Doughalo2 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 its true and it need to be done. Just because a weap is low mastery to get doesnt mean it should be bad because there are alot of weaps i have fun with but suck later on. even if you potato, 4 forma and elementally mod towards faction, and have all mods maxed, some weaps just cant be fixed with mods Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerFreeman Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 spectra is in dire need of a buff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unknow99 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Weak weapons?Which one are you referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlchemistMute Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 (edited) All Warframes are meant to be equal in performance, but the ability of a weapon is determined by Mastery rank. For a while now, weapon performance has been based on a progression system, with higher rank weapons dealing more damage in better ways. Yes, there are high-rank weapons like the Spectra and Embolist that need a buff, but most weapons are well-aligned with their rank. Edited June 8, 2014 by AlchemistMute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VKhaun Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 I think this is power creep talking. The low end weapons are where all weapons should be. The normal solar map stops before lv40. I should not be in a survival blowing away hordes of lv50 enemies like it's nothing or ignoring damage from lv50 enemies like it tickles. Making low level weapons that absurd is... absrud... I agree we need variety and guns should be closer together instead of clear outliers that are the best at everything, but we need to do it mostly with nerfs so guns make sense when we're done. A few weapons definitely need buffs, especially snipers and some of the older clan tech like Spectra, but most guns need nerfs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(PSN)StoneRevolver Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Supra needs a buff :c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMan Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Well you can't really make 100 weapons "balanced", plus I believe that the devs have once stated the they do want weapons tiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prod_Crewman Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 whats gonna happen to the frames? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vargras Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 I think this is power creep talking. The low end weapons are where all weapons should be. The normal solar map stops before lv40. I should not be in a survival blowing away hordes of lv50 enemies like it's nothing or ignoring damage from lv50 enemies like it tickles. Making low level weapons that absurd is... absrud... I agree we need variety and guns should be closer together instead of clear outliers that are the best at everything, but we need to do it mostly with nerfs so guns make sense when we're done. A few weapons definitely need buffs, especially snipers and some of the older clan tech like Spectra, but most guns need nerfs. A boatload of clantech weapons are all collecting dust because of how incredibly terrible they are compared to newer weapons. Supra, Spectra, Flux Rifle, Dera, Grinlok, Torid, Acrid, Embolist, Attica, and potentially some others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VKhaun Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 All Warframes are meant to be equal in performance, but the ability of a weapon is determined by Mastery rank. For a while now, weapon performance has been based on a progression system, with higher rank weapons dealing more damage in better ways. Yes, there are high-rank weapons like the Spectra and Embolist that need a buff, but most weapons are well-aligned with their rank. I absolutely hate this idea. It's totally backwards from what Warframe was supposed to be and the polar opposite of what mastery rank was for. It's not, and has never been described as, a gear progression. Nothing about Mastery says higher weapons have to be better. The point of an action game like this is VARIETY and CHOICE. If only the top few ranks are worth using then that goes out the window. If all the weapons we have now are only for up to Rank 8 or so, then what does that say about how far power creep will go to keep this true? Mastery and strength should never be related. Ever. Considering the low rank of many strong prime weapons, I think DE agrees with me, but I'd feel a lot more comfortable about supporting the game if they said so explicitly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ja_man Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 vote braton prime 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
se05239 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 If anything, DE should tune down OP weapons to the weaker weapon's level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzatuw Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 If anything, DE should tune down OP weapons to the weaker weapon's level.So can I nerf a rank 6 Soma to a rank 0 MK-1 Braton :D? That sounds fun right. Would totally mean balance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlchemistMute Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Mastery and strength should never be related. Ever. Considering the low rank of many strong prime weapons, I think DE agrees with me, but I'd feel a lot more comfortable about supporting the game if they said so explicitly. Unfortunately, I can remember them saying on a devstream that they wanted gear progression and were going to use Mastery rank to determine a weapon's strength. Maybe my memory is faulty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acos Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 (edited) It's been stated that Mastery is tied to the value of gear. This is kind of hit and miss, but generally speaking if a weapon requires a high mastery to unlock then it is meant to be better than other weapons before it. Disagree with nerfing most weapons; when I shoot a gun the expectation is that things I point it at will die. I do not want to be spending several seconds per enemy when this game delivers enemies like piles of leaves in autumn. I agree with the current philosphy of the developers that we need "mini-bosses" to help spice up combat, but I'd rather not arbitrarily raise the difficulty of common mooks, but instead focus on not creating more of them. Edited June 8, 2014 by Acos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorgal_Sina Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Buff the earlier Prime Weapons, Buff Braton and Lato Vandal, Buff Starter Weapons, Buff all Gorgons to LMG level, Buff standard Corpus weapons... Like actually make them worthwhile.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhisperByte Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Well you can't really make 100 weapons "balanced", plus I believe that the devs have once stated the they do want weapons tiers. I don't see them actually following through with the tiered system though... Weapon strength to MR ratio so far is all over the place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deidaku Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Braton prime needs a buff. It's a prime !!! yet I feell like the regular braton did a better job somehow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrashSpider Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 A boatload of clantech weapons are all collecting dust because of how incredibly terrible they are compared to newer weapons. Supra, Spectra, Flux Rifle, Dera, Grinlok, Torid, Acrid, Embolist, Attica, and potentially some others. O come on at least the Dera and Grinlok isn't rage inducing. I think the Marelok needs a nerf though, stats on it makes no sense when its suppose to be the secondary counterpart of the Grinlok. The rest though I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight053 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 (edited) So can I nerf a rank 6 Soma to a rank 0 MK-1 Braton :D? That sounds fun right. Would totally mean balance Learn the difference between nerfing and making it useless. Sigh. Edited June 8, 2014 by Twilight053 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlapClown Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 A boatload of clantech weapons are all collecting dust because of how incredibly terrible they are compared to newer weapons. Supra, Spectra, Flux Rifle, Dera, Grinlok, Torid, Acrid, Embolist, Attica, and potentially some others. +1 yes my flux rifle is 3 forma just to get it on some what of a good lv and still needs 2 more to bring it up on a even plaing feild with the DEV's Beloved Soma and even then 1 or 2 forma and the Some can still beat it And forget trying to keep up with the Boltor prime .The 4 days to make a clan weapon it should be aleast on par with prime/market weapons . Should not have to forma a mastery rank 6 weapon 5 times to get work like it should just because they feal like nerfing the dam thing 3 times like the weapons above also fall under same problem..Funny they nerf Drakra prime just after the release the Nika Dragon just go's to show they want a smaller power creep even is that means making new weapons lower and nerfing older one's to make the new one's seem better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchel Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 i think the purpose of tons of weapons useless or not is to make you grind them lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_Redwire Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 A boatload of clantech weapons are all collecting dust because of how incredibly terrible they are compared to newer weapons. Supra, Spectra, Flux Rifle, Dera, Grinlok, Torid, Acrid, Embolist, Attica, and potentially some others. What's funny about it is that some of these weapons ARE new, yet they're awful anyway. I think DE has a vendetta against clantech being useful. They produced the Synapse and then went "Meh, that's enough good weapons for clantech - the rest can suffer." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doughalo2 Posted June 8, 2014 Author Share Posted June 8, 2014 i never said balence i said BUFF :D NO NERFS !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koolen Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 miter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now