So sawing off the the barrel makes the Grimlock a better weapon? That's dumb even by video game standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NikolaiLev Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Its broken compared to Grinlok, and when DE 'power creeped' a weapon that was just released it is a HORRID precedent to set. Yeah, well, DE has been letting power creep happen for a long time, and few complain about it, sadly. I'm not happy. Don't talk to me about Mastery level, and I don't mind that it has the cool animation (that I knew it would have), but it completely &!$$ed all over my Seer in every single stat. At least I have my zoom, though. -_- Dual Cestra made me mad because the single version is in the market. Grinlok made me mad because it was bland for a Clan Tech weapon. Marelok (love the name, animation is spot on) made me mad because it dropped it's pants, and layed a big steamer on top of my Seer. I'm not interested in discussing my opinions in this post, this is pure feedback. Indeed. Power creep central, here. The seer was intended as a lowbie weapon. New players farm for it in the very first system of the game. And evidently its a lot easier to get then when we all farmed it when it first came out. The Grinlock is pretty horrible though. Why should it be intended for only new players? Introducing flat upgrades is just lazy; it reduces player choice and punishes investment in a weapon simply because a player likes it, and encourages players to simply strive for what's most powerful. No, actually. It's still irrelevant. It's irrelevant because the Marelok doesn't compete against the Grinlok. They're not the same type of weapon, so you can equip both at a time, get it? Primaries. Apples. Secondaries. Oranges. The game has, until now, been balanced for the fact that secondaries are always weaker than primaries. This seems to be changing, for no real reason. There's no valid gameplay-related reason why the Marelok should be more powerful than a primary when almost all secondaries have thus far adhered to the model that they are weaker than primaries. This is just power creep for the sake of profit. Either that or DE really is incompetent at balance design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrosslyIncandescent1709 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 just swap the stats on the marelok and grinlok, problem solved... i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishki88 Posted February 27, 2014 Author Share Posted February 27, 2014 (edited) Guys, I really want to pump the same AMT of forma into this gun has my Brakk. But I FEAR an Ak version real soon....it's hard trying to complete my hypothesis when a dual version is coming soon .............screw it I'm going for it Edited February 27, 2014 by Ishki88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archistopheles Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Guys, I really want to pump the same AMT of forma into this gun has my Brakk. But I FEAR an Ak version real soon....it's hard trying to complete my hypothesis when a dual version is coming soon .............screw it I'm going for it You'll be sorry... Or you won't care when they do release the dual version... It all depends on your character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObviousLee Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 DPSframe says it does the same damage per shot as the brakk. use gottfausts dps calculator, its WAY more accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenLetterKWord Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 (edited) So sawing off the the barrel makes the Grimlock a better weapon? That's dumb even by video game standards. Come on, seriously. This can't be your counterargument. "Oh it doesn't make sense." Do you want to hear about the other things in Warframe which don't make sense? Lasers have travel time. Other lasers disappear after a certain distance. Explosive decompression is for pussies. Ammo. (Also, the rockets for my Ogris somehow come in itty bitty 20-count boxes.) Enemy ships (and Jupiter stations) have dedicated Tenno extraction points. Never have I ever seen an extraction team for any cryopod. Not to mention, we keep finding cryopods in the exact same Grineer/Corpus-controlled locales. Life support in open environments. How'd the infested manage to "shut off" an entire planet's life support? (OP pls narf) Orbs in general. How did I manage to smack the abstract concept of health out of a Grineer footlocker? Innumerably more things which I don't care to list at the moment. It's not just Warframe. In basically all FPS games, shotguns fire God's Own Thunder at close range, but then become about as effective as a sneeze at anything beyond p!ss-distance. Especially automatic shotguns. Plus, you can't just say the only difference between the Grinlok and the Marelok is a shorter barrel. They've obviously got slightly different designs. The internal mechanisms may vary greatly. Not that any of this matters. (By the way, there's no "Grimlock".) The game has, until now, been balanced for the fact that secondaries are always weaker than primaries. This seems to be changing, for no real reason. There's no valid gameplay-related reason why the Marelok should be more powerful than a primary when almost all secondaries have thus far adhered to the model that they are weaker than primaries. The premise of your argument is false because Brakk is why. (TL;DR: Brakk gg) Edited February 27, 2014 by Knaimhe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galactix Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 (edited) Marelok has an extremely tight spread, which counters its high damage scales. Brakk has a wider spread, but would most likely do the same damage if it had the same spread reduction as the Marelok. Soooo, you're pretty much just reducing the spread to a completely one shot - one kill weapon and paying for the Western flip animation...which is the only reason why I like it ;) Edited February 27, 2014 by Galactix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble_Cactus Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 (edited) That's irrelevant. Grinlok is a primary. Marelok is a secondary. Apples and oranges here, man. Apples and oranges that fill very, very similar roles. So more like... Granny Smiths and