SenorClipClop Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 17 hours ago, Futurehero said: So, what if DE decided to release Sentient guns that deal 5k damage per hit and are full auto, and can only be bought for 300 platinum ? Would that really be a problem ? Warframe has never been remotely pay-to-win, and it never will be. The game is fair to both players who support the company and those who can't afford to. The only things anyone has to buy with real money are things that don't affect gameplay, like cosmetics. If DE makes any new weapon, it will be free to acquire and use. Don't worry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TARINunit9 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 2 hours ago, Evanescent said: Ever tried a Superman game? Nothing hurts you, everything dies in one shot. *awkward cough* Hell, even if I wasn't joking, I'm actually not seeing any Superman games that let Superman be at his full cheat-code-level power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evanescent Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Just now, TARINunit9 said: *awkward cough* Hell, even if I wasn't joking, I'm actually not seeing any Superman games that let Superman be at his full cheat-code-level power Exactly. It's just not logical to design a game where you can be a god with no drawbacks, like OP is suggesting with his idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-HAKUNA-YOUR-TATAS- Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 I dunno... I'm really happy with the "spirit" of Warframe being a F2P title. As it stands with trading people that don't buy platinum can sort of farm it by selling things to people who do buy platinum. It's a great model. I feel that if the most powerful items in the game are locked behind paywalls (even though platinum can sort of be farmed), it's just not in the spirit of F2P to do so. Also, it kinda gives a bad impression to people who are outsiders and not really familiar with the game. Could be a major turn off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Compassion Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Are you complaining that we can all warframes and weapons im the game for free? lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Datsher Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 20 hours ago, Futurehero said: -This would finally put an end to the enemy scaling problem . -Whoever thinks those weapons are too much, can simply not use them. This same thing is said about things like the Tonkor, or Ember. So why would this be different. -Since not everyone can afford a 300 platinum gun, you probably won't see everyone in Pub plays with this . -People finally have an option to easily finish raids. -Players would still have incentives to make other guns ,the same way people are still crafting things like the twin Basolk when Broken War is given to you for free. 1. No it wouldn't. Saving time on fixing something by adding an infinite damage weapon isn't fixing anything. 2+3. That's like closing your eyes and saying it isn't there because you can't see it. 4. Aren't raids already easily doable? Never bothered with them. 5. Of course people will still build trash weapons because they want mastery. People want to rank up, be max. Level. I'm just gonna assume that this post is bait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)Shadow196_4L Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Truly curious as to what topic the OP will create next. Perhaps "Warframe should be $60 because it's as good as a AAA game". I'm sorry man, but you need to rethink your topics, because not everyone thinks like you do, and it seems that this game is fairly large and constantly has new players/content because it has little to no pay to win. I agree with the others in this thread, I'm extremely glad you aren't in charge of the business aspect of this wonderful game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomppak Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Warframe is curious in that you _CAN_ pay to win - Basically, you can get anything and everything just by throwing enough money at the game, but... Then... You would win... In a co-op game..? I mean, seriously, then what? Honestly, if this game was less co-op and more pvp oriented, I likely wouldn't enjoy it nearly as much. Besides, if you buy everything, what's the point in playing anymore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Tomppak said: Warframe is curious in that you _CAN_ pay to win - Basically, you can get anything and everything just by throwing enough money at the game, but... Then... You would win... In a co-op game..? I mean, seriously, then what? Honestly, if this game was less co-op and more pvp oriented, I likely wouldn't enjoy it nearly as much. Besides, if you buy everything, what's the point in playing anymore? i didnt buy everything as well as i simply like what i did in warframe when it comes to share about "moving in real cash", im not sorry about after checking a few other games ... and DE know that ^^) look at steves and the others developers-faces they show us, there you can see they know the value about warframe ))))))))))) Edited June 20, 2016 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)bulex84 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 22 hours ago, Futurehero said: So, what if DE decided to release Sentient guns that deal 5k damage per hit and are full auto, and can only be bought for 300 platinum ? Would that really be a problem ? -This game is Co-op. You're not going against someone who is paying for better gear, in fact, them being in your party is only a benefit. -You can trade a lot of things for platinum, so at the end of the day, platinum just becomes another thing you can grind for. -In fact, a lot of veterans are probably sitting on buckets of the stuff, earned JUST by trading. -This would finally put an end to the enemy scaling problem . -Whoever thinks those weapons are too much, can simply not use them. This same thing is said about things like the Tonkor, or Ember. So why would this be different. -Since not everyone can afford a 300 platinum gun, you probably won't see everyone in Pub plays with this . -People finally have an option to easily finish raids. -"Trivializing content" is not a thing . People have been trivializing content for years and it's still being played just as well. -Players would still have incentives to make other guns ,the same way people are still crafting things like the twin Basolk when Broken War is given to you for free. Honestly, except the knee-jerk reaction that people have to the term "pay to win", is there any argument as to why this couldn't be a thing? It would certainly make DE a lot of money, and players can still technically get this weapon for free through trading. 1 no 2 no 3 no why you want to pay more ? I've spend more tnah 150euro already because I respect devs for this game not because i have to . If that was one of P2W game I would't play it . If you want pay pay but don't try to force others to pay . simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roachester Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) You know what's really scary? Regardless of whether or not OP is just trolling, people ACTUALLY think like this. There's something wrong with the gaming industry. Edited June 20, 2016 by Roachester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Letter13 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Thread seems to have run its course. Locking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts