CCamp88 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 So, I'm sure this has been brought up before, but let me say as a MR22 with 1000's of hours in the game, this has to be the most stupid thing i have experienced. http://prntscr.com/d0g%&^ How can a spell be absolutely useless!? Granted there are some out there that might as well be useless, but they technically do something. This here, costs energy but you get absolutely nothing out of it other than the affinity from casting the spell I recently was putting some forma on Nova p (givent double affinity weekend) and i decided to do a low duration, high eff, high strength build to spam my 1 and 2 while leveling. Then i noticed this. with low duration Novas #1 Null Star produces 0, yes Zero, particles. How can this be!? I mean i know how it works and is based off of duration. But the fact that it should have a minimum of 1 at the very least. I'm not sure if this was an unseen bug, as most (if not all) nova's use duration. TLDR 15% duration on nova = Null star with 0 particles; Essentially useless. Please tell me this was/is a bug. Because seriously, as mentioned this is the most utterly stupid thing ive seen in the game to date. Regards, -CCamp88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oranji Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 This is so funny it made my day. HAhahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCamp88 Posted October 29, 2016 Author Share Posted October 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Oranji said: This is so funny it made my day. HAhahaha Hahaha. isnt it!? For real man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sintag Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Oh god. With negative duration, would this make NEGATIVE PARTICLES?! Test this for science! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyborg-Rox Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Well... it is Rank 2. Maybe you'll get one when it reaches Rank 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCamp88 Posted October 29, 2016 Author Share Posted October 29, 2016 Just now, Cyborg-Rox said: Well... it is Rank 2. Maybe you'll get one when it reaches Rank 3? nope, i didnt. still at 0 Even though, it still should have 1 at any rank. or one would think anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NekroArts Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 This has to be a bug. The only way to get 0 particles is to have 0 duration; 15% of 6 is 0.9 and since you can't have a decimal amount of particles that number has to round up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heckzu Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 8 hours ago, NekroArts said: This has to be a bug. The only way to get 0 particles is to have 0 duration; 15% of 6 is 0.9 and since you can't have a decimal amount of particles that number has to round up. Actually, it would depend on how rounding is handled. In this scenario, the particle count is floored to 0 because having less than 1 particle means you don't have 1 whole particle, so it makes sense to floor the number. Flooring is used instead of simply rounding in scenarios where the result requires an integer and the result would be incorrect if rounded up. One such example would be: how many 10 kg objects can you place onto a cart with a 99 kg carrying capacity before it breaks, assuming the cart breaks once it goes over its carrying capacity? 99/10=9.9 which rounds to 10, but putting 10 of the said objects onto the cart would break it, therefore 10 is an incorrect answer and 9 is the correct answer. But I suppose in the case of Nova's Null Star, an exception should be made so that the minimum number of particles should be 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mak_Gohae Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 why would it be a bug? If you lower any stat to crap it will be crap. Having low damage will result in you doing basically no damage no matter the amount of energy spent casting on a damaging ability. What you are asking is for there to be limits on how low the stats go cause it didnt work on the combo you were attempting. BTW, spamming A-1 for Nova is not really a good thing. That spell takes a long time to cast, it's not a spamming spell. At least that's what i remember from the last time i used her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealPandemonium Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Why would you lower duration if you want to use Null Star, which is a duration-based skill that you want to cast less often, not more? AMD's range is also unaffected by duration mods so you can pump NM without worry for that build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)HSomDevil Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Some frames have 2 (even 3) practically useless abilities. Nova has one of (if not THE) best abilities in the entire game. And on top of that, an antimatter tactical nuke coupled with one of the best mobility tools. My point: We should just be quiet lest DE decides to get their sticky hands on Nova. That usually spells disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCamp88 Posted October 30, 2016 Author Share Posted October 30, 2016 "Practically" Useless, and Useless are two different things. Should definately be a minimum cap. As with all/most other spells out there. Other spells like the old nekros shadows, vaubans tesla and bastille, oberons smite, etc, all have a minimum that no matter how much you lower duration/strength (that determines the number) you make it, it still does atleast 1 (if not more). As for why would you want lower duration on null star? more power strenth. transient fort. as well as higher eff. to go with it and antimatter drop. But thats beside the point anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)Darth-Escar Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 I agree. It is a little bit dumb, but even worse must be the build you were using. I believe that there are wrong ways to build. (Unless you're not trying to be effective. Just don't be detrimental to others.) There aren't many, but this is one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notlamprey Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 I don't know if the thread title is accurately communicating the purpose of the thread. Surely you don't mean that it is, categorically, stupid. The math absolutely does lead to some silly (but not fun) results, and that probably warrants some tweaking. Pedantry aside, this is amusing and good to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now