Jump to content

Skoomaseller

PC Member
  • Posts

    2,759
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5,295

7 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

2,725 profile views
  1. hoping the LoS changes are actually good this time around.
  2. honestly don't see why they can't make it function differently in pvp given the treatment they gave Double Tap
  3. DE yet again implementing their S#&$ LoS check without playtesting I mean XDDDDD guess some things never change even with the exchange of hats/pink shorts
  4. figured you would be blind to your own hubris lol
  5. simple: they don't playtest their game
  6. which you are, bizarrely, trying to use to justify implementing an overall meaningless change
  7. then maybe don't throw around stupid takes like this to try and justify your thoughts: precisely
  8. except your main point would effectively gatekeep those lower spec players all for the sake of "improved ai" which we would obliterate in a macrosecond anyway. trading a few thousand players for a meaningless change (and your other brilliant takes) that so far in this thread only you seem to think is a great idea is... idk if privileged isn't the right word, then perhaps foolish would fit better.
  9. as long as the barrier of entry is low (f2p, low specs etc etc) it'll have some level of popularity. I think warframe is less popular than the ones I mentioned because I think most prefer pvp gameplay, or perhaps the dopamine hits of killing your opponents in pvp. and pvp in warframe is uhhhh...
  10. did not say it was limited to video games, just that it is an example (hence "which includes") and is also the topic at hand.
  11. thank you for proving my point believe it or not I think even the poorest people in the most economically destitute nations deserve to have even a little bit of fun, which includes playing video games. it is why games like lol, cs, blackshot xfire etc are so popular.
  12. I would not take their "difficulty" rating at face value
×
×
  • Create New...