Jump to content

BETAOPTICS

Master
  • Posts

    4,314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

2,081

About BETAOPTICS

Recent Profile Visitors

3,638 profile views
  1. I think simple toggle and reworking values will suffice.
  2. Cool! Merry Christmas Digital Extremee employees! Merry Christmas fellow Tenno!
  3. Looking good. Please add the information about the last abilities augment and also add a note for those who missed it that Tentacle Swarm does Corrosive damage now instead of Magnetic like it used to.
  4. Like I've said to several others: My posts are not personal evaluations on how things should be but rather evaluations on how things are currently. I don't like the trade laws either hence why my initial post went with I understand that wish but they are still laws that companies are obliged to follow irrespective of my personal viewpoints. Impersonal vs. personal viewpoints.
  5. Lowering prices = altering the trade deal and that is illegal my friend. For example if you go take a look at the prime access bundles, there is a reason why DE only made new bundles available when a new prime access came and not when a pack deal was already going.
  6. It'd be ethically right. But again my comments are not ethical evaluations of how things ought to be, they are evaluations of why DE would take this course of action as it has so many times before this as well (this is not the first time DE has done something like this and they've never decreased monetary prices. Instead they give addtional digital goodies). It is frankly amazing how few on the internet seem to be able to tell the difference between personal and impersonal takes. Oh well I guess it comes with the times we live in.
  7. No? Why are you being dishonest and disingenious? It is mandated by law that you can not alter the deal once it has been sealed monetarily. For instance there was a legal lawsuit few years ago where Elon Musk had to pay up fees for trying to back away from a trade deal on buying Twitter as he had already signed the transaction. Trade law is clumsy, you can't just do whatever you wish however you wish. And again: My comments are not evaluations on how things ought to be but rather they are about how the laws actaully are. It's not my personal opinion on the packs. I would not have said I understand that wish people have made. Now I would suggest you stop being disingenious and stop trolling. It's not productive.
  8. Yeah if you were to risk legal investigation. Like you do realize trade laws exist, right? It's the same reason DE can not re-release the founders program either, as trade laws legally bind them. This is not an evaluation of how things should be but the simple truth of how things are. They suck, yes, and that is all the more reason further consideration should have been had and that's on DE. But I can be pretty confident saying DE nor any other company would be willing to break laws just because they made a bad judgement.
  9. I understand this but the only problem I think it would have is those who already bought the bundle. Not sure how refunds would work there. Maybe? But I think this is the main reason the price was kept as was.
  10. Patience. The update is still deploying due to a technical difficulty. Go make some hot choco while they are hunting the issue and sorting it out.
  11. Still deploying, A technical issue. Hand tight.
  12. Sounds like a you problem. I've never cared for "competitiveness of PvE" games. Especially considering that you believe the weapons are already powerful as they are without the incarnons, and in this current systems in any given week some people will have incarnon's on weapons you won't, and you become what, envious of that? I fail to see the problem. But maybe I'm lucky I am not that envious and petty then, maybe that's my fortunate bias to never haven understood this superficial problem.
×
×
  • Create New...