Jump to content
The Lotus Eaters: Share Bug Reports and Feedback Here! ×

Do we need responsible Partners?

(XBOX)XGN DrFeelGood
 Share

Recommended Posts

(XBOX)XGN DrFeelGood

(XBOX)XGN DrFeelGood

Posted
Posted (edited)

   The greatest thing to blame from YouTube and the Blogs would have to be the poor decision making or presentations made to cause or incite damage to the game and it's community. Some examples is Aweblade, Mogamu, and AGGP as some examples. Not to look at the person; but the ideas that is harbored.

  1. While we like to learn some Meta and a thing or two we long forgot it does not mean that subscribers should be set up for bait.
  2. The game is rated M for a reason. While other crowds would have to take responsibility when exposing themselves to violence, gore, and morbid themes it does not entice the other crowds to look at something to change it to a underachieving direction.
  3. When it comes to giving claims or insisting a opinion / idea be magnified by a uninformed crowd more effort has to be put to re sculpt these other views to understand that Warframe is Warframe.
  4. Revisioning a game in beta is one thing; but "retconning" a game with heavy loaded words like "broken" "O P" "Boring" "Lazy" and so forth disrespect the imagination and the intended goal made by people who created products and stories for other people's entertainment.
  5. For those who do not appreciate the game enough there is other games out there than Warframe that meet a preference for those who like to undermine things and get their emotional plunder satisfied, since they refuse to 'git gud'.
  6. Overstepping the privilege to present content is two-fold into bait as people want to get the latest info on content to the game than to hear a rant-fest.
  7. Putting the self interest over the vast criteria of team work intended with playing and speaking to and for others does not feed egos; but misinforms the viewer when they are trying to grasp a concept or a perspective on something of interest.

   In all, it helps to maintain a informed, entertained, and aware audience than to turn them against the developers in a undertone way. There are many partners; but the energy, time, and enthusiasm to bring content to the players and their social interaction to uphold a responsible fan base does not have to go to waste.

Edited by (XB1)XGN DrFeelGood
peterc3 asked for the last paragraphy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
peterc3

peterc3

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, (XB1)XGN DrFeelGood said:

Your welcome.

12 minutes ago, (XB1)XGN DrFeelGood said:

 In all, it helps to maintain a informed, entertained, and aware audience than to turn them against the developers in a undertone way. There are many partners; but the energy, time, and enthusiasm to bring content to the players and their social interaction to uphold a responsible fan base.

In a rather abstract way, I would kind of agree. Person with a platform says X and the people who like said person just parrot X without actually thinking about it.

That being said... this is the internet. Not going to stop that from happening.

Edited by peterc3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
(XBOX)XGN DrFeelGood

(XBOX)XGN DrFeelGood

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 2018-05-18 at 3:08 PM, peterc3 said:

 

In a rather abstract way, I would kind of agree. Person with a platform says X and the people who like said person just parrot X without actually thinking about it.

That being said... this is the internet. Not going to stop[ that from happening.

   The Partnership program does have criteria that has to be meet. If a few Partners decided to group up and be toxic, then we wouldn't have to miss them since they would be playing other games that aren't Warframe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rune_me

rune_me

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, (XB1)XGN DrFeelGood said:
  Hide contents Hide contents

Critical Thinking is part of the focus on the topic.

  

Oh okay. Here's my better answer then:

Quote

If one examines predialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either
reject Baudrillardist simulacra or conclude that sexual identity, perhaps
surprisingly, has objective value, given that the premise of predialectic
theory is valid. Lyotard suggests the use of submodernist cultural theory to
read and analyse narrativity. In a sense, if textual subcultural theory holds,
we have to choose between surrealism and capitalist discourse.

(I made my answer with the postmodernist essay generator, by the way http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeMonkey

DeMonkey

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Vaz2017 said:

I enjoy a little extra vocabulary as much as more than the next person, but OP makes no dang sense.  It's like there are key words missing in every sentence.

It's just bombast, I wouldn't worry. The value of the thread isn't worth the time required to piece it together.

Basically, as Firetempest said, Youtubers cannot have an opinion of their own, and if they do have an opinion they aren't allowed to voice said opinion because of the affect it'll have on the community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Xion

Xion

Posted
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, (XB1)XGN DrFeelGood said:

In all, it helps to maintain a informed, entertained, and aware audience than to turn them against the developers in a undertone way. There are many partners; but the energy, time, and enthusiasm to bring content to the players and their social interaction to uphold a responsible fan base.

The fan base is responsible. When DE #*!%s up, we're quick to act on our responsibility to tell them that they #*!%ed up. Same goes for when/if they do something good. 

Personally, I have found that some of our more "toxic" content creators to be more respectful than the average player when they're ranting off on the latest news. In fact, they're the loudest voice of constructive criticism for DE because of the fact that they're content creators. While your average player is off spewing nonsense because there are no repercussions to what they say, the content creators are giving actual ideas for DE to think about implementing.

Also, content creators wouldn't be content creators if they stopped creating content. But not every creator is contentpun intended with creating the same meta weapon, xp farm, or decorating video over and over again. Some content creators actually want the game to change and they want to use their platform to voice their thoughts and ideas. Content creators are people; with voices, thoughts, and ideas. They are not books to be read and then dumped when you've absorbed all of the information out of them.

As a final note, stop thinking that everyone who badmouths Warframe/DE hates the game or the direction it's going. If anything, they're the ones who actually want the game to get better through change. The reason the "toxic" players and creators don't go to another game is because they appreciate the game enough to want to see progress, not stagnation. 

Edited by Xion
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DatDarkOne

DatDarkOne

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, (XB1)XGN DrFeelGood said:
  Hide contents

Press 'Refresh'

Your welcome.

Annnmnnd it's still bait.  I say bait because you named two youtubers who are generally considered "whiteknights" for DE with the context that they are toxic towards DE. 

If person defends or condemns either them or your idea, they are wrong either way because of how you formulated your first paragraph.  That is the trap.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...