Fujis. Why eat a Fuji that is likely all gross and grainy inside when you could have a nice crisp Granny Smith? This is just power creep for the sake of profit. Either that or DE really is incompetent at balance design. Why not both? Edited February 27, 2014 by Noble_Cactus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazyKnight Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 It's irrelevant because the Marelok doesn't compete against the Grinlok. Grinlok is outclassed by Latron prime (its primary equivalent) and the only reason to use Grinlok would be for the status effects. Grinlok raw damage is just bad (if you lack malignant force don't bother with Grinlok). This might be a time when DE just released a pointless weapon (Grinlok) and a weapon that looks just like it only drives home the realization. The game has, until now, been balanced for the fact that secondaries are always weaker than primaries. One word: "Acrid" DE only brought secondary in line with the damage 2.0 patch. They have a track record of the side-arms being the de facto weapon of choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenLetterKWord Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Apples and oranges that fill very, very similar roles. So more like... Granny Smiths and Fujis. Why eat a Fuji that is likely all gross and grainy inside when you could have a nice crisp Granny Smith? No, see. The point was that the Grin- and Marelok aren't mutually exclusive. You can have both a mediocre Fuji and a nice Granny Smith; they aren't in direct competition against each other. Grinlok is outclassed by Latron prime (its primary equivalent) and the only reason to use Grinlok would be for the status effects. Grinlok raw damage is just bad (if you lack malignant force don't bother with Grinlok). This might be a time when DE just released a pointless weapon (Grinlok) and a weapon that looks just like it only drives home the realization. Sure, but you see, the guy I quoted tried to emphasize the Grinlok's inadequacy by comparing it to the Marelok. This thread isn't about the Grinlok anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazyKnight Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) This thread isn't about the Grinlok anyways. You are right, it is about Brakk and Marelok, and Brakk is still king of raw dps. Marelok is not even in competition with Brakk at point blank, and if Marelok got nerfed it would be for other reasons (fixing typo like AkMagnus). Fire-rate is the short answer of why Brakk is king. Edited February 28, 2014 by LazyKnight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerdude8 Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 That's irrelevant. Grinlok is a primary. Marelok is a secondary. Apples and oranges here, man. Apples and Apples cut in half. The Marelok is LITERALLY a SHORTER Grinlok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoshLovesYou Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) The hilarious thing about this, above all? Is how even though it's a pistol version of the Grinlock in terms of straight up art design identity? It's better than that Grineer sniper rifle in almost every way save for long range accuracy.The only more hilarious thing is how folks in this thread haven't noticed that yet. Seriously: Look at the two weapons. Edited February 28, 2014 by KoshLovesYou Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riccoshot Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Lookin to DPS, Marelok pretty much fits the niche of 15k DPS (+/-) secondaries aside with Akvasto, Embolist, Detron, Dual Cestras, Bronko Prime, Akmagnus, Wraith Twin Vipers. A tier higher there's a lonely Stug with 22k non-charge. And Brakk is still a top secondary with 30k (damage falloff though). As a clan weapon maybe it needs a rank only (i would give it a rank 5-6 for instance), but i doubt it since DE sill don't care about the simpliest balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenLetterKWord Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) Apples and Apples cut in half. The Marelok is LITERALLY a SHORTER Grinlok. Lurk moar. The point was that the Grin- and Marelok aren't mutually exclusive. You can have both a mediocre Fuji and a nice Granny Smith; they aren't in direct competition against each other. It's irrelevant because the Marelok doesn't compete against the Grinlok. They're not the same type of weapon, so you can equip both at a time, get it? Primaries. Apples. Secondaries. Oranges. At least the OP had the good sense to compare the Marelok to the Brakk, which is another secondary. You can only equip one secondary weapon. Thus, performance primacy is relevant. Woah this spoiler is borked. Fakkin' WF forums quote format, bein' all weird an' shet. Edited February 28, 2014 by Knaimhe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike29tw Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 No, see. The point was that the Grin- and Marelok aren't mutually exclusive. You can have both a mediocre Fuji and a nice Granny Smith; they aren't in direct competition against each other. Sure, but you see, the guy I quoted tried to emphasize the Grinlok's inadequacy by comparing it to the Marelok. This thread isn't about the Grinlok anyways. So can I hold grinlock in one hand and marelok in another? No. I can only use one at any given time. They ARE competing against each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAYABU5A Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 It's not the nerf you should be afraid off. DEvs said that these pistols will be akimbo so Twin Marelok is what's more likely. Although the forums will get it nerfed anyway so it's futile to fight it marelok will definitely be made akimbo ? thats the main concern as no one wants to invest taters and formas into marelok then twin marelok comes out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishki88 Posted February 28, 2014 Author Share Posted February 28, 2014 So can I hold grinlock in one hand and marelok in another? No. I can only use one at any given time. They ARE competing against each other. Hitman Prime :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix86 Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 It is strong but Brakk wins in DPS, reload and overall ease to use Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now